Last updated on

Journal of Educational Psychology
Latest Impact Factor IF - Analysis · Trend · Prediction · Ranking


User Feedback

Journal Impact IF

2021-2022

5.805

15.5%

Journal Impact IF Trend

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Popular Journals

Highly Cited Articles

Journal of Educational Psychology

High Impact Research Articles
Publication Title Author Listing
Publication Title Author Listing
· · · · · ·
· ·
· · · · ·
· · · ·
· ·
· · ·
· · ·
·
· · ·
· · · · · ·
· ·
·
· ·
· · ·
· · · · ·
· · ·
· ·
· ·
· · ·
· ·
· · · ·
· · · · ·
· · · · · ·
· · · ·
· ·
· · · · ·
· · · ·
· · ·
·
·
· · ·
·
· ·
· ·
·
· · ·
· · · ·
· · ·
· · ·
· · · ·
· · ·
· · · · ·
· ·
· · ·
· · · ·
· · · · ·
· ·
· · · · ·

Highly Cited Keywords

Journal of Educational Psychology

High Impact Research Keywords

Journal Impact IF Ranking

Journal of Educational Psychology

Journal Impact IF Ranking
Subcategory Quartile Rank Percentile
Education Q1 7/1319

Education 99%

Developmental and Educational Psychology Q1 8/332

Developmental and Educational Psychology 97%

Journal Impact IF Ranking

· In the Education research field, the Quartile of Journal of Educational Psychology is Q1. Journal of Educational Psychology has been ranked #7 over 1319 related journals in the Education research category. The ranking percentile of Journal of Educational Psychology is around 99% in the field of Education.
· In the Developmental and Educational Psychology research field, the Quartile of Journal of Educational Psychology is Q1. Journal of Educational Psychology has been ranked #8 over 332 related journals in the Developmental and Educational Psychology research category. The ranking percentile of Journal of Educational Psychology is around 97% in the field of Developmental and Educational Psychology.

Related Journals

Journal of Educational Psychology

Similar Journals

Journal of Educational Psychology

The 2021-2022 Journal Impact IF of Journal of Educational Psychology is 5.805, which is just updated in 2022.

Journal of Educational Psychology Impact Factor
Highest IF
5.805
Highest Journal Impact IF

The highest Journal Impact IF of Journal of Educational Psychology is 5.805.

Lowest IF
2.909
Lowest Journal Impact IF

The lowest Journal Impact IF of Journal of Educational Psychology is 2.909.

Total Growth Rate
88.5%
IF Total Growth Rate

The total growth rate of Journal of Educational Psychology IF is 88.5%.

Annual Growth Rate
8.8%
IF Annual Growth Rate

The annual growth rate of Journal of Educational Psychology IF is 8.8%.

Journal Impact IF History

Journal of Educational Psychology

Journal Impact IF Trend

Year Journal Impact IF
Year Journal Impact IF
2022-2023 Check our Real-Time Impact Factor and Impact Factor Prediction Results
2020-2021 5.805
2019-2020 5.028
2018-2019 5.178
2017-2018 4.433
2016-2017 3.459
2015-2016 3.256
2014-2015 3.518
2013-2014 2.909
2012-2013 3.158
2011-2012 3.08
Journal Impact IF History

· The 2020-2021 Journal Impact IF of Journal of Educational Psychology is 5.805
· The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of Journal of Educational Psychology is 5.028
· The 2018-2019 Journal Impact IF of Journal of Educational Psychology is 5.178
· The 2017-2018 Journal Impact IF of Journal of Educational Psychology is 4.433
· The 2016-2017 Journal Impact IF of Journal of Educational Psychology is 3.459
· The 2015-2016 Journal Impact IF of Journal of Educational Psychology is 3.256
· The 2014-2015 Journal Impact IF of Journal of Educational Psychology is 3.518
· The 2013-2014 Journal Impact IF of Journal of Educational Psychology is 2.909
· The 2012-2013 Journal Impact IF of Journal of Educational Psychology is 3.158
· The 2011-2012 Journal Impact IF of Journal of Educational Psychology is 3.08

Journal of Educational Psychology

Journal Key Metrics
Journal Title Journal of Educational Psychology
ISSN 0022-0663
ISSN (Online) 1939-2176
Publisher
American Psychological Association Inc.
Publication Frequency
Monthly
Coverage
1910 - Present
Open Access
NO
Language
English
Highest Impact Factor (2011 - 2022) 5.805
Lowest Impact Factor (2011 - 2022) 2.909
Total Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2011 - 2022) 88.5%
Avarage Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2011 - 2022) 8.8%
Annual Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2021 - 2022) 15.5 %
Publication Fees
Homepage
Submit Manuscript
Wikipedia

Journal of Educational Psychology

Impact Factor 2022-2023 Prediction
Journal of Educational Psychology Impact Factor Predition System

Journal of Educational Psychology Impact Factor Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community.

Predict Check All Preditions

What is Impact Factor?

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly average number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factor values are often deemed to be more important, or carry more intrinsic prestige in their respective fields, than those with lower values.

Journal of Educational Psychology | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones. According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.” Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. The Impact Factor of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. It is frequently used as a Metric for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher Impact Factor are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The Journal of Educational Psychology Impact Factor IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2021) by papers published in the Journal of Educational Psychology during the two preceding years (2019-2020). Note that 2021 Impact Factor are reported in 2022; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2021 publications have been processed by the indexing agency. New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1, are known zero values. Journals that are indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have been indexed for three years. Occasionally, Journal Citation Reports assigns an impact factor to new journals with less than two years of indexing, based on partial citation data. The calculation always uses two complete and known years of item counts, but for new titles one of the known counts is zero. Annuals and other irregular publications sometimes publish no items in a particular year, affecting the count. The impact factor relates to a specific time period; it is possible to calculate it for any desired period. In addition to the 2-year Impact Factor, the 3-year Impact Factor, 4-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Real-Time Impact Factor can provide further insights and factors into the impact of Journal of Educational Psychology.

History

The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Impact factors are calculated yearly starting from 1975 for journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). ISI was acquired by Thomson Scientific & Healthcare in 1992, and became known as Thomson ISI. In 2018, Thomson ISI was sold to Onex Corporation and Baring Private Equity Asia. They founded a new corporation, Clarivate, which is now the publisher of the JCR.

Use

The impact factor is used to compare different journals within a certain field. The Web of Science indexes more than 11,500 science and social science journals. Journal impact factors are often used to evaluate the merit of individual articles and individual researchers. This use of impact factors was summarised by Hoeffel:

Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation. Experience has shown that in each specialty the best journals are those in which it is most difficult to have an article accepted, and these are the journals that have a high impact factor. Most of these journals existed long before the impact factor was devised. The use of impact factor as a measure of quality is widespread because it fits well with the opinion we have in each field of the best journals in our specialty....In conclusion, prestigious journals publish papers of high level. Therefore, their impact factor is high, and not the contrary.

Eugene Garfield

In brief, Impact factors may be used by:
  • Authors to decide where to submit an article for publication.
  • Libraries to make collection development decisions
  • Academic departments to assess academic productivity
  • Academic departments to make decisions on promotion and tenure.
As impact factors are a journal-level metric, rather than an article- or individual-level metric, this use is controversial. Garfield agrees with Hoeffel,but warns about the "misuse in evaluating individuals" because there is "a wide variation [of citations] from article to article within a single journal". Other things to consider about Impact Factors:
  • Many journals do not have an impact factor.
  • The impact factor cannot assess the quality of individual articles. Even if citations were evenly distributed among articles, the impact factor would only measure the interests of other researchers in an article, not its importance and usefulness.
  • Only research articles, technical notes and reviews are “citable” items. Editorials, letters, news items and meeting abstracts are “non-citable items”.
  • Only a small percentage of articles are highly cited and they are found in a small subset of journals. This small proportion accounts for a large percentage of citations.
  • Controversial papers, such as those based on fraudulent data, may be highly cited, distorting the impact factor of a journal.
  • Citation bias may exist. For example, English language resources may be favoured. Authors may cite their own work.
Moreover, informed and careful use of these impact data is essential, and should be based on a thorough understanding of the methodology used to generate impact factors. There are controversial aspects of using impact factors:
  • It is not clear whether the number of times a paper is cited measures its actual quality.
  • Some databases that calculate impact factors fail to incorporate publications including textbooks, handbooks and reference books.
  • Certain disciplines have low numbers of journals and usage. Therefore, one should only compare journals or researchers within the same discipline.
  • Review articles normally are cited more often and therefore can skew results.
  • Self-citing may also skew results.
  • Some resources used to calculate impact factors have inadequate international coverage.
  • Editorial policies can artificially inflate an impact factor.
Impact factors have often been used in advancement and tenure decision-making. Many recognize that this is a coarse tool for such important decisions, and that a multitude of factors should be taken into account in these deliberations. When considering the use of the impact factor (IF), keep these aspects in mind:
  • IF analysis is limited to citations from the journals indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge. Currently, the Web of Science indexes only 8621 journals across the full breadth of the sciences, and just 3121 in the social sciences.
  • A high IF/citation rate says nothing about the quality -- or even, validity -- of the references being cited. Notorious or even retracted articles often attract a lot of attention, hence a high number of citations. The notority related to the first publication on "cold fusion" is one such example.
  • Journals that publish more "review articles" are often found near the top of the rankings. While not known for publishing new, creative findings, these individual articles tend to be heavily cited.
  • The IF measures the average number of citations to articles in the journal -- given this, a small number of highly-cited articles will skew the figure.
  • It takes several years for new journals to be added to the list of titles indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge, so these newer titles will be under-represented.
  • It's alleged that journal editors have learned to "game" the system, encouraging authors to cite their works previously published in the same journal.
Comparing Journals Across Disciplines? Not a good idea! Using Impact Factors within a given discipline should only be done with great care, as described above. Using impact factor data to compare journals across disciplines is even more problematic. Here are some of the reasons:
  • Disciplines where older literature is still referenced, such as Chemistry and Mathematics, offer challenges to the methodolgy since older citations (older than two years) are not used to calculate the impact factor for a given journal. (Five-year impact factor analysis, which can be calculated using the Journal Citation Index database, helps smooth out this problem only to some degree.)
  • Different disciplines have different practices regarding tendency to cite larger numbers of references. Higher overall citation rates will bump upward impact factor measurements.
  • Where it's common for large numbers of authors to collaborate on a single paper, such as in Physics, the tendency of authors to cite themselves (and in this case, more authors) will result in increased citation rates.

Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor

Pros:

  • A vetted, established metric for measuring journal impact within a discipline.
  • Designed to eliminate bias based on journal size and frequency.
Cons:
  • Individual articles makes an uneven contribution to overall Impact Factor.
  • Impact Factor does not account for certain things, things like context (postive or negative citaion) and intentionality (self-citation).
  • The metric is proprietary to and bound by the contents of the Thomson Reuters database.
  • Citations, on which the Impact Factor is based, count for less than 1% of an article's overall use.

Criticism

Numerous critiques have been made regarding the use of impact factors. A 2007 study noted that the most fundamental flaw is that impact factors present the mean of data that are not normally distributed, and suggested that it would be more appropriate to present the median of these data. There is also a more general debate on the validity of the impact factor as a measure of journal importance and the effect of policies that editors may adopt to boost their impact factor (perhaps to the detriment of readers and writers). Other criticism focuses on the effect of the impact factor on behavior of scholars, editors and other stakeholders. Others have made more general criticisms, arguing that emphasis on impact factor results from negative influence of neoliberal policies on academia claiming that what is needed is not just replacement of the impact factor with more sophisticated metrics for science publications but also discussion on the social value of research assessment and the growing precariousness of scientific careers in higher education.
Experts stress that there are limitations in using impact factors to evaluate a scholar's work. There are many reasons cited for not relying on impact factor alone to evaluate the output of a particular individual. Among these are the following:

  • A single factor is not sufficient for evaluating an author's work.
  • Journal values are meaningless unless compared within the same discipline. Impact factors vary among disciplines.
  • The impact factor was originally devised to show the impact of a specific journal, not a specific scholar. The quality and impact of the author's work may extend beyond the impact of a particular journal.
According to Jim Testa, a researcher for ThomsonReuters Scientific, the most widespread misuse of the Impact Factor is to evaluate the work of an individual author (instead of a journal). "To say that because a researcher is publishing in a certain journal, he or she is more influential or deserves more credit is not necessarily true. There are many other variables to consider." (interview 6/26/2008 in Thomson Reuters blog entry)

Journal of Educational Psychology
Journal Profile

About

The main purpose of the Journal of Educational Psychology® is to publish original, primary psychological research pertaining to education across all ages and educational levels. A secondary purpose of the Journal is the occasional publication of exceptionally important theoretical and review articles that are pertinent to educational psychology. Please note, the Journal does not typically publish reliability and validity studies of specific tests or assessment instruments. The Journal of Educational Psychology is a peer-reviewed academic journal that was established in 1910 and covers educational psychology. It is published by the American Psychological Association. The current editor-in-chief is Steve Graham (Arizona State University). The journal publishes original psychological research on education at all ages and educational levels, as well as occasional theoretical and review articles deemed of particular importance.

ISSN
0022-0663
ISSN

The ISSN of Journal of Educational Psychology is 0022-0663 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

ISSN (Online)
1939-2176
ISSN (Online)

The ISSN (Online) of Journal of Educational Psychology is 1939-2176 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

Publisher
American Psychological Association Inc.
Publisher

Journal of Educational Psychology is published by American Psychological Association Inc. .

Publication Frequency
Monthly
Publication Frequency

Journal of Educational Psychology publishes reports Monthly .

Coverage
1910 - Present
Coverage

The Publication History of Journal of Educational Psychology covers 1910 - Present .

Open Access
NO
Open Access

Publication Fees
Publication Fees

Language
English
Language

The language of Journal of Educational Psychology is English .

Country/Region
United States
Country/Region

The publisher of Journal of Educational Psychology is American Psychological Association Inc. , which locates in United States .

International Collaboration Trend

Journal of Educational Psychology

Cited Documents Trend

Journal of Educational Psychology

Total Publications
9121
Total Citations
769334

Annual Publication Volume

Journal of Educational Psychology

Annual Citation Record

Journal of Educational Psychology

Publications Cites Dataset

Journal of Educational Psychology

Year Publications Citations
Year Publications Citations
1922 57 26
1923 89 55
1924 100 40
1925 113 20
1926 100 83
1927 106 132
1928 108 94
1929 115 61
1930 109 127
1931 92 194
1932 116 149
1933 101 363
1934 104 183
1935 101 172
1936 104 192
1937 97 210
1938 95 289
1939 98 280
1940 94 356
1941 111 402
1942 105 347
1943 80 252
1944 76 286
1945 57 232
1946 70 320
1947 67 280
1948 73 231
1949 60 245
1950 62 428
1951 71 382
1952 81 299
1953 71 397
1954 73 325
1955 69 358
1956 71 361
1957 92 393
1958 58 344
1959 51 379
1960 58 448
1961 52 425
1962 50 615
1963 50 586
1964 54 842
1965 50 818
1966 53 936
1967 61 1030
1968 75 1285
1969 84 1358
1970 74 1644
1971 81 1746
1972 86 1683
1973 108 1794
1974 132 1935
1975 129 2333
1976 115 2411
1977 101 2789
1978 129 3088
1979 94 3263
1980 96 3939
1981 93 3887
1982 87 4030
1983 86 4579
1984 110 4901
1985 66 5332
1986 57 4677
1987 68 5034
1988 79 5506
1989 76 5381
1990 106 5265
1991 61 5553
1992 60 5313
1993 64 5765
1994 54 6000
1995 51 6228
1996 57 7306
1997 64 6698
1998 58 7440
1999 64 7997
2000 71 8873
2001 68 9919
2002 66 11604
2003 70 12218
2004 66 14466
2005 56 16438
2006 65 18968
2007 76 22001
2008 95 26073
2009 107 29376
2010 98 32602
2011 90 35897
2012 111 40604
2013 114 44150
2014 133 47129
2015 73 45342
2016 97 43542
2017 116 39469
2018 67 31701
2019 110 37615
2020 175 46761
2021 12 3224
Publications Cites Dataset

· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 57 reports and received 26 citations in 1922.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 89 reports and received 55 citations in 1923.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 100 reports and received 40 citations in 1924.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 113 reports and received 20 citations in 1925.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 100 reports and received 83 citations in 1926.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 106 reports and received 132 citations in 1927.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 108 reports and received 94 citations in 1928.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 115 reports and received 61 citations in 1929.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 109 reports and received 127 citations in 1930.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 92 reports and received 194 citations in 1931.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 116 reports and received 149 citations in 1932.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 101 reports and received 363 citations in 1933.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 104 reports and received 183 citations in 1934.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 101 reports and received 172 citations in 1935.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 104 reports and received 192 citations in 1936.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 97 reports and received 210 citations in 1937.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 95 reports and received 289 citations in 1938.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 98 reports and received 280 citations in 1939.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 94 reports and received 356 citations in 1940.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 111 reports and received 402 citations in 1941.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 105 reports and received 347 citations in 1942.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 80 reports and received 252 citations in 1943.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 76 reports and received 286 citations in 1944.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 57 reports and received 232 citations in 1945.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 70 reports and received 320 citations in 1946.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 67 reports and received 280 citations in 1947.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 73 reports and received 231 citations in 1948.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 60 reports and received 245 citations in 1949.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 62 reports and received 428 citations in 1950.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 71 reports and received 382 citations in 1951.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 81 reports and received 299 citations in 1952.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 71 reports and received 397 citations in 1953.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 73 reports and received 325 citations in 1954.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 69 reports and received 358 citations in 1955.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 71 reports and received 361 citations in 1956.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 92 reports and received 393 citations in 1957.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 58 reports and received 344 citations in 1958.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 51 reports and received 379 citations in 1959.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 58 reports and received 448 citations in 1960.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 52 reports and received 425 citations in 1961.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 50 reports and received 615 citations in 1962.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 50 reports and received 586 citations in 1963.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 54 reports and received 842 citations in 1964.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 50 reports and received 818 citations in 1965.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 53 reports and received 936 citations in 1966.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 61 reports and received 1030 citations in 1967.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 75 reports and received 1285 citations in 1968.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 84 reports and received 1358 citations in 1969.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 74 reports and received 1644 citations in 1970.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 81 reports and received 1746 citations in 1971.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 86 reports and received 1683 citations in 1972.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 108 reports and received 1794 citations in 1973.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 132 reports and received 1935 citations in 1974.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 129 reports and received 2333 citations in 1975.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 115 reports and received 2411 citations in 1976.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 101 reports and received 2789 citations in 1977.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 129 reports and received 3088 citations in 1978.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 94 reports and received 3263 citations in 1979.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 96 reports and received 3939 citations in 1980.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 93 reports and received 3887 citations in 1981.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 87 reports and received 4030 citations in 1982.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 86 reports and received 4579 citations in 1983.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 110 reports and received 4901 citations in 1984.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 66 reports and received 5332 citations in 1985.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 57 reports and received 4677 citations in 1986.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 68 reports and received 5034 citations in 1987.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 79 reports and received 5506 citations in 1988.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 76 reports and received 5381 citations in 1989.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 106 reports and received 5265 citations in 1990.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 61 reports and received 5553 citations in 1991.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 60 reports and received 5313 citations in 1992.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 64 reports and received 5765 citations in 1993.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 54 reports and received 6000 citations in 1994.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 51 reports and received 6228 citations in 1995.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 57 reports and received 7306 citations in 1996.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 64 reports and received 6698 citations in 1997.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 58 reports and received 7440 citations in 1998.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 64 reports and received 7997 citations in 1999.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 71 reports and received 8873 citations in 2000.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 68 reports and received 9919 citations in 2001.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 66 reports and received 11604 citations in 2002.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 70 reports and received 12218 citations in 2003.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 66 reports and received 14466 citations in 2004.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 56 reports and received 16438 citations in 2005.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 65 reports and received 18968 citations in 2006.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 76 reports and received 22001 citations in 2007.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 95 reports and received 26073 citations in 2008.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 107 reports and received 29376 citations in 2009.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 98 reports and received 32602 citations in 2010.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 90 reports and received 35897 citations in 2011.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 111 reports and received 40604 citations in 2012.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 114 reports and received 44150 citations in 2013.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 133 reports and received 47129 citations in 2014.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 73 reports and received 45342 citations in 2015.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 97 reports and received 43542 citations in 2016.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 116 reports and received 39469 citations in 2017.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 67 reports and received 31701 citations in 2018.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 110 reports and received 37615 citations in 2019.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 175 reports and received 46761 citations in 2020.
· The Journal of Educational Psychology has published 12 reports and received 3224 citations in 2021.
· The total publications of Journal of Educational Psychology is 9121.
· The total citations of Journal of Educational Psychology is 769334.

Share Your Impact Factor Information with Community

Do you know the Latest Impact Factor of Journal of Educational Psychology? Share with the community!

Impact Factor

What is the Latest Impact Factor?

Data Source

Where do you get the information?



Impact Factor Data Source
Impact Factor Data Source
5.805 Baidu

Thanks for sharing your information with us!

Journal of Educational Psychology - DOI: 10.1037/EDU0000316
The role of semantic information in children’s word reading: Does meaning affect readers’ ability to say polysyllabic words aloud?

Devin M. Kearns · Reem Al Ghanem ·

Psychology
PDF

Journal of Educational Psychology - DOI: 10.1037/EDU0000339
Metacognitive judgments of prior material facilitate the learning of new material: The forward effect of metacognitive judgments in inductive learning

Hee Seung Lee · Hyorim Ha ·

Psychology
PDF

Journal of Educational Psychology - DOI: 10.1037/EDU0000339
Metacognitive judgments of prior material facilitate the learning of new material: The forward effect of metacognitive judgments in inductive learning

Hee Seung Lee · Hyorim Ha ·

Psychology
PDF

ERMS is a fairly new addition to organizations, and those organizations are still learning how to use them effectively.

The Key Factors in Adopting an Electronic Records Management System (ERMS) in the Educational Sector: A UTAUT-Based Framework [10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2904617]


Participating students discuss current marketing topics with peers, marketing practitioners, and faculty to reinforce course concepts, improve learning perceptions, and increase professional communication skills and networking opportunities.

Intercollegiate Social Media Education Ecosystem [10.1177/0273475318786026]


Participants received same-compression DM and DBT with independent double reading for both DM and DM plus DBT reading modes.

Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based Screening. [10.1148/radiol.2019190425]


We evaluated the relationships between specific aspects of musical training/ability and scores on a series of standardized reading assessments in a sample of twins.

Genetic and Environmental Influences on Decoding Skills – Implications for Music and Reading [10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02604]


Our results suggest a fundamental difference in how dopamine release is regulated to achieve distinct functions: broadcast burst signals promote learning, whereas local control drives motivation.

Dissociable dopamine dynamics for learning and motivation. [10.1038/s41586-019-1235-y]


Despite remarkable progress in the field of deep learning assisted human pose estimation, the performance of such systems decreases while noise and errors increase with the complexity of the scene.

Refining Joint Locations for Human Pose Tracking in Sports Videos [10.1109/CVPRW.2019.00308]

Scientific Writng Keywords