Last updated on

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences
Latest Impact Factor IF - Analysis · Trend · Prediction · Ranking


User Feedback

Journal Impact IF

2021-2022

0.801

12.7%

Journal Impact IF Trend

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Popular Journals

Highly Cited Articles

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences

High Impact Research Articles
Publication Title Author Listing
Publication Title Author Listing
· ·
· · · · ·
· · · ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· · · · ·
· · · ·
· ·
· ·
· · · ·
· ·
· · · · ·
· · ·
· · · ·
· ·
· · · ·
·
· ·
· · · ·
· · ·
· · ·
· · ·
· · · · ·
· · ·
· ·
· · ·
· · · ·
· · ·
· ·
· ·
· · ·
· · · · · ·
· · · · ·
· · ·
· · · · ·
· ·
· · ·
· ·
· ·
· · ·
· · ·
· ·

Highly Cited Keywords

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences

High Impact Research Keywords

Research Scope

Journal Impact IF Ranking

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences

Journal Impact IF Ranking
Subcategory Quartile Rank Percentile
Aquatic Science Q4 176/224

Aquatic Science 21%

Journal Impact IF Ranking

· In the Aquatic Science research field, the Quartile of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences is Q4. Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences has been ranked #176 over 224 related journals in the Aquatic Science research category. The ranking percentile of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences is around 21% in the field of Aquatic Science.

Related Journals

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences

Similar Journals

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences

The 2021-2022 Journal Impact IF of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences is 0.801, which is just updated in 2022.

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences Impact Factor
Highest IF
0.984
Highest Journal Impact IF

The highest Journal Impact IF of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences is 0.984.

Lowest IF
0.285
Lowest Journal Impact IF

The lowest Journal Impact IF of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences is 0.285.

Total Growth Rate
-18.6%
IF Total Growth Rate

The total growth rate of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences IF is -18.6%.

Annual Growth Rate
-1.9%
IF Annual Growth Rate

The annual growth rate of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences IF is -1.9%.

Journal Impact IF History

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences

Journal Impact IF Trend

Year Journal Impact IF
Year Journal Impact IF
2022-2023 Check our Real-Time Impact Factor and Impact Factor Prediction Results
2020-2021 0.801
2019-2020 0.711
2018-2019 0.495
2017-2018 0.446
2016-2017 0.285
2015-2016 0.393
2014-2015 0.372
2013-2014 0.32
2012-2013 0.614
2011-2012 0.984
Journal Impact IF History

· The 2020-2021 Journal Impact IF of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences is 0.801
· The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences is 0.711
· The 2018-2019 Journal Impact IF of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences is 0.495
· The 2017-2018 Journal Impact IF of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences is 0.446
· The 2016-2017 Journal Impact IF of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences is 0.285
· The 2015-2016 Journal Impact IF of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences is 0.393
· The 2014-2015 Journal Impact IF of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences is 0.372
· The 2013-2014 Journal Impact IF of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences is 0.32
· The 2012-2013 Journal Impact IF of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences is 0.614
· The 2011-2012 Journal Impact IF of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences is 0.984

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences

Journal Key Metrics
Journal Title Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences
ISSN 1562-2916
ISSN (Online) -
Publisher
Iranian Fisheries Research Organization
Publication Frequency
Semiannual
Coverage
2008 - Present
Open Access
NO
Language
English
Highest Impact Factor (2011 - 2022) 0.984
Lowest Impact Factor (2011 - 2022) 0.285
Total Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2011 - 2022) -18.6%
Avarage Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2011 - 2022) -1.9%
Annual Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2021 - 2022) 12.7 %
Publication Fees
Homepage
Submit Manuscript

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences

Impact Factor 2022-2023 Prediction
Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences Impact Factor Predition System

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences Impact Factor Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community.

Predict Check All Preditions

What is Impact Factor?

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly average number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factor values are often deemed to be more important, or carry more intrinsic prestige in their respective fields, than those with lower values.

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones. According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.” Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. The Impact Factor of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. It is frequently used as a Metric for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher Impact Factor are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences Impact Factor IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2021) by papers published in the Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences during the two preceding years (2019-2020). Note that 2021 Impact Factor are reported in 2022; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2021 publications have been processed by the indexing agency. New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1, are known zero values. Journals that are indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have been indexed for three years. Occasionally, Journal Citation Reports assigns an impact factor to new journals with less than two years of indexing, based on partial citation data. The calculation always uses two complete and known years of item counts, but for new titles one of the known counts is zero. Annuals and other irregular publications sometimes publish no items in a particular year, affecting the count. The impact factor relates to a specific time period; it is possible to calculate it for any desired period. In addition to the 2-year Impact Factor, the 3-year Impact Factor, 4-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Real-Time Impact Factor can provide further insights and factors into the impact of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences.

History

The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Impact factors are calculated yearly starting from 1975 for journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). ISI was acquired by Thomson Scientific & Healthcare in 1992, and became known as Thomson ISI. In 2018, Thomson ISI was sold to Onex Corporation and Baring Private Equity Asia. They founded a new corporation, Clarivate, which is now the publisher of the JCR.

Use

The impact factor is used to compare different journals within a certain field. The Web of Science indexes more than 11,500 science and social science journals. Journal impact factors are often used to evaluate the merit of individual articles and individual researchers. This use of impact factors was summarised by Hoeffel:

Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation. Experience has shown that in each specialty the best journals are those in which it is most difficult to have an article accepted, and these are the journals that have a high impact factor. Most of these journals existed long before the impact factor was devised. The use of impact factor as a measure of quality is widespread because it fits well with the opinion we have in each field of the best journals in our specialty....In conclusion, prestigious journals publish papers of high level. Therefore, their impact factor is high, and not the contrary.

Eugene Garfield

In brief, Impact factors may be used by:
  • Authors to decide where to submit an article for publication.
  • Libraries to make collection development decisions
  • Academic departments to assess academic productivity
  • Academic departments to make decisions on promotion and tenure.
As impact factors are a journal-level metric, rather than an article- or individual-level metric, this use is controversial. Garfield agrees with Hoeffel,but warns about the "misuse in evaluating individuals" because there is "a wide variation [of citations] from article to article within a single journal". Other things to consider about Impact Factors:
  • Many journals do not have an impact factor.
  • The impact factor cannot assess the quality of individual articles. Even if citations were evenly distributed among articles, the impact factor would only measure the interests of other researchers in an article, not its importance and usefulness.
  • Only research articles, technical notes and reviews are “citable” items. Editorials, letters, news items and meeting abstracts are “non-citable items”.
  • Only a small percentage of articles are highly cited and they are found in a small subset of journals. This small proportion accounts for a large percentage of citations.
  • Controversial papers, such as those based on fraudulent data, may be highly cited, distorting the impact factor of a journal.
  • Citation bias may exist. For example, English language resources may be favoured. Authors may cite their own work.
Moreover, informed and careful use of these impact data is essential, and should be based on a thorough understanding of the methodology used to generate impact factors. There are controversial aspects of using impact factors:
  • It is not clear whether the number of times a paper is cited measures its actual quality.
  • Some databases that calculate impact factors fail to incorporate publications including textbooks, handbooks and reference books.
  • Certain disciplines have low numbers of journals and usage. Therefore, one should only compare journals or researchers within the same discipline.
  • Review articles normally are cited more often and therefore can skew results.
  • Self-citing may also skew results.
  • Some resources used to calculate impact factors have inadequate international coverage.
  • Editorial policies can artificially inflate an impact factor.
Impact factors have often been used in advancement and tenure decision-making. Many recognize that this is a coarse tool for such important decisions, and that a multitude of factors should be taken into account in these deliberations. When considering the use of the impact factor (IF), keep these aspects in mind:
  • IF analysis is limited to citations from the journals indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge. Currently, the Web of Science indexes only 8621 journals across the full breadth of the sciences, and just 3121 in the social sciences.
  • A high IF/citation rate says nothing about the quality -- or even, validity -- of the references being cited. Notorious or even retracted articles often attract a lot of attention, hence a high number of citations. The notority related to the first publication on "cold fusion" is one such example.
  • Journals that publish more "review articles" are often found near the top of the rankings. While not known for publishing new, creative findings, these individual articles tend to be heavily cited.
  • The IF measures the average number of citations to articles in the journal -- given this, a small number of highly-cited articles will skew the figure.
  • It takes several years for new journals to be added to the list of titles indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge, so these newer titles will be under-represented.
  • It's alleged that journal editors have learned to "game" the system, encouraging authors to cite their works previously published in the same journal.
Comparing Journals Across Disciplines? Not a good idea! Using Impact Factors within a given discipline should only be done with great care, as described above. Using impact factor data to compare journals across disciplines is even more problematic. Here are some of the reasons:
  • Disciplines where older literature is still referenced, such as Chemistry and Mathematics, offer challenges to the methodolgy since older citations (older than two years) are not used to calculate the impact factor for a given journal. (Five-year impact factor analysis, which can be calculated using the Journal Citation Index database, helps smooth out this problem only to some degree.)
  • Different disciplines have different practices regarding tendency to cite larger numbers of references. Higher overall citation rates will bump upward impact factor measurements.
  • Where it's common for large numbers of authors to collaborate on a single paper, such as in Physics, the tendency of authors to cite themselves (and in this case, more authors) will result in increased citation rates.

Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor

Pros:

  • A vetted, established metric for measuring journal impact within a discipline.
  • Designed to eliminate bias based on journal size and frequency.
Cons:
  • Individual articles makes an uneven contribution to overall Impact Factor.
  • Impact Factor does not account for certain things, things like context (postive or negative citaion) and intentionality (self-citation).
  • The metric is proprietary to and bound by the contents of the Thomson Reuters database.
  • Citations, on which the Impact Factor is based, count for less than 1% of an article's overall use.

Criticism

Numerous critiques have been made regarding the use of impact factors. A 2007 study noted that the most fundamental flaw is that impact factors present the mean of data that are not normally distributed, and suggested that it would be more appropriate to present the median of these data. There is also a more general debate on the validity of the impact factor as a measure of journal importance and the effect of policies that editors may adopt to boost their impact factor (perhaps to the detriment of readers and writers). Other criticism focuses on the effect of the impact factor on behavior of scholars, editors and other stakeholders. Others have made more general criticisms, arguing that emphasis on impact factor results from negative influence of neoliberal policies on academia claiming that what is needed is not just replacement of the impact factor with more sophisticated metrics for science publications but also discussion on the social value of research assessment and the growing precariousness of scientific careers in higher education.
Experts stress that there are limitations in using impact factors to evaluate a scholar's work. There are many reasons cited for not relying on impact factor alone to evaluate the output of a particular individual. Among these are the following:

  • A single factor is not sufficient for evaluating an author's work.
  • Journal values are meaningless unless compared within the same discipline. Impact factors vary among disciplines.
  • The impact factor was originally devised to show the impact of a specific journal, not a specific scholar. The quality and impact of the author's work may extend beyond the impact of a particular journal.
According to Jim Testa, a researcher for ThomsonReuters Scientific, the most widespread misuse of the Impact Factor is to evaluate the work of an individual author (instead of a journal). "To say that because a researcher is publishing in a certain journal, he or she is more influential or deserves more credit is not necessarily true. There are many other variables to consider." (interview 6/26/2008 in Thomson Reuters blog entry)

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences
Journal Profile

About

1- Living various species (contains animals and vegetal species) in various aquatic ecosystems. 2- Health and diseases of aquatic species. 3- Determining the stocks and specific time and location for catching and reliable exploitation for sustainable development. 4- Methods of propagation and culture of high value aquatic resources. 5- Aquatic stock assessment and the methods of restocking the high value species and suggestion for rate, areas and the time for releasing fish and other aquatic organisms fries. 6- Pollutant agents and their effects to the environments of aquatic species. 7- Feed and feeding in aquatic organisms. 8- Fish processing and producing new products. 9- The economic and social aspects of fisheries. None

ISSN
1562-2916
ISSN

The ISSN of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences is 1562-2916 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

ISSN (Online)
-
ISSN (Online)

The ISSN (Online) of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences is - . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

Publisher
Iranian Fisheries Research Organization
Publisher

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences is published by Iranian Fisheries Research Organization .

Publication Frequency
Semiannual
Publication Frequency

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences publishes reports Semiannual .

Coverage
2008 - Present
Coverage

The Publication History of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences covers 2008 - Present .

Open Access
NO
Open Access

Publication Fees
Publication Fees

Language
English
Language

The language of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences is English .

Country/Region
Iran
Country/Region

The publisher of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences is Iranian Fisheries Research Organization , which locates in Iran .

International Collaboration Trend

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences

Cited Documents Trend

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences

Total Publications
1180
Total Citations
3304

Annual Publication Volume

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences

Annual Citation Record

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences

Publications Cites Dataset

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences

Year Publications Citations
Year Publications Citations
2000 12 1
2001 11 1
2003 1 1
2004 6 1
2005 15 2
2006 14 4
2007 14 9
2008 15 7
2009 20 13
2010 43 32
2011 72 102
2012 75 135
2013 78 185
2014 85 283
2015 89 314
2016 129 335
2017 109 316
2018 76 371
2019 91 459
2020 215 635
2021 0 98
Publications Cites Dataset

· The Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences has published 12 reports and received 1 citations in 2000.
· The Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences has published 11 reports and received 1 citations in 2001.
· The Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences has published 1 reports and received 1 citations in 2003.
· The Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences has published 6 reports and received 1 citations in 2004.
· The Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences has published 15 reports and received 2 citations in 2005.
· The Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences has published 14 reports and received 4 citations in 2006.
· The Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences has published 14 reports and received 9 citations in 2007.
· The Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences has published 15 reports and received 7 citations in 2008.
· The Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences has published 20 reports and received 13 citations in 2009.
· The Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences has published 43 reports and received 32 citations in 2010.
· The Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences has published 72 reports and received 102 citations in 2011.
· The Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences has published 75 reports and received 135 citations in 2012.
· The Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences has published 78 reports and received 185 citations in 2013.
· The Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences has published 85 reports and received 283 citations in 2014.
· The Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences has published 89 reports and received 314 citations in 2015.
· The Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences has published 129 reports and received 335 citations in 2016.
· The Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences has published 109 reports and received 316 citations in 2017.
· The Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences has published 76 reports and received 371 citations in 2018.
· The Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences has published 91 reports and received 459 citations in 2019.
· The Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences has published 215 reports and received 635 citations in 2020.
· The Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences has published 0 reports and received 98 citations in 2021.
· The total publications of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences is 1180.
· The total citations of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences is 3304.

Share Your Impact Factor Information with Community

Do you know the Latest Impact Factor of Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences? Share with the community!

Impact Factor

What is the Latest Impact Factor?

Data Source

Where do you get the information?



Impact Factor Data Source
Impact Factor Data Source
0.801 BioxBio

Thanks for sharing your information with us!

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences - DOI: 10.22092/IJFS.2018.116981
Effects of three beta adrenergic receptor agonists on growth performance, blood biochemical parameters, fatty acids composition and carnitine palmitoyltransferase I gene expression of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss

S.M.A. Jalali · S.A.H Jalali · F. Yadollahi ·

Chemistry
PDF

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences - DOI: 10.22092/IJFS.2018.116981
Effects of three beta adrenergic receptor agonists on growth performance, blood biochemical parameters, fatty acids composition and carnitine palmitoyltransferase I gene expression of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss

S.M.A. Jalali · S.A.H Jalali · F. Yadollahi ·

Chemistry
PDF

Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences - DOI: 10.22092/IJFS.2018.116981
Effects of three beta adrenergic receptor agonists on growth performance, blood biochemical parameters, fatty acids composition and carnitine palmitoyltransferase I gene expression of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss

S.M.A. Jalali · S.A.H Jalali · F. Yadollahi ·

Chemistry
PDF

The instability growth rate was estimated from the analytical method and also from the numerical method using strong–weak and strong–strong interactions among the electrons and ions.

Investigation of fast beam-ion instability (FBII) in wake function formalism for the Indus-2 storage ring [10.1016/J.NIMA.2018.12.055]


The results suggest that the mutation is strongly associated with growth related traits and it is likely to be useful for marker-assisted selection of chickens.

A novel 86-bp indel of the motilin receptor gene is significantly associated with growth and carcass traits in Gushi-Anka F2 reciprocal cross chickens [10.1080/00071668.2019.1655710]


15 Intershell cross-linking effects, as a function of electron radiation dose, were also revealed in the multiwalled carbon nanotubes.

Advanced microelectromechanical systems-based nanomechanical testing: Beyond stress and strain measurements [10.1557/MRS.2019.123]


Thus, the use of these materials, specifically plates of aluminum will be analyzed and then, discussed the effects implications, since these buildings represent a cultural and architectural heritage that establishes architectural successes.

Ornamentation and Modern Architecture in Iraq [10.31026/J.ENG.2019.06.09]


This paper investigates the variability of dynamic responses of a beam resting on an elastic foundation, which is subjected to a vehicle with uncertain parameters, such as random mass, stiffness, damping of the vehicle and random fields of mass density, and the elastic modulus of the beam and stiffness of elastic foundation.

The variability of dynamic responses of beams resting on elastic foundation subjected to vehicle with random system parameters [10.1016/J.APM.2018.11.018]


Key parameters relating to cataracts were sourced from the literature and the NZ Ministry of Health.

Cataract surgery for falls prevention and improving vision: modelling the health gain, health system costs and cost-effectiveness in a high-income country [10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043184]

Scientific Writng Keywords