International Studies Review
Journal Impact IF - Analysis · Trend · Prediction · Ranking


New

Journal Impact IF

2019-2020

2.232

7.5%

Journal Impact IF Trend

Related Journals

Popular Journals

International Studies Review

The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of International Studies Review is 2.232, which is just updated in 2020.

International Studies Review Impact Factor
Highest IF
2.232
Highest Journal Impact IF

The highest Journal Impact IF of International Studies Review is 2.232.

Lowest IF
0.74
Lowest Journal Impact IF

The lowest Journal Impact IF of International Studies Review is 0.74.

Total Growth Rate
201.6%
IF Total Growth Rate

The total growth rate of International Studies Review IF is 201.6%.

Annual Growth Rate
22.4%
IF Annual Growth Rate

The annual growth rate of International Studies Review IF is 22.4%.

Journal Impact IF Ranking

Subcategory Quartile Rank Percentile
Geography, Planning and Development Q1 107/679

Geography, Planning and Development 84%

Political Science and International Relations Q1 38/529

Political Science and International Relations 92%

Journal Impact IF Ranking

· In the Geography, Planning and Development research field, the Quartile of International Studies Review is Q1. International Studies Review has been ranked #107 over 679 related journals in the Geography, Planning and Development research category. The ranking percentile of International Studies Review is around 84% in the field of Geography, Planning and Development.
· In the Political Science and International Relations research field, the Quartile of International Studies Review is Q1. International Studies Review has been ranked #38 over 529 related journals in the Political Science and International Relations research category. The ranking percentile of International Studies Review is around 92% in the field of Political Science and International Relations.

International Studies Review Impact Factor 2020-2021 Prediction

International Studies Review Impact Factor Predition System

International Studies Review Impact Factor Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community.

Predict Check All Preditions
Total Publications
1913
Total Citations
25240

Annual Publication Volume

Annual Citation Record

International Collaboration Trend

Cited Documents Trend

Journal Impact IF History

Year Journal Impact IF
Year Journal Impact IF
2019-2020 2.232
2018-2019 2.076
2017-2018 1.631
2016-2017 1.259
2015-2016 1.283
2014-2015 0.878
2013-2014 0.935
2012-2013 1.063
2011-2012 0.74
Journal Impact IF History

· The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of International Studies Review is 2.232
· The 2018-2019 Journal Impact IF of International Studies Review is 2.076
· The 2017-2018 Journal Impact IF of International Studies Review is 1.631
· The 2016-2017 Journal Impact IF of International Studies Review is 1.259
· The 2015-2016 Journal Impact IF of International Studies Review is 1.283
· The 2014-2015 Journal Impact IF of International Studies Review is 0.878
· The 2013-2014 Journal Impact IF of International Studies Review is 0.935
· The 2012-2013 Journal Impact IF of International Studies Review is 1.063
· The 2011-2012 Journal Impact IF of International Studies Review is 0.74

Publications Cites Dataset

Year Publications Citations
Year Publications Citations
1997 7 0
1998 15 0
1999 54 8
2000 32 36
2001 24 91
2002 28 152
2003 95 493
2004 99 649
2005 123 509
2006 106 476
2007 109 805
2008 106 811
2009 92 1260
2010 91 1253
2011 115 1432
2012 91 1659
2013 69 1765
2014 110 2061
2015 90 1738
2016 91 1831
2017 73 1741
2018 87 1602
2019 73 2124
2020 132 2537
2021 1 207
Publications Cites Dataset

· The International Studies Review has published 7 reports and received 0 citations in 1997.
· The International Studies Review has published 15 reports and received 0 citations in 1998.
· The International Studies Review has published 54 reports and received 8 citations in 1999.
· The International Studies Review has published 32 reports and received 36 citations in 2000.
· The International Studies Review has published 24 reports and received 91 citations in 2001.
· The International Studies Review has published 28 reports and received 152 citations in 2002.
· The International Studies Review has published 95 reports and received 493 citations in 2003.
· The International Studies Review has published 99 reports and received 649 citations in 2004.
· The International Studies Review has published 123 reports and received 509 citations in 2005.
· The International Studies Review has published 106 reports and received 476 citations in 2006.
· The International Studies Review has published 109 reports and received 805 citations in 2007.
· The International Studies Review has published 106 reports and received 811 citations in 2008.
· The International Studies Review has published 92 reports and received 1260 citations in 2009.
· The International Studies Review has published 91 reports and received 1253 citations in 2010.
· The International Studies Review has published 115 reports and received 1432 citations in 2011.
· The International Studies Review has published 91 reports and received 1659 citations in 2012.
· The International Studies Review has published 69 reports and received 1765 citations in 2013.
· The International Studies Review has published 110 reports and received 2061 citations in 2014.
· The International Studies Review has published 90 reports and received 1738 citations in 2015.
· The International Studies Review has published 91 reports and received 1831 citations in 2016.
· The International Studies Review has published 73 reports and received 1741 citations in 2017.
· The International Studies Review has published 87 reports and received 1602 citations in 2018.
· The International Studies Review has published 73 reports and received 2124 citations in 2019.
· The International Studies Review has published 132 reports and received 2537 citations in 2020.
· The International Studies Review has published 1 reports and received 207 citations in 2021.
· The total publications of International Studies Review is 1913.
· The total citations of International Studies Review is 25240.

What is Impact Factor?

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly average number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factor values are often deemed to be more important, or carry more intrinsic prestige in their respective fields, than those with lower values.

International Studies Review | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones. According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.” Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. The Impact Factor of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. It is frequently used as a Metric for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher Impact Factor are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The International Studies Review Impact Factor IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2020) by papers published in the International Studies Review during the two preceding years (2018-2019). Note that 2020 Impact Factor are reported in 2021; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2020 publications have been processed by the indexing agency. New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1, are known zero values. Journals that are indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have been indexed for three years. Occasionally, Journal Citation Reports assigns an impact factor to new journals with less than two years of indexing, based on partial citation data. The calculation always uses two complete and known years of item counts, but for new titles one of the known counts is zero. Annuals and other irregular publications sometimes publish no items in a particular year, affecting the count. The impact factor relates to a specific time period; it is possible to calculate it for any desired period. In addition to the 2-year Impact Factor, the 3-year Impact Factor, 4-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Real-Time Impact Factor can provide further insights and factors into the impact of International Studies Review.

History

The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Impact factors are calculated yearly starting from 1975 for journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). ISI was acquired by Thomson Scientific & Healthcare in 1992, and became known as Thomson ISI. In 2018, Thomson ISI was sold to Onex Corporation and Baring Private Equity Asia. They founded a new corporation, Clarivate, which is now the publisher of the JCR.

Use

The impact factor is used to compare different journals within a certain field. The Web of Science indexes more than 11,500 science and social science journals. Journal impact factors are often used to evaluate the merit of individual articles and individual researchers. This use of impact factors was summarised by Hoeffel:

Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation. Experience has shown that in each specialty the best journals are those in which it is most difficult to have an article accepted, and these are the journals that have a high impact factor. Most of these journals existed long before the impact factor was devised. The use of impact factor as a measure of quality is widespread because it fits well with the opinion we have in each field of the best journals in our specialty....In conclusion, prestigious journals publish papers of high level. Therefore, their impact factor is high, and not the contrary.

Eugene Garfield

In brief, Impact factors may be used by:
  • Authors to decide where to submit an article for publication.
  • Libraries to make collection development decisions
  • Academic departments to assess academic productivity
  • Academic departments to make decisions on promotion and tenure.
As impact factors are a journal-level metric, rather than an article- or individual-level metric, this use is controversial. Garfield agrees with Hoeffel,but warns about the "misuse in evaluating individuals" because there is "a wide variation [of citations] from article to article within a single journal". Other things to consider about Impact Factors:
  • Many journals do not have an impact factor.
  • The impact factor cannot assess the quality of individual articles. Even if citations were evenly distributed among articles, the impact factor would only measure the interests of other researchers in an article, not its importance and usefulness.
  • Only research articles, technical notes and reviews are “citable” items. Editorials, letters, news items and meeting abstracts are “non-citable items”.
  • Only a small percentage of articles are highly cited and they are found in a small subset of journals. This small proportion accounts for a large percentage of citations.
  • Controversial papers, such as those based on fraudulent data, may be highly cited, distorting the impact factor of a journal.
  • Citation bias may exist. For example, English language resources may be favoured. Authors may cite their own work.
Moreover, informed and careful use of these impact data is essential, and should be based on a thorough understanding of the methodology used to generate impact factors. There are controversial aspects of using impact factors:
  • It is not clear whether the number of times a paper is cited measures its actual quality.
  • Some databases that calculate impact factors fail to incorporate publications including textbooks, handbooks and reference books.
  • Certain disciplines have low numbers of journals and usage. Therefore, one should only compare journals or researchers within the same discipline.
  • Review articles normally are cited more often and therefore can skew results.
  • Self-citing may also skew results.
  • Some resources used to calculate impact factors have inadequate international coverage.
  • Editorial policies can artificially inflate an impact factor.
Impact factors have often been used in advancement and tenure decision-making. Many recognize that this is a coarse tool for such important decisions, and that a multitude of factors should be taken into account in these deliberations. When considering the use of the impact factor (IF), keep these aspects in mind:
  • IF analysis is limited to citations from the journals indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge. Currently, the Web of Science indexes only 8621 journals across the full breadth of the sciences, and just 3121 in the social sciences.
  • A high IF/citation rate says nothing about the quality -- or even, validity -- of the references being cited. Notorious or even retracted articles often attract a lot of attention, hence a high number of citations. The notority related to the first publication on "cold fusion" is one such example.
  • Journals that publish more "review articles" are often found near the top of the rankings. While not known for publishing new, creative findings, these individual articles tend to be heavily cited.
  • The IF measures the average number of citations to articles in the journal -- given this, a small number of highly-cited articles will skew the figure.
  • It takes several years for new journals to be added to the list of titles indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge, so these newer titles will be under-represented.
  • It's alleged that journal editors have learned to "game" the system, encouraging authors to cite their works previously published in the same journal.
Comparing Journals Across Disciplines? Not a good idea! Using Impact Factors within a given discipline should only be done with great care, as described above. Using impact factor data to compare journals across disciplines is even more problematic. Here are some of the reasons:
  • Disciplines where older literature is still referenced, such as Chemistry and Mathematics, offer challenges to the methodolgy since older citations (older than two years) are not used to calculate the impact factor for a given journal. (Five-year impact factor analysis, which can be calculated using the Journal Citation Index database, helps smooth out this problem only to some degree.)
  • Different disciplines have different practices regarding tendency to cite larger numbers of references. Higher overall citation rates will bump upward impact factor measurements.
  • Where it's common for large numbers of authors to collaborate on a single paper, such as in Physics, the tendency of authors to cite themselves (and in this case, more authors) will result in increased citation rates.

Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor

Pros:

  • A vetted, established metric for measuring journal impact within a discipline.
  • Designed to eliminate bias based on journal size and frequency.
Cons:
  • Individual articles makes an uneven contribution to overall Impact Factor.
  • Impact Factor does not account for certain things, things like context (postive or negative citaion) and intentionality (self-citation).
  • The metric is proprietary to and bound by the contents of the Thomson Reuters database.
  • Citations, on which the Impact Factor is based, count for less than 1% of an article's overall use.

Criticism

Numerous critiques have been made regarding the use of impact factors. A 2007 study noted that the most fundamental flaw is that impact factors present the mean of data that are not normally distributed, and suggested that it would be more appropriate to present the median of these data. There is also a more general debate on the validity of the impact factor as a measure of journal importance and the effect of policies that editors may adopt to boost their impact factor (perhaps to the detriment of readers and writers). Other criticism focuses on the effect of the impact factor on behavior of scholars, editors and other stakeholders. Others have made more general criticisms, arguing that emphasis on impact factor results from negative influence of neoliberal policies on academia claiming that what is needed is not just replacement of the impact factor with more sophisticated metrics for science publications but also discussion on the social value of research assessment and the growing precariousness of scientific careers in higher education.
Experts stress that there are limitations in using impact factors to evaluate a scholar's work. There are many reasons cited for not relying on impact factor alone to evaluate the output of a particular individual. Among these are the following:

  • A single factor is not sufficient for evaluating an author's work.
  • Journal values are meaningless unless compared within the same discipline. Impact factors vary among disciplines.
  • The impact factor was originally devised to show the impact of a specific journal, not a specific scholar. The quality and impact of the author's work may extend beyond the impact of a particular journal.
According to Jim Testa, a researcher for ThomsonReuters Scientific, the most widespread misuse of the Impact Factor is to evaluate the work of an individual author (instead of a journal). "To say that because a researcher is publishing in a certain journal, he or she is more influential or deserves more credit is not necessarily true. There are many other variables to consider." (interview 6/26/2008 in Thomson Reuters blog entry)

International Studies Review
Journal Profile

About

The International Studies Review (ISR) is a journal of the International Studies Association. It provides a window on current trends and research in international studies worldwide. Published four times a year, ISR is intended to help (a) scholars engage in the kind of dialogue and debate that will shape the field of international studies in the future; (b) graduate and undergraduate students understand major issues in international studies and identify promising opportunities for research; and (c) educators keep up with new ideas and research. The International Studies Review is a quarterly peer-reviewed academic journal published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Studies Association. Former editors-in-chief include Kelly Kadera (University of Iowa) and Laura Sjoberg (University of Florida). The journal covers research in international studies. It was established in 1957 as Mershon International Studies Review and obtained its current title in 1999, with volume numbering restarting at 1.

Highly Cited Keywords

ISSN
1521-9488
ISSN

The ISSN of International Studies Review is 1521-9488 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

ISSN (Online)
1468-2486
ISSN (Online)

The ISSN (Online) of International Studies Review is 1468-2486 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Publisher

International Studies Review is published by Oxford University Press .

Publication Frequency
-
Publication Frequency

International Studies Review publishes reports - .

Coverage
1999-2019
Coverage

The Publication History of International Studies Review covers 1999-2019 .

Open Access
NO
Open Access

International Studies Review is Subscription-based (non-OA) Journal. Publishers own the rights to the articles in their journals. Anyone who wants to read the articles should pay by individual or institution to access the articles. Anyone who wants to use the articles in any way must obtain permission from the publishers.

Publication Fee
Publication Fee

There is no publication fee for submiting manuscript to International Studies Review. International Studies Review is Subscription-based (non-OA) Journal. Publishers own the rights to the articles in their journals. Anyone who wants to read the articles should pay by individual or institution to access the articles.

Language
-
Language

The language of International Studies Review is - .

Country/Region
United Kingdom
Country/Region

The publisher of International Studies Review is Oxford University Press , which locates in United Kingdom .

Selected Articles

Full Title Authors
Full Title Authors
Uncertainty Hawks, Enemy Images, and the Failure of Strategy Jared Morgan McKinney · Jared Morgan McKinney
An Historical Comparison of Religious Revival Sandra Halperin · Sandra Halperin
Connecting Public Diplomacy and Foreign Policy Kadir Jun Ayhan · Kadir Jun Ayhan
Reflecting aPluralist Turnin International Relations Chaeyoung Yong · Chaeyoung Yong
The Emergence of Sovereignty : More than a Question of Time Julia Costa López · Benjamin de Carvalho · Benjamin de Carvalho
Liberalism and Its Alternatives, Again John M. Owen · John M. Owen
Thinking about Change: American Theorizing and Chinese Reasoning on World Politics Kai He · Steve Chan · Steve Chan
The Chessboard and the Web: Strategies of Connection in a Networked World Marcus Walsh-Führing · Marcus Walsh-Führing
Merum imperium and sovereignty in the later Middle Ages Julia Costa López · Julia Costa López
Erratum toA Rose by Any Other Name: On Ways of Approaching Discourse Analysis Caterina Carta · Caterina Carta
Is Peaceful Change in World Politics Always Desirable? A Neoclassical Realist Perspective Jeffrey W. Taliaferro · Steven E. Lobell · Norrin M. Ripsman · Norrin M. Ripsman
Drone Proliferation and the Challenge of Regulating Dual-Use Technologies Marcus Schulzke · Marcus Schulzke
Moving Beyond the CNN Effect or Stuck in the Middle? How Relational Sociology Remaps Media and Security Studies Adam Lusk · Adam Lusk
The Problem of Peaceful Change Revisited: From the End of the Cold War to the Uncertainties of a Post-Liberal Order Arie M. Kacowicz · Benjamin Miller · Benjamin Miller
Corrigendum toThe Schools of Thought Problem in International Relations Joseph M Greico · Joseph M Greico
Agential Constructivism and Change in World Politics J. Andrew Grant · J. Andrew Grant
New Perspectives on Rising Powers and Global Governance: Status and Clubs Deborah Welch Larson · Deborah Welch Larson
Why Govern Climate Engineering? A Preliminary Framework for Demand-Based Governance Sikina Jinnah · Sikina Jinnah
Theorizing Collective Trauma in International Political Economy Adam B Lerner · Adam B Lerner
Building a Theory of Change in International Relations: Pathways of Disruptive and Incremental Change in World Politics Aseema Sinha · Aseema Sinha
Change in International Politics: The View from High Altitude Kalevi Holsti · Kalevi Holsti
Contraria sunt Complementa: Global Entanglement and the Constitution of Difference K.M. Fierke · K.M. Fierke
What Can Russia Teach Us about Change? Status-Seeking as a Catalyst for Transformation in International Politics Andrej Krickovic · Yuval Weber · Yuval Weber
Cue Theory and International Trust in Europe: The EU as a Proxy for Trust in the UN Iasonas Lamprianou · Giorgos Charalambous · Giorgos Charalambous
Assessing Change in World Politics T. V. Paul · T. V. Paul
The Impact of Environmental Cooperation on Peacemaking: Definitions, Mechanisms, and Empirical Evidence Tobias Ide · Tobias Ide
Change Through Visibility: The Transnational and Domestic Politics of LGBT Rights in Europe Safia Swimelar · Safia Swimelar
Dissecting the Digital World: A Review of the Construction and Constitution of Cyber Conflict Research Christopher Whyte · Christopher Whyte
Comparative Exceptionalism: Universality and Particularity in Foreign Policy Discourses Johannes Plagemann · Nicola Nymalm · Nicola Nymalm
The Necessity of Research-Informed International Relations: Announcing a New Editorial Team for International Studies Review Amanda Murdie · Andrew P. Owsiak · Naji Bsisu · Sam R Bell · K. Chad Clay · Nicole Detraz · Dursun Peksen · Timothy M Peterson · Timothy M Peterson
Global Governance: A Struggle over Universal Values Vincent Pouliot · Jean-Philippe Thérien · Jean-Philippe Thérien
Corrigendum toLegal Pluralism in Theory and Practice Geoffrey Swenson · Geoffrey Swenson
Sexual Violence and Violent Sex in Armed Conflicts Maria Tanyag · Maria Tanyag
Reification in IR: The Process and Consequences of Reifying the Idea of International Society Katarzyna Kaczmarska · Katarzyna Kaczmarska
The Apparent Decline of the IR Paradigms: Examining Patterns of Publications, Perceptions, and Citations Stephen M. Saideman · Stephen M. Saideman
A Rose by Any Other Name: On Ways of Approaching Discourse Analysis Caterina Carta · Caterina Carta
The International Relations of East Asia: A New Research Prospectus Rosemary Foot · Evelyn Goh · Evelyn Goh
The Second Great Debate Revisited: Exploring the Impact of the Qualitative-Quantitative Divide in International Relations Quan Li · Quan Li
Get your Act(ors) Together! Theorizing Agency in Global Governance Matthias Hofferberth · Matthias Hofferberth
Lethal Artificial Intelligence and Change: The Future of International Peace and Security Denise Garcia · Denise Garcia
The Potential for Fundamental Change in World Politics Neta C. Crawford · Neta C. Crawford
Understanding Countries Policy Preferences Toward Taiwan Xiaoming Huang · Xiaoming Huang
Forum: In the Beginning there was No Word (for It): Terms, Concepts, and Early Sovereignty Julia Costa López · Julia Costa López
Cycles in world politics Mary Kaldor · Mary Kaldor
International Political Economy and Renewable Energy: Hydroelectric Power and the Resource Curse Kathleen J. Hancock · Benjamin K. Sovacool · Benjamin K. Sovacool
The Transitional Justice and Foreign Policy Nexus: The Inefficient Causation of State Ontological Security-Seeking Maria Mälksoo · Maria Mälksoo
An IPS-IPE contribution: unpacking the politics of regionalism: Part of the Forum International Political Sociology meets International Political Economy Elisa Lopez Lucia · Elisa Lopez Lucia
In Search for Peace: New Approach to Violence in Latin America Sebastián Sclofsky · Sebastián Sclofsky
Interrogating the Postcolonial: On the Limits of Freedom, Subalternity, and Hegemonic Knowledge Alina Sajed · Alina Sajed
The Three Worlds of Social Democracy: A Global View Elaine Coburn · Elaine Coburn
Bringing the Middle Ages back in : William Bain, ed. 2017. Medieval Foundations of International Relations. Abingdon: Routledge Julia Costa López · Julia Costa López
Toward a vernacular security studies: origins, interlocutors, contributions and challenges Lee Jarvis · Lee Jarvis
Beyond Secular Democracy: Religion, Politics, and Modernity Jeremy Menchik · Jeremy Menchik
Punish or Persuade? The Compellence Logic of International Criminal Court Intervention in Cases of Ongoing Civilian Violence David Mendeloff · David Mendeloff
The Importance of Narrative for Bringing International Attention to Wartime Sexual Violence Sabrina Karim · Sabrina Karim
Corrigendum toVan Gennep Meets Ontological (In)Security: A Processual Approach to Ontological Security in Migration Orit Gazit · Orit Gazit
The Strategic Effects of Time and Uncertainty Mark David Nieman · Mark David Nieman
Actors, Not Markets: Bringing Corporate Power Back in International Studies Milan Babic · Milan Babic
Racializing Religion: Constructing Colonial Identities in the Syrian Provinces in the Nineteenth Century Andrew Delatolla · Joanne Yao · Joanne Yao
Critique and Alternativity in International Relations Gëzim Visoka · Gëzim Visoka
The Field of Peacebuilding Laura J. Shepherd · Laura J. Shepherd
The Sociology of Knowledge as Postphilosophical Epistemology: Out of IRsSocially ConstructedIdealism Inanna Hamati-Ataya · Inanna Hamati-Ataya
Exploring the Microfoundations of the Gender Equality Peace Hypothesis Reed M. Wood · Mark D. Ramirez · Mark D. Ramirez
Challenging the Ontological Boundaries of Religious Practices in International Relations Scholarship Tanya B Schwarz · Tanya B Schwarz
A Peaceful Prospect or a Threat to Global Order: How Asian Youth View a Rising China Yida Zhai · Yida Zhai
Trends in Terrorists Weapons Adoption and the Study Thereof Nicole Alexandra Tishler · Nicole Alexandra Tishler
Refugees Are Not Weapons: TheWeapons of Mass MigrationMetaphor and Its Implications Lev Marder · Lev Marder
Corrigendum toInternational Political Economy and Renewable Energy: Hydroelectric Power and the Resource Curse Kathleen J. Hancock · Benjamin K. Sovacool · Benjamin K. Sovacool
Confusion, Seduction, Failure: Emotions as Reflexive Knowledge in Conflict Settings Jenny Hedström · Jenny Hedström
Book Review of Seizing Power: The Strategic Logic of Military Coups Jeremy C Graham · Jeremy C Graham
Explaining the Long Peace: Why von Neumann (and Schelling) Got It Wrong Frank C. Zagare · Frank C. Zagare
Migrant Agency as Challenge to State-Centrism in Security Studies Annick T. R. Wibben · Annick T. R. Wibben
Regime Security and Regional Cooperation Among Weak States Atena Ş Feraru · Atena Ş Feraru
Legal Pluralism in Theory and Practice Geoffrey Swenson · Geoffrey Swenson
Contested Legitimacy and Institutional Change: Unpacking the Dynamics of Institutional Legitimacy Dane Imerman · Dane Imerman
Global Governance: Three Futures Miles Kahler · Miles Kahler
National Identity and Territory in a World of Changing Scale Steven V. Miller · Steven V. Miller
Van Gennep Meets Ontological (In)Security: A Processual Approach to Ontological Security in Migration Orit Gazit · Orit Gazit
Buffers, Not Bridges: Rethinking Multilateralism and the Resilience of Japan-South Korea Friction Van Jackson · Van Jackson
The Women, Peace, and Security Agenda and Feminist Institutionalism: A Research Agenda Jennifer Thomson · Jennifer Thomson
Do IR Concepts Impact Global Politics? Critical Imaginations and International Relations Michael Strange · Michael Strange
Climate Wars? A Systematic Review of Empirical Analyses on the Links between Climate Change and Violent Conflict Kendra Sakaguchi · Anil Varughese · Graeme Auld · Graeme Auld
Problematizing Global Challenges: Recalibrating theInterin IR-TheoryInter Alia: On Global Orders, Practices, and TheoryThe Inter as Liminal Spaces: Prudence, Transience, and AffectionDialoguing about Dialogues: On the Purpose, Procedure and Product of Dialogues in Inter-National Relations TheoryInterpreting International RelationsThe Narrative of Academic Dominance: How to Overcome Performing theCore-PeripheryDivide Gunther Hellmann · Morten Valbjørn · Morten Valbjørn
Bringing Susan Strange Back In (again) Christopher May · Christopher May
Representing Trauma, Making Community—Emotionally Andrew A.G. Ross · Andrew A.G. Ross
Reconciling Statistics and Interpretation in the Study of National Identity Dragana Svraka · Dragana Svraka
Climate Change and Violent Conflict in East Africa: Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Research to Probe the Mechanisms Sebastian van Baalen · Malin Mobjörk · Malin Mobjörk
Deviance and Uncertainty in the International System Barak Mendelsohn · Barak Mendelsohn
Authoritarian on the Defensive Thomas Ambrosio · Thomas Ambrosio
Intersocietal Dynamics: Writing and Teaching Post-Eurocentric Histories of Capitalism David L. Blaney · David L. Blaney
From Wealth to Power: State-Business Relations and Chinese Economic Statecraft Chi-hung Wei · Chi-hung Wei
Why Resist? The Sources of Violent and Nonviolent Political Action Ross James Gildea · Ross James Gildea
More Data, New Problems: Audiences, Ahistoricity, and Selection Bias in Terrorism and Insurgency Research Charles W Mahoney · Charles W Mahoney
Foucault and Marx in International Relations: Toward a More Equal Marriage? Nicholas Kiersey · Nicholas Kiersey
The Importance of Leaders Experience and Attributes Marijke Breuning · Marijke Breuning
Frozen Conflicts and Internal Dynamics of De Facto States: Perspectives and Directions for Research Magdalena Dembinska · Aurélie Campana · Aurélie Campana
Beyond statist paradigms : socio-spatial positionality and diaspora mobilization in international relations Maria Koinova · Maria Koinova
A Bridge to Peace? A Framework for Health Engagement During Conflict Valerie Percival · Valerie Percival
Putin, the State, and War: The Causes of Russias Near Abroad Assertion Revisited Elias Götz · Elias Götz
The Case for Comparative Regional Analysis in International Politics Thomas J. Volgy · Paul Bezerra · Jacob Cramer · J. Patrick Rhamey · J. Patrick Rhamey
Harmonious World: It Seems It Was Only a Dream Niall Duggan · Niall Duggan
Race and International Relations Alexander D. Barder · Alexander D. Barder
NGOs as Norm Takers: Insider–Outsider Networks as Translators of Norms Andrea Schneiker · Andrea Schneiker
Reorienting IR: Ontological Entanglement, Agency, and Ethics Zanotti Laura · Zanotti Laura
Is Just War Doctrine Still Relevant Allison Stanger · Allison Stanger
Can BRICS Shape a New World Order Harsh V. Pant · Harsh V. Pant
A Not-So-Fateful Triangle? Latin America, China, and the United States Kevin Funk · Kevin Funk
A Time to Weep: Humanity at the Brink of Global Destruction Evgenia Ilieva · Evgenia Ilieva
How the Great Powers Engender States Marc Sanjaume-Calvet · Marc Sanjaume-Calvet
Discourse and Emotions in International Relations Simon Koschut · Todd H. Hall · Reinhard Wolf · Ty Solomon · Emma Hutchison · Roland Bleiker · Roland Bleiker
Navigating beyond the Eurofetishist Frontier of Critical IR Theory: Exploring the complex landscapes of non-Western agency John M. Hobson · Alina Sajed · Alina Sajed
My Review of Iraq and the Crimes of Aggressive War: The Legal Cynicism of Criminal Militarism Isaac Kfir · Isaac Kfir
International Peacebuilding and Local Success: Assumptions and Effectiveness Séverine Autesserre · Séverine Autesserre
An Experimental Agenda for Securitization Theory Stéphane J. Baele · Catarina P. Thomson · Catarina P. Thomson
When Less Is More: Constructing a Parsimonious Concept of Interstate Peace for Quantitative Analysis Lukas Kasten · Lukas Kasten
Political speech in fantastical worlds Paul Kirby · Paul Kirby
Mind the Gap: The Politics of Child Protection and the Challenge to Human Security Helen Brocklehurst · Helen Brocklehurst
Agency, Hegemony, and the International Relations of the Americas Thomas J. Nisley · Thomas J. Nisley
Seeing Black in Latin America Mauro J. Caraccioli · Mauro J. Caraccioli
What Image Does IR Project? Chess, a Visual Metaphor for IR Ákos Kopper · Ákos Kopper
Forum:A Bridge Too Far? On the Impact of Worldly Relevance on International Relations Andrew R. Hom · Andrew R. Hom
A Would-Be Empire: German Colonial History Comes of Age Michelle Moyd · Michelle Moyd
The Reconfiguration of Authority in Global Climate Governance Thomas Hickmann · Thomas Hickmann
How Trading Similar Goods Makes States More Cooperative Mark J. C. Crescenzi · Mark J. C. Crescenzi
Relating Diplomacy to International Relations Paul Musgrave · Paul Musgrave
Domestic Interests and Exchange Rate Policy Thomas Oatley · Thomas Oatley
Toward Global IPE: The Overlooked Significance of the Haya-Mariátegui Debate Eric Helleiner · Antulio Rosales · Antulio Rosales
Much Ventured, Much Gained: The US Innovation State Herman Schwartz · Herman Schwartz
Agents of Change: How International Courts Alter International Politics Oumar Ba · Oumar Ba
Tangoing with Schumpeter: The Security Politics of Science & Technology Matthew Brummer · Matthew Brummer
The Diffusion of Intercountry Adoption Marijke Breuning · Marijke Breuning
Foreign Policy Stories from the White House Jelena Subotic · Jelena Subotic
Introduction: Exploring Peace Thomas R. Guarrieri · A. Cooper Drury · Amanda Murdie · Amanda Murdie
An Ontology of Peace: Landscapes of Conflict and Cooperation with Application to Colombia Susanna Campbell · Michael G. Findley · Kyosuke Kikuta · Kyosuke Kikuta
Measuring Peace: Comparability, commensurability and complementarity using bottom up indicators Pamina Firchow · Roger Mac Ginty · Roger Mac Ginty
Beyond Transitional Justice: Peace, Governance, and Rule of Law Chandra Lekha Sriram · Chandra Lekha Sriram
Social Network Analysis in the Study of Terrorism and Insurgency: From Organization to Politics Steven Thomas Zech · Michael Gabbay · Michael Gabbay
Internal, Interactive, and Institutional Factors: A Unified Framework for Understanding International Nongovernmental Organizations Andrew Heiss · Tana Johnson · Tana Johnson
Understanding Resilience in International Relations: The Non-Aligned Movement and Ontological Security Marco Antonio Vieira · Marco Antonio Vieira
Affirmative Balance of the Singapore–Taiwan Relationship: A Bilateral Perspective on the Relational Turn in International Relations Chih-Yu Shih · Chih-Yu Shih
A Bridge too far Andrew R. Hom · Brent J. Steele · Patrick Thaddeus Jackson · Saara Särmä · Harry D. Gould · Piki Ish-Shalom · Daniel J. Levine · Daniel J. Levine
Securing Methods, Practicing Critique: A Review of Methods and Critical Security Studies Lauren Wilcox · Lauren Wilcox
Bringing Womens Voices Back In: Conducting Narrative Analysis in IR Ayelet Harel-Shalev · Shir Daphna-Tekoah · Shir Daphna-Tekoah
Uncertainty and War Duration Zachary C. Shirkey · Zachary C. Shirkey
Hypotheses on Religion in the Military Ron E. Hassner · Ron E. Hassner
Diversity and Empathy Peter J. Katzenstein · Peter J. Katzenstein
Rethinking EconomicSanctions Shmuel Nili · Shmuel Nili
Rethinking Roles: Reflexive Role Ascription and Performativity in International Relations Bernardo Teles Fazendeiro · Bernardo Teles Fazendeiro
The IR of the Beholder: Examining Global IR Using the 2014 TRIP Survey Wiebke Wemheuer-Vogelaar · Nicholas J. Bell · Mariana Navarrete Morales · Michael J. Tierney · Michael J. Tierney
Inclusion and Exclusion Peter Vale · Peter Vale
Global IR Meets Global History: Sovereignty, Modernity, and the International Systems Expansion in the Indian Ocean Region Andrew Phillips · Andrew Phillips
Pragmatism as Ontology, Not (Just) Epistemology: Exploring the Full Horizon of Pragmatism as an Approach to IR Theory Simon Frankel Pratt · Simon Frankel Pratt
International Relations from the South: A Regional Research Agenda for Global IR Melisa Deciancio · Melisa Deciancio
Practical Concerns and Power Considerations Shiping Tang · Shiping Tang
Could IR Be Different Barry Buzan · Barry Buzan
A Relational Theory of World Politics Yaqing Qin · Yaqing Qin
Human Agency, Reason, and Justice Farid Mirbagheri · Farid Mirbagheri
Beyond Critique: How to Study Global IR? Andrew Hurrell · Andrew Hurrell
Dialogue of civilizations in a multipolar world: toward a multicivilizational-multiplex world order Fabio Petito · Fabio Petito
Editorial Note: International Studies Review Kelly M. Kadera · Laura Sjoberg · Laura Sjoberg
A Critical Contribution to theSecurity-ReligionNexus: Going Beyond the Analytical Clara Eroukhmanoff · Clara Eroukhmanoff
One Everyday Step at a Time Shirin M. Rai · Shirin M. Rai
The New Local: Reappraising Peacebuilding from the Grassroots Kate Roll · Kate Roll
Theorizing Diplomacy as Agency Marcus Holmes · Marcus Holmes
Knowledge Is Power: Challenging IRs Eurocentric Narrative J. Ann Tickner · J. Ann Tickner
The Rise of Transnational Governance as a Field of Study Charles Roger · Peter Dauvergne · Peter Dauvergne
African Agency in R2P: Interventions by African Union and ECOWAS in Mali, Cote Divoire, and Libya Kwesi Aning · Fiifi Edu-Afful · Fiifi Edu-Afful
Drawing Out the Leviathan: Kenneth Waltz, Hobbes, and the Neorealist Theory of the State David Polansky · David Polansky
Advancing Global IR: Challenges, Contentions, and Contributions Amitav Acharya · Amitav Acharya
Contrapuntal Readingas a Method, an Ethos, and a Metaphor for Global IR Pinar Bilgin · Pinar Bilgin
Envisioning the Invisible: Nonstate Actors in International Affairs Tana Johnson · Tana Johnson
The International Politics of Climate Engineering: A Review and Prospectus for International Relations Joshua Horton · Jesse L Reynolds · Jesse L Reynolds
Sites of Knowledge (Re-)Production: Toward an Institutional Sociology of International Relations Scholarship Félix Grenier · Jonas Hagmann · Jonas Hagmann
Normative Power in the EU and ASEAN: Why They Diverge Jiajie He · Jiajie He
Engaging Rising Powers: Lessons from India Sandra Destradi · Sandra Destradi
How China Understands Public Diplomacy: The Importance of National Image for National Interests Falk Hartig · Falk Hartig
Human-Security States to the Rescue Meghana V. Nayak · Meghana V. Nayak
Do INGOs Work? An Empirical Investigation of Human Security Effects Cecilia Jacob · Alana Moore · Alana Moore
War and Peace and Women John Wilson · John Wilson
States + War + Movements = Repression Jack Andrew Goldstone · Jack Andrew Goldstone
An ethnographic perspective on educating state subjects in Russia Martin Müller · Martin Müller
Toward the political economy of plural policing: Taking stock of a burgeoning literature Fabio Scarpello · Fabio Scarpello
TheNewNormal: Instability Risk Assessment in an Uncertainty-Based Strategic Environment Lt Chris C. Bosley · Lt Chris C. Bosley
Is China Building an Empire in Rural Africa Lina Benabdallah · Lina Benabdallah
Symbols before Reason: Explaining Ethnic Politics R. William Ayres · R. William Ayres
Critical Investigations intoHuman, All Too HumanIR Asli Calkivik · Asli Calkivik
Gender and Nationalism in Bosnia Chip Gagnon · Chip Gagnon
Id Rather Be the Load Than the Fulcrum: Leveraging Needs Perspective Felicia Pratto · Felicia Pratto
Transcending Borders: New Security Concerns in the Americas Brigitte Weiffen · Brigitte Weiffen
Not Learning Lessons Roger Mac Ginty · Roger Mac Ginty
Emotions as Moral Judgments: Ethics, Science, and Global Poverty K.M. Fierke · K.M. Fierke
Questioning the Transparency Mantra in Green Governance Saleem H. Ali · Saleem H. Ali
Challenges to Peace Anke Hoeffler · Anke Hoeffler
Thinking About the Role of Popular Culture in International Conflicts Galia Press-Barnathan · Galia Press-Barnathan
Small States, Great Power? Gaining Influence Through Intrinsic, Derivative, and Collective Power Tom Long · Tom Long
A Sociological Analysis of the Decline of American IR Theory Ido Oren · Ido Oren
Between the International and the Everyday: Geopolitics and Imaginaries of Home David Shim · David Shim
Reforming NGO Accountability: Supply vs. Demand-Driven Models Christopher L. Pallas · Amanda Guidero · Amanda Guidero
Bringing the State Back Into the Empire Turn: Piracy and the Layered Sovereignty of the Eighteenth Century Atlantic Mark Shirk · Mark Shirk
Follow the Partners: A Relational Ontology for NGO Studies George E. Mitchell · George E. Mitchell
The Anguish of Critique/The Critique of Anguish Ian Bruff · Ian Bruff
Corporate Nationality and the Breaking of State Contracts Christopher May · Christopher May
Beyond the Responsibility to Protect Debra L. DeLaet · Debra L. DeLaet
Human Being in World Politics: Between Zoē and Bios Joanna Rak · Joanna Rak
Uncommon Effects and Uncommon Causes Eric Grynaviski · Eric Grynaviski
Human Security in East Asia Derek McDougall · Derek McDougall
Induction and Deduction in International Relations: Squaring the Circle Between Theory and Evidence David Blagden · David Blagden
Who Are the Enemies? The Visual Framing of Enemies in Digital Games Brandon Valeriano · Philip Habel · Philip Habel

The Emergence of Sovereignty : More than a Question of Time
International Studies Review | 2018
Julia Costa López · Benjamin de Carvalho · Benjamin de Carvalho