International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development
Journal Impact IF - Analysis · Trend · Prediction · Ranking


New

Journal Impact IF

2019-2020

0.606

45.0%

Journal Impact IF Trend

Related Journals

Popular Journals

International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development

The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is 0.606, which is just updated in 2020.

International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development Impact Factor
Highest IF
0.606
Highest Journal Impact IF

The highest Journal Impact IF of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is 0.606.

Lowest IF
0.125
Lowest Journal Impact IF

The lowest Journal Impact IF of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is 0.125.

Total Growth Rate
384.8%
IF Total Growth Rate

The total growth rate of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development IF is 384.8%.

Annual Growth Rate
64.1%
IF Annual Growth Rate

The annual growth rate of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development IF is 64.1%.

Journal Impact IF Ranking

Subcategory Quartile Rank Percentile
Urban Studies Q2 79/200

Urban Studies 60%

Geography, Planning and Development Q2 328/679

Geography, Planning and Development 51%

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law Q3 203/333

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 39%

Journal Impact IF Ranking

· In the Urban Studies research field, the Quartile of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is Q2. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development has been ranked #79 over 200 related journals in the Urban Studies research category. The ranking percentile of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is around 60% in the field of Urban Studies.
· In the Geography, Planning and Development research field, the Quartile of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is Q2. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development has been ranked #328 over 679 related journals in the Geography, Planning and Development research category. The ranking percentile of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is around 51% in the field of Geography, Planning and Development.
· In the Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law research field, the Quartile of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is Q3. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development has been ranked #203 over 333 related journals in the Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law research category. The ranking percentile of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is around 39% in the field of Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law.

International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development Impact Factor 2020-2021 Prediction

International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development Impact Factor Predition System

International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development Impact Factor Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community.

Predict Check All Preditions
Total Publications
264
Total Citations
366

Annual Publication Volume

Annual Citation Record

International Collaboration Trend

Cited Documents Trend

Journal Impact IF History

Year Journal Impact IF
Year Journal Impact IF
2019-2020 0.606
2018-2019 0.418
2017-2018 0.38
2016-2017 0.378
2015-2016 0.25
2014-2015 0.125
2013-2014 -
2012-2013 -
2011-2012 -
Journal Impact IF History

· The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is 0.606
· The 2018-2019 Journal Impact IF of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is 0.418
· The 2017-2018 Journal Impact IF of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is 0.38
· The 2016-2017 Journal Impact IF of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is 0.378
· The 2015-2016 Journal Impact IF of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is 0.25
· The 2014-2015 Journal Impact IF of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is 0.125
The Journal Impact IF 2013-2014 of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is still under analysis. Stay Tuned!
The Journal Impact IF 2012-2013 of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is still under analysis. Stay Tuned!
The Journal Impact IF 2011-2012 of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is still under analysis. Stay Tuned!

Publications Cites Dataset

Year Publications Citations
Year Publications Citations
2013 18 1
2014 26 7
2015 32 16
2016 34 39
2017 35 63
2018 43 47
2019 47 84
2020 26 100
2021 3 9
Publications Cites Dataset

· The International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development has published 18 reports and received 1 citations in 2013.
· The International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development has published 26 reports and received 7 citations in 2014.
· The International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development has published 32 reports and received 16 citations in 2015.
· The International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development has published 34 reports and received 39 citations in 2016.
· The International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development has published 35 reports and received 63 citations in 2017.
· The International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development has published 43 reports and received 47 citations in 2018.
· The International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development has published 47 reports and received 84 citations in 2019.
· The International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development has published 26 reports and received 100 citations in 2020.
· The International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development has published 3 reports and received 9 citations in 2021.
· The total publications of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is 264.
· The total citations of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is 366.

What is Impact Factor?

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly average number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factor values are often deemed to be more important, or carry more intrinsic prestige in their respective fields, than those with lower values.

International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones. According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.” Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. The Impact Factor of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. It is frequently used as a Metric for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher Impact Factor are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development Impact Factor IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2020) by papers published in the International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development during the two preceding years (2018-2019). Note that 2020 Impact Factor are reported in 2021; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2020 publications have been processed by the indexing agency. New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1, are known zero values. Journals that are indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have been indexed for three years. Occasionally, Journal Citation Reports assigns an impact factor to new journals with less than two years of indexing, based on partial citation data. The calculation always uses two complete and known years of item counts, but for new titles one of the known counts is zero. Annuals and other irregular publications sometimes publish no items in a particular year, affecting the count. The impact factor relates to a specific time period; it is possible to calculate it for any desired period. In addition to the 2-year Impact Factor, the 3-year Impact Factor, 4-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Real-Time Impact Factor can provide further insights and factors into the impact of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development.

History

The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Impact factors are calculated yearly starting from 1975 for journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). ISI was acquired by Thomson Scientific & Healthcare in 1992, and became known as Thomson ISI. In 2018, Thomson ISI was sold to Onex Corporation and Baring Private Equity Asia. They founded a new corporation, Clarivate, which is now the publisher of the JCR.

Use

The impact factor is used to compare different journals within a certain field. The Web of Science indexes more than 11,500 science and social science journals. Journal impact factors are often used to evaluate the merit of individual articles and individual researchers. This use of impact factors was summarised by Hoeffel:

Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation. Experience has shown that in each specialty the best journals are those in which it is most difficult to have an article accepted, and these are the journals that have a high impact factor. Most of these journals existed long before the impact factor was devised. The use of impact factor as a measure of quality is widespread because it fits well with the opinion we have in each field of the best journals in our specialty....In conclusion, prestigious journals publish papers of high level. Therefore, their impact factor is high, and not the contrary.

Eugene Garfield

In brief, Impact factors may be used by:
  • Authors to decide where to submit an article for publication.
  • Libraries to make collection development decisions
  • Academic departments to assess academic productivity
  • Academic departments to make decisions on promotion and tenure.
As impact factors are a journal-level metric, rather than an article- or individual-level metric, this use is controversial. Garfield agrees with Hoeffel,but warns about the "misuse in evaluating individuals" because there is "a wide variation [of citations] from article to article within a single journal". Other things to consider about Impact Factors:
  • Many journals do not have an impact factor.
  • The impact factor cannot assess the quality of individual articles. Even if citations were evenly distributed among articles, the impact factor would only measure the interests of other researchers in an article, not its importance and usefulness.
  • Only research articles, technical notes and reviews are “citable” items. Editorials, letters, news items and meeting abstracts are “non-citable items”.
  • Only a small percentage of articles are highly cited and they are found in a small subset of journals. This small proportion accounts for a large percentage of citations.
  • Controversial papers, such as those based on fraudulent data, may be highly cited, distorting the impact factor of a journal.
  • Citation bias may exist. For example, English language resources may be favoured. Authors may cite their own work.
Moreover, informed and careful use of these impact data is essential, and should be based on a thorough understanding of the methodology used to generate impact factors. There are controversial aspects of using impact factors:
  • It is not clear whether the number of times a paper is cited measures its actual quality.
  • Some databases that calculate impact factors fail to incorporate publications including textbooks, handbooks and reference books.
  • Certain disciplines have low numbers of journals and usage. Therefore, one should only compare journals or researchers within the same discipline.
  • Review articles normally are cited more often and therefore can skew results.
  • Self-citing may also skew results.
  • Some resources used to calculate impact factors have inadequate international coverage.
  • Editorial policies can artificially inflate an impact factor.
Impact factors have often been used in advancement and tenure decision-making. Many recognize that this is a coarse tool for such important decisions, and that a multitude of factors should be taken into account in these deliberations. When considering the use of the impact factor (IF), keep these aspects in mind:
  • IF analysis is limited to citations from the journals indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge. Currently, the Web of Science indexes only 8621 journals across the full breadth of the sciences, and just 3121 in the social sciences.
  • A high IF/citation rate says nothing about the quality -- or even, validity -- of the references being cited. Notorious or even retracted articles often attract a lot of attention, hence a high number of citations. The notority related to the first publication on "cold fusion" is one such example.
  • Journals that publish more "review articles" are often found near the top of the rankings. While not known for publishing new, creative findings, these individual articles tend to be heavily cited.
  • The IF measures the average number of citations to articles in the journal -- given this, a small number of highly-cited articles will skew the figure.
  • It takes several years for new journals to be added to the list of titles indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge, so these newer titles will be under-represented.
  • It's alleged that journal editors have learned to "game" the system, encouraging authors to cite their works previously published in the same journal.
Comparing Journals Across Disciplines? Not a good idea! Using Impact Factors within a given discipline should only be done with great care, as described above. Using impact factor data to compare journals across disciplines is even more problematic. Here are some of the reasons:
  • Disciplines where older literature is still referenced, such as Chemistry and Mathematics, offer challenges to the methodolgy since older citations (older than two years) are not used to calculate the impact factor for a given journal. (Five-year impact factor analysis, which can be calculated using the Journal Citation Index database, helps smooth out this problem only to some degree.)
  • Different disciplines have different practices regarding tendency to cite larger numbers of references. Higher overall citation rates will bump upward impact factor measurements.
  • Where it's common for large numbers of authors to collaborate on a single paper, such as in Physics, the tendency of authors to cite themselves (and in this case, more authors) will result in increased citation rates.

Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor

Pros:

  • A vetted, established metric for measuring journal impact within a discipline.
  • Designed to eliminate bias based on journal size and frequency.
Cons:
  • Individual articles makes an uneven contribution to overall Impact Factor.
  • Impact Factor does not account for certain things, things like context (postive or negative citaion) and intentionality (self-citation).
  • The metric is proprietary to and bound by the contents of the Thomson Reuters database.
  • Citations, on which the Impact Factor is based, count for less than 1% of an article's overall use.

Criticism

Numerous critiques have been made regarding the use of impact factors. A 2007 study noted that the most fundamental flaw is that impact factors present the mean of data that are not normally distributed, and suggested that it would be more appropriate to present the median of these data. There is also a more general debate on the validity of the impact factor as a measure of journal importance and the effect of policies that editors may adopt to boost their impact factor (perhaps to the detriment of readers and writers). Other criticism focuses on the effect of the impact factor on behavior of scholars, editors and other stakeholders. Others have made more general criticisms, arguing that emphasis on impact factor results from negative influence of neoliberal policies on academia claiming that what is needed is not just replacement of the impact factor with more sophisticated metrics for science publications but also discussion on the social value of research assessment and the growing precariousness of scientific careers in higher education.
Experts stress that there are limitations in using impact factors to evaluate a scholar's work. There are many reasons cited for not relying on impact factor alone to evaluate the output of a particular individual. Among these are the following:

  • A single factor is not sufficient for evaluating an author's work.
  • Journal values are meaningless unless compared within the same discipline. Impact factors vary among disciplines.
  • The impact factor was originally devised to show the impact of a specific journal, not a specific scholar. The quality and impact of the author's work may extend beyond the impact of a particular journal.
According to Jim Testa, a researcher for ThomsonReuters Scientific, the most widespread misuse of the Impact Factor is to evaluate the work of an individual author (instead of a journal). "To say that because a researcher is publishing in a certain journal, he or she is more influential or deserves more credit is not necessarily true. There are many other variables to consider." (interview 6/26/2008 in Thomson Reuters blog entry)

International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development
Journal Profile

About

For investigation regarding the impact of planning policy on spatial planning implementation, International review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development (IRSPSD International) seeks to learn from researchers in an integrated multidisciplinary platform that reflects a variety of perspectives—such as economic development, social equality, and ecological protection—with a view to achieving a sustainable urban form. This international journal attempts to provide insights into the achievement of a sustainable urban form, through spatial planning and implementation; here, we focus on planning experiences at the levels of local cities and some metropolitan areas in the world, particularly in Asian countries. Submission are expected from multidisciplinary viewpoints encompassing land-use patterns, housing development, transportation, green design, and agricultural and ecological systems. None

Highly Cited Keywords

ISSN
-
ISSN

The ISSN of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is - . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

ISSN (Online)
2187-3666
ISSN (Online)

The ISSN (Online) of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is 2187-3666 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

Publisher
Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development
Publisher

International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is published by Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development .

Publication Frequency
-
Publication Frequency

International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development publishes reports - .

Coverage
2013 - Present
Coverage

The Publication History of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development covers 2013 - Present .

Open Access
NO
Open Access

International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is Subscription-based (non-OA) Journal. Publishers own the rights to the articles in their journals. Anyone who wants to read the articles should pay by individual or institution to access the articles. Anyone who wants to use the articles in any way must obtain permission from the publishers.

Publication Fee
Publication Fee

There is no publication fee for submiting manuscript to International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is Subscription-based (non-OA) Journal. Publishers own the rights to the articles in their journals. Anyone who wants to read the articles should pay by individual or institution to access the articles.

Language
English
Language

The language of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is English .

Country/Region
Japan
Country/Region

The publisher of International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development is Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development , which locates in Japan .

Selected Articles

Full Title Authors
Full Title Authors
Research and Practice on Disaster Prevention Planning in Villages based on Planning Support System: Overview: Potential public policies on spatial planning for sustainable urban forms A Case Study Qingming Zhan · Fang Zou · Fang Zou · Weisi Zhang · Yinghui Xiao · Yinghui Xiao
Behavioral Intention Analysis of Waste Separation in China - Case Study of Hangzhou Using Theory of Planned Behavior Shuangying Yu · Tiezhan Lu · Xuepeng Qian · Weisheng Zhou · Weisheng Zhou
Soft Power of Chinese Cities: Factors that Attract International Students to Study in Changchun City Xiaolong Zou · Xiling Zhu · Xiling Zhu
The Planning and Design of Residential Facilities in Poor Areas with Limited Land: A Case Study of Muharto Residential area along the Brantas River, Malang, Indonesia Pindo Tutuko · Edi Subagijo · Nurul Aini · Nurul Aini
Editorial introduction: Spatial planning system integration Wei Zuo · Wenyue Li · Wenyue Li
Mapping and Quantifying Variations in Ecosystem Services of Urban Green Spaces: A Test Case of Carbon Sequestration at the District Scale for Seoul, Korea (1975–2015) Yiwen Han · Wanmo Kang · Youngkeun Song · Youngkeun Song
Key factors of peoples willingness to pay for green buildings in a less developed region in China: A pilot research effort in Shanxi Province Xue Tian · Yan Li · Yan Li
Coordination through Integration: A critical review on the spatial policy and spatial planning system of France Jian Liu · Jian Liu
The Livability of Social Housing Communities in Taiwan: A Case Study of Taipei City Hui-Chun Tsuang · Kuang-Hui Peng · Kuang-Hui Peng
Regional Heritage Dimensions vs. Management Boundaries: A comparative framework of European and Asian countries Alba Victoria Zamarbide Urdaniz · Alba Victoria Zamarbide Urdaniz
Review on the Relationship between the Spatial Developments and the Change of Wooden Houses in Original Settlements in the Suburban Expansion of Bangkok Walanrak Poomchalit · Katsuhiko Suzuki · Arno Suzuki · Arno Suzuki
The Formation and Development of Shopping Areas in Chiang Mai, Thailand from the Foundation of Chiang Mai (1884) to 2000: the Transition of Shopping Streets to Complex Shopping Buildings Chompoonoot Chompoorath · Hiroaki Kimura · Hiroaki Kimura
From Concept to Action: Practice and Thinking in Urban Community Development and Community Planning in Chongqing Ling Huang · Yu-Ze Dan · Jian-Feng Xu · Miao Tong · Miao Tong
Planning Strategy for Green Transit Oriented Development Using A Multi-objecitve Planning Model Jen Hua Liu · Jen Te Pai · Jen Jia Lin · Jen Jia Lin
Community Renewal Strategy from the Perspective of Cultural Planning: A Case Study on Caohuajie Community in Chongqing Meng Zhou · Ling Huang · Zhenjiang Shen · Zhenjiang Shen
Activities and Roles Played by Architects in the Reconstruction of Hiroshima after its Atomic Bombing Ming Li · David Richard Neill · David Richard Neill
Are Garden Cities in the Desert Sustainable?: The Oasis City of Al Ain in the Emirate of Abu Dhabi Mohamed El Amrousi · Evan K. Paleologos · Paolo Caratelli · Mohamed Elhakeem · Mohamed Elhakeem
Triangle Law or Power Law?: City Size Distribution in Sub-national Levelled Administrative Areas in China Wenyue Li · Yue Zhang · Yue Zhang
Runoff Behavior on Urban Road Intersection based on Flow Profile Simulation Laksni Sedyowati · Turijan · Suhardjono · Ery Suhartanto · Mohammad Sholichin · Mohammad Sholichin
Willing to pay more for high-quality schools?: A hedonic pricing and propensity score matching approach Linchuan Yang · Bo Wang · Yunyi Zhang · Ziwei Ye · Yuzhuo Wang · Pengfei Li · Pengfei Li
An Integrated Land Use and Transport Model to Examine Polycentric Policies of Beijing Fang-Qu Niu · Wei-Dong Liu · Ming-Xing Chen · Ming-Xing Chen
Use of community spaces for sports and fitness – a case study of urban inhabitants in Shenzhen City, China Xiangyang Wu · Xinran Qin · Huixing Zhou · Huixing Zhou
Editorial introduction: Community Planning Yan Li · Yong-Hoon Son · Yong-Hoon Son
Review on Advanced Practice of Provincial Spatial Planning: Case of a Western, Less Developed Province Xin Lian · Xin Lian
The Role of Tourist Behaviour in The Determination of Tourist Attractions: Emerging tourist destinations in Jeju Island, South Korea through self-wedding photography Yelim Kim · Yong-Hoon Son · Yong-Hoon Son
A Study of Flood Disaster Risk Communication Model and Adaptive Behaviours for River-Watershed residents in Taiwan Di Hu · Jen-Te Pai · Yu-Yun Chen · Yu-Yun Chen
Local Identity Regeneration of Unused Urban Spaces Yuhan Shao · Binyi Liu · Binyi Liu
Global Creative Economy and Istanbul: A Focus on Film Industry Cluster Doğan Dursun · Doğan Dursun
Sustainable Strategy: Comprehensive Computational Approach for Wind Path Planning in Dense Urban Area Qingming Zhan · Yuli Fan · Yinghui Xiao · Wanlu Ouyang · Yuliang Lan · Zhicheng Jin · Jie Yin · Li Zhang · Li Zhang
The Role of CSR in the Revitalization of Urban Open Space for Better Sustainable Urban Development Tonny Suhartono · Tonny Suhartono
Site Selection for Public Health Centres (Puskesmas) Using Spatial Multicriteria Analysis in Purworejo Region Erika Yuliantari · Tria Anggita Hafsari · Ryanda Prima · Ryanda Prima
Exploring how to Lead the Transformation of Small and Medium-Sized Cities by Integration of Multi Planning:: Case Study of Jieshou City, Anhui Province, China Junzhe Wan · Yifan Li · Zongbo Tan · Zongbo Tan
Determine Non-Passenger Data from WiFi Scanner Data (MAC Address), A Case Study: Romango Bus, Obuse, Nagano Prefecture, Japan Arief Hidayat · Shintaro Terabe · Hideki Yaginuma · Hideki Yaginuma
The Role of GeMaSPeKoLa in Supporting The Preservation of Semarang Old Town Suzanna Ratih Sari · Arnis Rochma Harani · Santosa Adi Wibowo · Santosa Adi Wibowo
Co-exist or Integrate?: Reviewing the Spatial Planning Reform of China from the Perspective of Central-Local Relations Tianxin Hu · Jing Zhou · Jing Zhou
Open spaces: spatial configuration, visibility analysis and use: Case study of mass housing in Biskra, Algeria Souhaila Bendjedidi · Yassine Bada · Rim Meziani · Rim Meziani
Assessment of Inclusive Historical Public Spaces in achieving preservation of such areas in Malang, Indonesia: Case study: Public spaces developed during the Dutch Colonial period A.Tutut Subadyo · Pindo Tutuko · Septi Dwi Cahyani · Septi Dwi Cahyani
Editorial Introduction: Urban-Rural Regeneration and Cultural Sustainability Pindo Tutuko · Yong-Hoon Son · Yong-Hoon Son
Key factors on migration assuming disaster risk of a megathrust earthquake:: A case study in the Pacific coastal area of Japan Ryohei Yamashita · Ryohei Yamashita
Editorial introduction: Special issue on Environment Management and Spatial Planning Guangwei Huang · Zhenjiang Shen · Zhenjiang Shen
Application of Public Private Partnerships on Urban River Management in China: A Case Study of Chu River Xiaoxi Guo · Xiaoxi Guo
3D Insolation Colour Rendering for Photovoltaic Potential: Evaluation on Equatorial Residential Building Envelope Puteri Fitriaty · Zhenjiang Shen · Kenichi Sugihara · Fumihiko Kobayashi · Tatsuya Nishino · Tatsuya Nishino
Review of Urban Flood Impact Reduction due to Climate Change Adaption Driven by Urban Planning Management in Pathumthani Province, Thailand Yaowalak Chanthamas · Sutee Anantasuksomsri · Nij Tontisirin · Nij Tontisirin
Different methods for the evaluation of surface water quality: The Case of the Liao River, Liaoning Province, China Lei Zhang · Lei Zhang
Study on Agricultural Management for Sustainable Agriculture in Zhangye Oasis, Middle Reaches of Heihe River Basin: A case study in Linze County Manru Zhou · Atsushi Ozaki · Kazuki Kobayashi · Takuma Kozono · Makoto Kanasugi · Makoto Kanasugi
Thermal Environment Simulation of an East-West Street in Taipei Chen-Yi Sun · Chen-Yi Sun
Special issue on urbanization in the Gulf Meziani Rim · Tei Pai Jen · Tei Pai Jen
Building Resilient Cities through Community Empowerment: Principles and Strategies for Taiwan Yung-Jaan Lee · Yung-Jaan Lee
Automatic Generation of 3D Building Models with Efficient Solar Photovoltaic Generation Sugihara Kenichi · Shen Zhenjiang · Shen Zhenjiang
Construction of Urban Design Support System using Cloud Computing Type Virtual Reality and Case Study Lei Zhenhan · Shimizu Shunta · Ota Natuska · Ito Yuji · Zhang Yuesong · Zhang Yuesong
Qualitative Study on Urban Morphology and Social Problems in Multi-Story Housing Projects: Ajman City as a Case Study Emad Mushtaha · Emad Mushtaha
Urban Growth Boundaries of the Hangzhou Metropolitan Area Based on Ecosystem Service Han Haoying · Ma Qiwei · Li Yonghua · Li Yonghua
Editorial introduction / Overview: Special Issues on the horizontal of research and methodologies on Sustainability in Asia Son Yong-hoon · Gao Xiaolu · You Ninglong · You Ninglong
Negative Perceptions of Urban Tourism Community in Beijing: Based on Online Comments Li Ping · Wang Kaiyong · Chen Tian · Wang Fuyuan · Wang Fuyuan
The Evolving Role of Modern Urbanistic Heritage in Shaping Sustainable Public Realm:The Case of Abu Dhabi Husnéin Adnan · Husnéin Adnan
Editorial introduction: Special issue on urbanization in the Gulf Rim Meziani · Jen Tei Pai · Jen Tei Pai
Big data for intrametropolitan human movement studies: A case study of bus commuters based on smart card data Jiangping Zhou · Mingshu Wang · Ying Long · Ying Long
Exploring the Politico-Cultural Dimensions for Development of Smart Cities in India Dillip Kumar Das · Dillip Kumar Das
A Study on the Space Layout and Configuration of Shopping Malls in Relation to Pedestrian Movement Behavior - Case of UAE Rim Meziani · Hussien Ali Hussien · Hussien Ali Hussien
A Self-Adjusting Approach to Identify Hotspots Haoying Han · Xianfan Shu · Xianfan Shu
Local Spatial Impacts of Globalization in Developing Countries: The Case of Sohar, Oman Talal Al-Awadhi · Talal Al-Awadhi
The Expansion of Densely Inhabited Districts in a Megacity - Case of Tokyo Seth Mberego · Yan Li · Yan Li
An Integrated Model of Transportation and Land Use for Development and Application in Beijing Zhang Yu · Zhang Xiaodong · Zheng Meng · Long Ying · Long Ying
Assessment of the Process for Designing an Apartment Building through IM & VR Imaizumi Jun · Imaizumi Jun
Editorial Introduction: Special Issue onBIM and VR Technology Zhang Yuanyi · Pai Jente · Pai Jente
Analysis of the population displacement phenomenon under tourism economy development in Chinese historical areas: Based on Social Exchange Theory Zhang Ruoxi · Zhang Yunyi · Liu Xuting · Yin Qiuyi · Yang Lvxia · Yang Lvxia
Green-energy, water-autonomous greenhouse system: an alternative-technology approach towards sustainable smart-green vertical greening in smart cities Hung Paiyao · Peng Kuanghui · Peng Kuanghui
Interaction and Integration of Cultural Inheritance, Ecotourism, and Industrial Development.: Strategies, Mechanisms and Spatial Practice of The Amis Dietary Culture Transformed into Creativity Living Industry Yi-Su Chen · Li-Wei Liu · Li-Wei Liu
Cellular automata for urban growth modelling: a review on factors defining transition rules Agung Wahyudi · Yan Liu · Yan Liu
オープンイノベーションの規範:深せん市(中国)における外部調達からオープンソース化へ Fernandez Valerie · Puel Gilles · Renaud Clement · Renaud Clement
Review on Urban GHG Inventory in China Fan Yang · Yan Li · Jiangang Xu · Jiangang Xu
Disaster Management in Coastal Tourism Destinations: The Case for Transactive Planning and Social Learning David Nguyen · Fumihiko Imamura · Kanako Iuchi · Kanako Iuchi
Empowering The Local Community Via Biomass Utilization: A Case Study In Thailand Thanapan Tantiwatthanaphanich · Xiaolong Zou · Xiaolong Zou
A Registration System for Preventing/Mitigating Urban Flood Disasters as One Way to Smartly Adapt to Climate Change in Japanese Cities Sampei Yamashita · Sadanori Matsuda · Ryoichi Watanabe · Yukihiro Shimatani · Toshiyuki Moriyama · Hironori Hayashi · Hiroki Iyooka · Teruki Hamada · Terukazu Yamashita · Kumiko Kakudo · Tomoko Minagawa · Tomoko Minagawa
Regeneration of Historic Area with Social Orientation::Investigation and Analysis of Three Historic Areas in Beijing Yang Shi · Lanchun Bian · Lanchun Bian
Integrated Neighbourhood Network on A Case Study of Condominium Community: Nimmanhaemin District, Chiang Mai Thailand Kitika Chiranthanin · Katsuhiko Suzuki · Katsuhiko Suzuki
Special Issue onEnvironmental Planning Li Yan · Pai Jen Te · Pai Jen Te
Empirical Analysis of the Digital Divide from the Perspective of Internet Usage Patterns: A Case Study of Nanjing Enyu Chang · Feng Zhen · Yang Cao · Yang Cao
Research on Smart Community Planning of Yishanwan, China towards New Urbanization Dang Anrong · Gongli Li · Juan Li · Xianjuan Kong · Xianjuan Kong
Protection and regeneration of traditional buildings based on BIM:A case study of Qing Dynasty tea house in Guifeng Village Bai Suling · Ying Zhang · Claudia Stancanelli · Claudia Stancanelli
Study of Performance Assessment for Urban Renewal Project in Taipei City Kuan-Hua Huang · Jen-Te Pai · Jen-Hua Liu · Jen-Hua Liu
Analysis of spatial and temporal patterns of daily activities of suburban residents based on GPS data: A case study of the Shangdi-Qinghe area of Beijing Xue Zhang · Yanwei Chai · Zifeng Chen · Yiming Tan · Yiming Tan
A Comparative Study on the Present Government Procurement Act and Act for Promotion of Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects in Taiwan Po-Wen Huang · Po-Wen Huang
Detecting Urban Dynamics with Taxi Trip Data for Evaluation and Optimizing of Spatial Planning:: The Example of Xiamen City, China Longzhu Xiao · Wangtu Xu · Jixiang Liu · Jixiang Liu
Highway Transportation Efficiency Evaluation for Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region Based on Advanced DEA Model Zhihong Li · Zhihong Li · Li Zhao · Zhenzhou Yuan · Zhenzhou Yuan
Special Issue onSustainable Residential Areas Taylor Tracey · Shen Zhenjiang · Shen Zhenjiang
Status and Problems in Location Model Research for Guidance Signage in Comprehensive Passenger Transportation Hubs Jianxin Lin · Jianxin Lin · Jifeng Dai · Rui Song · Rui Song
Analyzing the Effectiveness of Policy Instruments on New Energy Vehicle Industry using Consistent Fuzzy Preference Relations A case study in China Dan Li · Hongwei Guo · Xianzhi Wang · Ze Liu · Cheng Li · Wuhong Wang · Wuhong Wang
Attending Nearby Schools in Central Beijing: Influencing Factors and the Policy Distortion Bo Bi · Xiaoling Zhang · Xiaoling Zhang
Special Issue onUrban and Regional Sustainability in China Zhen Feng · Pai Jen Te · Pai Jen Te
Special Issue onInfrastructure and Transportation Planning Xu Wangtu(Ato) · te Pai Jen · te Pai Jen
Community development in urban Guangzhou since 1980: a social sustainability perspective Zongcai Wei · Zongcai Wei · Bo Wang · Tingting Chen · Yunqi Lin · Yunqi Lin
Greenhouse Gas Inventory Accounting for Chinese Cities: A Preliminary Study Zhao Ruixi · Li Yan · Li Yan
Travel Experiences and Aspirations: A Case Study from Chinese Youth Feifei Xu · Lorraine Brown · Philip Long · Philip Long
Measuring Urban Space of Flows in Information Era: Empirical Evidence from Nanjing, China Xi Guangliang · Zhen Feng · Chang Enyu · Chang Enyu
Editorial introduction : Special Issue onUrban and Regional Sustainability in China Feng Zhen · Jen Te Pai · 白仁德 · 白仁德
The Open Innovation Paradigm: from Outsourcing to Open-sourcing in Shenzhen, China Gilles Puel · Clément Renaud · Clément Renaud