Last updated on

IFAC-PapersOnLine
Latest Impact Factor IF - Analysis · Trend · Prediction · Ranking


User Feedback

Journal Impact IF

2021-2022

1.132

-4.2 %

Journal Impact IF Trend

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Popular Journals

Highly Cited Articles

IFAC-PapersOnLine

High Impact Research Articles
Publication Title Author Listing
Publication Title Author Listing
· ·
· · · · ·
· · ·
·
· ·
·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· ·
· · · ·
·
·
· · · · ·
·
· ·
· · ·
·
· · · · · · · ·
· ·
· · · · ·
· ·
·
· ·
· · · · · ·
· ·
· ·
· · ·
· · ·
· · · ·
· ·
· ·
·
· ·
· ·
·
· · ·
· · · ·
· · ·
· ·
· · ·
· · ·
· · · ·
· ·
·
· ·
· ·
· ·

Highly Cited Keywords

IFAC-PapersOnLine

High Impact Research Keywords

Journal Impact IF Ranking

IFAC-PapersOnLine

Journal Impact IF Ranking
Subcategory Quartile Rank Percentile
Control and Systems Engineering Q3 148/260

Control and Systems Engineering 43%

Journal Impact IF Ranking

· In the Control and Systems Engineering research field, the Quartile of IFAC-PapersOnLine is Q3. IFAC-PapersOnLine has been ranked #148 over 260 related journals in the Control and Systems Engineering research category. The ranking percentile of IFAC-PapersOnLine is around 43% in the field of Control and Systems Engineering.

Related Journals

IFAC-PapersOnLine

Similar Journals

IFAC-PapersOnLine

The 2021-2022 Journal Impact IF of IFAC-PapersOnLine is 1.132, which is just updated in 2022.

IFAC-PapersOnLine Impact Factor
Highest IF
1.182
Highest Journal Impact IF

The highest Journal Impact IF of IFAC-PapersOnLine is 1.182.

Lowest IF
0.308
Lowest Journal Impact IF

The lowest Journal Impact IF of IFAC-PapersOnLine is 0.308.

Total Growth Rate
267.5%
IF Total Growth Rate

The total growth rate of IFAC-PapersOnLine IF is 267.5%.

Annual Growth Rate
26.8%
IF Annual Growth Rate

The annual growth rate of IFAC-PapersOnLine IF is 26.8%.

Journal Impact IF History

IFAC-PapersOnLine

Journal Impact IF Trend

Year Journal Impact IF
Year Journal Impact IF
2022-2023 Check our Real-Time Impact Factor and Impact Factor Prediction Results
2020-2021 1.132
2019-2020 1.182
2018-2019 1.064
2017-2018 0.824
2016-2017 0.626
2015-2016 0.498
2014-2015 0.427
2013-2014 0.651
2012-2013 0.44
2011-2012 0.308
Journal Impact IF History

· The 2020-2021 Journal Impact IF of IFAC-PapersOnLine is 1.132
· The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of IFAC-PapersOnLine is 1.182
· The 2018-2019 Journal Impact IF of IFAC-PapersOnLine is 1.064
· The 2017-2018 Journal Impact IF of IFAC-PapersOnLine is 0.824
· The 2016-2017 Journal Impact IF of IFAC-PapersOnLine is 0.626
· The 2015-2016 Journal Impact IF of IFAC-PapersOnLine is 0.498
· The 2014-2015 Journal Impact IF of IFAC-PapersOnLine is 0.427
· The 2013-2014 Journal Impact IF of IFAC-PapersOnLine is 0.651
· The 2012-2013 Journal Impact IF of IFAC-PapersOnLine is 0.44
· The 2011-2012 Journal Impact IF of IFAC-PapersOnLine is 0.308

IFAC-PapersOnLine

Journal Key Metrics
Journal Title IFAC-PapersOnLine
ISSN 2405-8963
ISSN (Online) -
Publisher
IFAC Secretariat
Publication Frequency
-
Coverage
2002-2019
Open Access
NO
Language
English
Highest Impact Factor (2011 - 2022) 1.182
Lowest Impact Factor (2011 - 2022) 0.308
Total Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2011 - 2022) 267.5%
Avarage Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2011 - 2022) 26.8%
Annual Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2021 - 2022) -4.2 %
Publication Fees
Homepage
Submit Manuscript

IFAC-PapersOnLine

Impact Factor 2022-2023 Prediction
IFAC-PapersOnLine Impact Factor Predition System

IFAC-PapersOnLine Impact Factor Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community.

Predict Check All Preditions

What is Impact Factor?

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly average number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factor values are often deemed to be more important, or carry more intrinsic prestige in their respective fields, than those with lower values.

IFAC-PapersOnLine | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones. According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.” Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. The Impact Factor of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. It is frequently used as a Metric for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher Impact Factor are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The IFAC-PapersOnLine Impact Factor IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2021) by papers published in the IFAC-PapersOnLine during the two preceding years (2019-2020). Note that 2021 Impact Factor are reported in 2022; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2021 publications have been processed by the indexing agency. New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1, are known zero values. Journals that are indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have been indexed for three years. Occasionally, Journal Citation Reports assigns an impact factor to new journals with less than two years of indexing, based on partial citation data. The calculation always uses two complete and known years of item counts, but for new titles one of the known counts is zero. Annuals and other irregular publications sometimes publish no items in a particular year, affecting the count. The impact factor relates to a specific time period; it is possible to calculate it for any desired period. In addition to the 2-year Impact Factor, the 3-year Impact Factor, 4-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Real-Time Impact Factor can provide further insights and factors into the impact of IFAC-PapersOnLine.

History

The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Impact factors are calculated yearly starting from 1975 for journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). ISI was acquired by Thomson Scientific & Healthcare in 1992, and became known as Thomson ISI. In 2018, Thomson ISI was sold to Onex Corporation and Baring Private Equity Asia. They founded a new corporation, Clarivate, which is now the publisher of the JCR.

Use

The impact factor is used to compare different journals within a certain field. The Web of Science indexes more than 11,500 science and social science journals. Journal impact factors are often used to evaluate the merit of individual articles and individual researchers. This use of impact factors was summarised by Hoeffel:

Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation. Experience has shown that in each specialty the best journals are those in which it is most difficult to have an article accepted, and these are the journals that have a high impact factor. Most of these journals existed long before the impact factor was devised. The use of impact factor as a measure of quality is widespread because it fits well with the opinion we have in each field of the best journals in our specialty....In conclusion, prestigious journals publish papers of high level. Therefore, their impact factor is high, and not the contrary.

Eugene Garfield

In brief, Impact factors may be used by:
  • Authors to decide where to submit an article for publication.
  • Libraries to make collection development decisions
  • Academic departments to assess academic productivity
  • Academic departments to make decisions on promotion and tenure.
As impact factors are a journal-level metric, rather than an article- or individual-level metric, this use is controversial. Garfield agrees with Hoeffel,but warns about the "misuse in evaluating individuals" because there is "a wide variation [of citations] from article to article within a single journal". Other things to consider about Impact Factors:
  • Many journals do not have an impact factor.
  • The impact factor cannot assess the quality of individual articles. Even if citations were evenly distributed among articles, the impact factor would only measure the interests of other researchers in an article, not its importance and usefulness.
  • Only research articles, technical notes and reviews are “citable” items. Editorials, letters, news items and meeting abstracts are “non-citable items”.
  • Only a small percentage of articles are highly cited and they are found in a small subset of journals. This small proportion accounts for a large percentage of citations.
  • Controversial papers, such as those based on fraudulent data, may be highly cited, distorting the impact factor of a journal.
  • Citation bias may exist. For example, English language resources may be favoured. Authors may cite their own work.
Moreover, informed and careful use of these impact data is essential, and should be based on a thorough understanding of the methodology used to generate impact factors. There are controversial aspects of using impact factors:
  • It is not clear whether the number of times a paper is cited measures its actual quality.
  • Some databases that calculate impact factors fail to incorporate publications including textbooks, handbooks and reference books.
  • Certain disciplines have low numbers of journals and usage. Therefore, one should only compare journals or researchers within the same discipline.
  • Review articles normally are cited more often and therefore can skew results.
  • Self-citing may also skew results.
  • Some resources used to calculate impact factors have inadequate international coverage.
  • Editorial policies can artificially inflate an impact factor.
Impact factors have often been used in advancement and tenure decision-making. Many recognize that this is a coarse tool for such important decisions, and that a multitude of factors should be taken into account in these deliberations. When considering the use of the impact factor (IF), keep these aspects in mind:
  • IF analysis is limited to citations from the journals indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge. Currently, the Web of Science indexes only 8621 journals across the full breadth of the sciences, and just 3121 in the social sciences.
  • A high IF/citation rate says nothing about the quality -- or even, validity -- of the references being cited. Notorious or even retracted articles often attract a lot of attention, hence a high number of citations. The notority related to the first publication on "cold fusion" is one such example.
  • Journals that publish more "review articles" are often found near the top of the rankings. While not known for publishing new, creative findings, these individual articles tend to be heavily cited.
  • The IF measures the average number of citations to articles in the journal -- given this, a small number of highly-cited articles will skew the figure.
  • It takes several years for new journals to be added to the list of titles indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge, so these newer titles will be under-represented.
  • It's alleged that journal editors have learned to "game" the system, encouraging authors to cite their works previously published in the same journal.
Comparing Journals Across Disciplines? Not a good idea! Using Impact Factors within a given discipline should only be done with great care, as described above. Using impact factor data to compare journals across disciplines is even more problematic. Here are some of the reasons:
  • Disciplines where older literature is still referenced, such as Chemistry and Mathematics, offer challenges to the methodolgy since older citations (older than two years) are not used to calculate the impact factor for a given journal. (Five-year impact factor analysis, which can be calculated using the Journal Citation Index database, helps smooth out this problem only to some degree.)
  • Different disciplines have different practices regarding tendency to cite larger numbers of references. Higher overall citation rates will bump upward impact factor measurements.
  • Where it's common for large numbers of authors to collaborate on a single paper, such as in Physics, the tendency of authors to cite themselves (and in this case, more authors) will result in increased citation rates.

Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor

Pros:

  • A vetted, established metric for measuring journal impact within a discipline.
  • Designed to eliminate bias based on journal size and frequency.
Cons:
  • Individual articles makes an uneven contribution to overall Impact Factor.
  • Impact Factor does not account for certain things, things like context (postive or negative citaion) and intentionality (self-citation).
  • The metric is proprietary to and bound by the contents of the Thomson Reuters database.
  • Citations, on which the Impact Factor is based, count for less than 1% of an article's overall use.

Criticism

Numerous critiques have been made regarding the use of impact factors. A 2007 study noted that the most fundamental flaw is that impact factors present the mean of data that are not normally distributed, and suggested that it would be more appropriate to present the median of these data. There is also a more general debate on the validity of the impact factor as a measure of journal importance and the effect of policies that editors may adopt to boost their impact factor (perhaps to the detriment of readers and writers). Other criticism focuses on the effect of the impact factor on behavior of scholars, editors and other stakeholders. Others have made more general criticisms, arguing that emphasis on impact factor results from negative influence of neoliberal policies on academia claiming that what is needed is not just replacement of the impact factor with more sophisticated metrics for science publications but also discussion on the social value of research assessment and the growing precariousness of scientific careers in higher education.
Experts stress that there are limitations in using impact factors to evaluate a scholar's work. There are many reasons cited for not relying on impact factor alone to evaluate the output of a particular individual. Among these are the following:

  • A single factor is not sufficient for evaluating an author's work.
  • Journal values are meaningless unless compared within the same discipline. Impact factors vary among disciplines.
  • The impact factor was originally devised to show the impact of a specific journal, not a specific scholar. The quality and impact of the author's work may extend beyond the impact of a particular journal.
According to Jim Testa, a researcher for ThomsonReuters Scientific, the most widespread misuse of the Impact Factor is to evaluate the work of an individual author (instead of a journal). "To say that because a researcher is publishing in a certain journal, he or she is more influential or deserves more credit is not necessarily true. There are many other variables to consider." (interview 6/26/2008 in Thomson Reuters blog entry)

IFAC-PapersOnLine
Journal Profile

About

All papers from IFAC meetings are published, in partnership with Elsevier, the IFAC Publisher, in theIFAC-PapersOnLine proceedings series hosted at the ScienceDirect web service. This series includes papers previously published in the IFAC website.The main features of the IFAC-PapersOnLine series are: -Online archive including papers from IFAC Symposia, Congresses, Conferences, and most Workshops. -All papers accepted at the meeting are published in PDF format - searchable and citable. -All papers published on the web site can be cited using the IFAC PapersOnLine ISSN and the individual paper DOI (Digital Object Identifier). The site is Open Access in nature - no charge is made to individuals for reading or downloading. Copyright of all papers belongs to IFAC and must be referenced if derivative journal papers are produced from the conference papers. All papers published in IFAC-PapersOnLine have undergone a peer review selection process according to the IFAC rules. All papers from IFAC meetings are published, in partnership with Elsevier, the IFAC Publisher, in theIFAC-PapersOnLine proceedings series hosted at the ScienceDirect web service. This series includes papers previously published in the IFAC websiteThe main features of the IFAC-PapersOnLine series are:

ISSN
2405-8963
ISSN

The ISSN of IFAC-PapersOnLine is 2405-8963 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

ISSN (Online)
-
ISSN (Online)

The ISSN (Online) of IFAC-PapersOnLine is - . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

Publisher
IFAC Secretariat
Publisher

IFAC-PapersOnLine is published by IFAC Secretariat .

Publication Frequency
-
Publication Frequency

IFAC-PapersOnLine publishes reports - .

Coverage
2002-2019
Coverage

The Publication History of IFAC-PapersOnLine covers 2002-2019 .

Open Access
NO
Open Access

Publication Fees
Publication Fees

Language
English
Language

The language of IFAC-PapersOnLine is English .

Country/Region
Austria
Country/Region

The publisher of IFAC-PapersOnLine is IFAC Secretariat , which locates in Austria .

International Collaboration Trend

IFAC-PapersOnLine

Cited Documents Trend

IFAC-PapersOnLine

Total Publications
13890
Total Citations
42726

Annual Publication Volume

IFAC-PapersOnLine

Annual Citation Record

IFAC-PapersOnLine

Publications Cites Dataset

IFAC-PapersOnLine

Year Publications Citations
Year Publications Citations
2005 0 1
2006 0 1
2007 0 3
2009 0 1
2010 0 2
2011 0 4
2012 1 4
2013 0 11
2014 0 16
2015 2855 453
2016 2511 2610
2017 2656 4985
2018 3321 7792
2019 2359 11409
2020 185 13922
2021 1 1512
Publications Cites Dataset

· The IFAC-PapersOnLine has published 0 reports and received 1 citations in 2005.
· The IFAC-PapersOnLine has published 0 reports and received 1 citations in 2006.
· The IFAC-PapersOnLine has published 0 reports and received 3 citations in 2007.
· The IFAC-PapersOnLine has published 0 reports and received 1 citations in 2009.
· The IFAC-PapersOnLine has published 0 reports and received 2 citations in 2010.
· The IFAC-PapersOnLine has published 0 reports and received 4 citations in 2011.
· The IFAC-PapersOnLine has published 1 reports and received 4 citations in 2012.
· The IFAC-PapersOnLine has published 0 reports and received 11 citations in 2013.
· The IFAC-PapersOnLine has published 0 reports and received 16 citations in 2014.
· The IFAC-PapersOnLine has published 2855 reports and received 453 citations in 2015.
· The IFAC-PapersOnLine has published 2511 reports and received 2610 citations in 2016.
· The IFAC-PapersOnLine has published 2656 reports and received 4985 citations in 2017.
· The IFAC-PapersOnLine has published 3321 reports and received 7792 citations in 2018.
· The IFAC-PapersOnLine has published 2359 reports and received 11409 citations in 2019.
· The IFAC-PapersOnLine has published 185 reports and received 13922 citations in 2020.
· The IFAC-PapersOnLine has published 1 reports and received 1512 citations in 2021.
· The total publications of IFAC-PapersOnLine is 13890.
· The total citations of IFAC-PapersOnLine is 42726.

Share Your Impact Factor Information with Community

Do you know the Latest Impact Factor of IFAC-PapersOnLine? Share with the community!

Impact Factor

What is the Latest Impact Factor?

Data Source

Where do you get the information?



Impact Factor Data Source
Impact Factor Data Source
0.308 Bing

Thanks for sharing your information with us!

IFAC-PapersOnLine - DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.09.118
Minimal Controllable Set for Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Systems with disturbances

Carlos Ariño · Antonio Sala ·

Mathematics
PDF

IFAC-PapersOnLine - DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.09.118
Minimal Controllable Set for Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Systems with disturbances

Carlos Ariño · Antonio Sala ·

Mathematics
PDF

IFAC-PapersOnLine - DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.09.118
Minimal Controllable Set for Takagi-Sugeno Fuzzy Systems with disturbances

Carlos Ariño · Antonio Sala ·

Mathematics
PDF

Objectives The National Cancer Control Programme (NCCP) began developing national evidence based clinical guidelines in 2012.

43 Generating guideline recommendations – exploring patient values? [10.1136/bmjebm-2019-EBMLive.51]


Conventional PID has poor control effect on the large delay object of drum water level in thermal power plant, and it is difficult to achieve satisfactory control effect.

Research and Application of Drum Water Level Control in Power Plant Based on Fuzzy Control [10.1109/IMCEC46724.2019.8983910]


The goal was to accommodate all sensor types for monitoring and control and to develop a generic multisensor excitation low voltage chassis that would be used across both magnet systems with a reduced set of functions.

Development of FPGA-based multi-sensor excitation low voltage (MSELV) chassis at Jefferson Lab. [10.1063/1.5127460]


Thus the value is to offer a systems view on the leadership function of team monitoring with regards to team emergent states, which we term team state monitoring.

Beyond Separate Emergence: A Systems View of Team Learning Climate [10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01441]


Participants randomized to the sham control arm were allowed to cross to RF ablation at 12 months.

Intraosseous Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain: 2-Year Results From a Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Sham-Controlled Multicenter Study [10.14444/6015]


The subsystems which actuate the control surfaces are very complex, composed of hundreds of components working together.

Generating potential actuation architectures for multifunctional flight control surfaces using a Design Structure Matrix clustering algorithm [10.1007/S13272-018-0332-1]

Scientific Writng Keywords