Harvard Review of Psychiatry
Journal Impact IF - Analysis · Trend · Prediction · Ranking


New

Journal Impact IF

2019-2020

3.072

22.5%

Journal Impact IF Trend

Related Journals

Popular Journals

Harvard Review of Psychiatry

The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of Harvard Review of Psychiatry is 3.072, which is just updated in 2020.

Harvard Review of Psychiatry Impact Factor
Highest IF
3.5
Highest Journal Impact IF

The highest Journal Impact IF of Harvard Review of Psychiatry is 3.5.

Lowest IF
1.727
Lowest Journal Impact IF

The lowest Journal Impact IF of Harvard Review of Psychiatry is 1.727.

Total Growth Rate
0.9%
IF Total Growth Rate

The total growth rate of Harvard Review of Psychiatry IF is 0.9%.

Annual Growth Rate
0.1%
IF Annual Growth Rate

The annual growth rate of Harvard Review of Psychiatry IF is 0.1%.

Journal Impact IF Ranking

Subcategory Quartile Rank Percentile
Psychiatry and Mental Health Q1 86/506

Psychiatry and Mental Health 83%

Journal Impact IF Ranking

· In the Psychiatry and Mental Health research field, the Quartile of Harvard Review of Psychiatry is Q1. Harvard Review of Psychiatry has been ranked #86 over 506 related journals in the Psychiatry and Mental Health research category. The ranking percentile of Harvard Review of Psychiatry is around 83% in the field of Psychiatry and Mental Health.

Harvard Review of Psychiatry Impact Factor 2020-2021 Prediction

Harvard Review of Psychiatry Impact Factor Predition System

Harvard Review of Psychiatry Impact Factor Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community.

Predict Check All Preditions
Total Publications
1051
Total Citations
47032

Annual Publication Volume

Annual Citation Record

International Collaboration Trend

Cited Documents Trend

Journal Impact IF History

Year Journal Impact IF
Year Journal Impact IF
2019-2020 3.072
2018-2019 2.507
2017-2018 3.264
2016-2017 2.986
2015-2016 2.328
2014-2015 1.727
2013-2014 2.491
2012-2013 3.5
2011-2012 3.046
Journal Impact IF History

· The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of Harvard Review of Psychiatry is 3.072
· The 2018-2019 Journal Impact IF of Harvard Review of Psychiatry is 2.507
· The 2017-2018 Journal Impact IF of Harvard Review of Psychiatry is 3.264
· The 2016-2017 Journal Impact IF of Harvard Review of Psychiatry is 2.986
· The 2015-2016 Journal Impact IF of Harvard Review of Psychiatry is 2.328
· The 2014-2015 Journal Impact IF of Harvard Review of Psychiatry is 1.727
· The 2013-2014 Journal Impact IF of Harvard Review of Psychiatry is 2.491
· The 2012-2013 Journal Impact IF of Harvard Review of Psychiatry is 3.5
· The 2011-2012 Journal Impact IF of Harvard Review of Psychiatry is 3.046

Publications Cites Dataset

Year Publications Citations
Year Publications Citations
1993 37 0
1994 53 44
1995 47 135
1996 46 257
1997 41 273
1998 43 319
1999 43 486
2000 48 649
2001 36 742
2002 38 929
2003 36 1191
2004 36 1178
2005 28 1347
2006 31 1561
2007 29 1742
2008 36 1902
2009 34 1969
2010 33 2064
2011 31 2439
2012 32 2888
2013 29 3039
2014 40 3081
2015 39 3142
2016 36 2886
2017 37 2768
2018 32 2557
2019 35 3026
2020 38 4019
2021 7 399
Publications Cites Dataset

· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 37 reports and received 0 citations in 1993.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 53 reports and received 44 citations in 1994.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 47 reports and received 135 citations in 1995.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 46 reports and received 257 citations in 1996.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 41 reports and received 273 citations in 1997.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 43 reports and received 319 citations in 1998.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 43 reports and received 486 citations in 1999.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 48 reports and received 649 citations in 2000.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 36 reports and received 742 citations in 2001.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 38 reports and received 929 citations in 2002.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 36 reports and received 1191 citations in 2003.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 36 reports and received 1178 citations in 2004.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 28 reports and received 1347 citations in 2005.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 31 reports and received 1561 citations in 2006.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 29 reports and received 1742 citations in 2007.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 36 reports and received 1902 citations in 2008.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 34 reports and received 1969 citations in 2009.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 33 reports and received 2064 citations in 2010.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 31 reports and received 2439 citations in 2011.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 32 reports and received 2888 citations in 2012.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 29 reports and received 3039 citations in 2013.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 40 reports and received 3081 citations in 2014.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 39 reports and received 3142 citations in 2015.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 36 reports and received 2886 citations in 2016.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 37 reports and received 2768 citations in 2017.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 32 reports and received 2557 citations in 2018.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 35 reports and received 3026 citations in 2019.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 38 reports and received 4019 citations in 2020.
· The Harvard Review of Psychiatry has published 7 reports and received 399 citations in 2021.
· The total publications of Harvard Review of Psychiatry is 1051.
· The total citations of Harvard Review of Psychiatry is 47032.

What is Impact Factor?

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly average number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factor values are often deemed to be more important, or carry more intrinsic prestige in their respective fields, than those with lower values.

Harvard Review of Psychiatry | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones. According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.” Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. The Impact Factor of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. It is frequently used as a Metric for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher Impact Factor are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The Harvard Review of Psychiatry Impact Factor IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2020) by papers published in the Harvard Review of Psychiatry during the two preceding years (2018-2019). Note that 2020 Impact Factor are reported in 2021; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2020 publications have been processed by the indexing agency. New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1, are known zero values. Journals that are indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have been indexed for three years. Occasionally, Journal Citation Reports assigns an impact factor to new journals with less than two years of indexing, based on partial citation data. The calculation always uses two complete and known years of item counts, but for new titles one of the known counts is zero. Annuals and other irregular publications sometimes publish no items in a particular year, affecting the count. The impact factor relates to a specific time period; it is possible to calculate it for any desired period. In addition to the 2-year Impact Factor, the 3-year Impact Factor, 4-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Real-Time Impact Factor can provide further insights and factors into the impact of Harvard Review of Psychiatry.

History

The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Impact factors are calculated yearly starting from 1975 for journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). ISI was acquired by Thomson Scientific & Healthcare in 1992, and became known as Thomson ISI. In 2018, Thomson ISI was sold to Onex Corporation and Baring Private Equity Asia. They founded a new corporation, Clarivate, which is now the publisher of the JCR.

Use

The impact factor is used to compare different journals within a certain field. The Web of Science indexes more than 11,500 science and social science journals. Journal impact factors are often used to evaluate the merit of individual articles and individual researchers. This use of impact factors was summarised by Hoeffel:

Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation. Experience has shown that in each specialty the best journals are those in which it is most difficult to have an article accepted, and these are the journals that have a high impact factor. Most of these journals existed long before the impact factor was devised. The use of impact factor as a measure of quality is widespread because it fits well with the opinion we have in each field of the best journals in our specialty....In conclusion, prestigious journals publish papers of high level. Therefore, their impact factor is high, and not the contrary.

Eugene Garfield

In brief, Impact factors may be used by:
  • Authors to decide where to submit an article for publication.
  • Libraries to make collection development decisions
  • Academic departments to assess academic productivity
  • Academic departments to make decisions on promotion and tenure.
As impact factors are a journal-level metric, rather than an article- or individual-level metric, this use is controversial. Garfield agrees with Hoeffel,but warns about the "misuse in evaluating individuals" because there is "a wide variation [of citations] from article to article within a single journal". Other things to consider about Impact Factors:
  • Many journals do not have an impact factor.
  • The impact factor cannot assess the quality of individual articles. Even if citations were evenly distributed among articles, the impact factor would only measure the interests of other researchers in an article, not its importance and usefulness.
  • Only research articles, technical notes and reviews are “citable” items. Editorials, letters, news items and meeting abstracts are “non-citable items”.
  • Only a small percentage of articles are highly cited and they are found in a small subset of journals. This small proportion accounts for a large percentage of citations.
  • Controversial papers, such as those based on fraudulent data, may be highly cited, distorting the impact factor of a journal.
  • Citation bias may exist. For example, English language resources may be favoured. Authors may cite their own work.
Moreover, informed and careful use of these impact data is essential, and should be based on a thorough understanding of the methodology used to generate impact factors. There are controversial aspects of using impact factors:
  • It is not clear whether the number of times a paper is cited measures its actual quality.
  • Some databases that calculate impact factors fail to incorporate publications including textbooks, handbooks and reference books.
  • Certain disciplines have low numbers of journals and usage. Therefore, one should only compare journals or researchers within the same discipline.
  • Review articles normally are cited more often and therefore can skew results.
  • Self-citing may also skew results.
  • Some resources used to calculate impact factors have inadequate international coverage.
  • Editorial policies can artificially inflate an impact factor.
Impact factors have often been used in advancement and tenure decision-making. Many recognize that this is a coarse tool for such important decisions, and that a multitude of factors should be taken into account in these deliberations. When considering the use of the impact factor (IF), keep these aspects in mind:
  • IF analysis is limited to citations from the journals indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge. Currently, the Web of Science indexes only 8621 journals across the full breadth of the sciences, and just 3121 in the social sciences.
  • A high IF/citation rate says nothing about the quality -- or even, validity -- of the references being cited. Notorious or even retracted articles often attract a lot of attention, hence a high number of citations. The notority related to the first publication on "cold fusion" is one such example.
  • Journals that publish more "review articles" are often found near the top of the rankings. While not known for publishing new, creative findings, these individual articles tend to be heavily cited.
  • The IF measures the average number of citations to articles in the journal -- given this, a small number of highly-cited articles will skew the figure.
  • It takes several years for new journals to be added to the list of titles indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge, so these newer titles will be under-represented.
  • It's alleged that journal editors have learned to "game" the system, encouraging authors to cite their works previously published in the same journal.
Comparing Journals Across Disciplines? Not a good idea! Using Impact Factors within a given discipline should only be done with great care, as described above. Using impact factor data to compare journals across disciplines is even more problematic. Here are some of the reasons:
  • Disciplines where older literature is still referenced, such as Chemistry and Mathematics, offer challenges to the methodolgy since older citations (older than two years) are not used to calculate the impact factor for a given journal. (Five-year impact factor analysis, which can be calculated using the Journal Citation Index database, helps smooth out this problem only to some degree.)
  • Different disciplines have different practices regarding tendency to cite larger numbers of references. Higher overall citation rates will bump upward impact factor measurements.
  • Where it's common for large numbers of authors to collaborate on a single paper, such as in Physics, the tendency of authors to cite themselves (and in this case, more authors) will result in increased citation rates.

Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor

Pros:

  • A vetted, established metric for measuring journal impact within a discipline.
  • Designed to eliminate bias based on journal size and frequency.
Cons:
  • Individual articles makes an uneven contribution to overall Impact Factor.
  • Impact Factor does not account for certain things, things like context (postive or negative citaion) and intentionality (self-citation).
  • The metric is proprietary to and bound by the contents of the Thomson Reuters database.
  • Citations, on which the Impact Factor is based, count for less than 1% of an article's overall use.

Criticism

Numerous critiques have been made regarding the use of impact factors. A 2007 study noted that the most fundamental flaw is that impact factors present the mean of data that are not normally distributed, and suggested that it would be more appropriate to present the median of these data. There is also a more general debate on the validity of the impact factor as a measure of journal importance and the effect of policies that editors may adopt to boost their impact factor (perhaps to the detriment of readers and writers). Other criticism focuses on the effect of the impact factor on behavior of scholars, editors and other stakeholders. Others have made more general criticisms, arguing that emphasis on impact factor results from negative influence of neoliberal policies on academia claiming that what is needed is not just replacement of the impact factor with more sophisticated metrics for science publications but also discussion on the social value of research assessment and the growing precariousness of scientific careers in higher education.
Experts stress that there are limitations in using impact factors to evaluate a scholar's work. There are many reasons cited for not relying on impact factor alone to evaluate the output of a particular individual. Among these are the following:

  • A single factor is not sufficient for evaluating an author's work.
  • Journal values are meaningless unless compared within the same discipline. Impact factors vary among disciplines.
  • The impact factor was originally devised to show the impact of a specific journal, not a specific scholar. The quality and impact of the author's work may extend beyond the impact of a particular journal.
According to Jim Testa, a researcher for ThomsonReuters Scientific, the most widespread misuse of the Impact Factor is to evaluate the work of an individual author (instead of a journal). "To say that because a researcher is publishing in a certain journal, he or she is more influential or deserves more credit is not necessarily true. There are many other variables to consider." (interview 6/26/2008 in Thomson Reuters blog entry)

Harvard Review of Psychiatry
Journal Profile

About

The Harvard Review of Psychiatry is the authoritative source for scholarly reviews and perspectives on important topics in psychiatry. Founded by the Harvard Medical School's Department of Psychiatry, the Harvard Review of Psychiatry features review papers that summarize and synthesize the key literature in a scholarly and clinically relevant manner. Topics covered include: Schizophrenia and related disorders; Mood disorders; Personality disorders; Substance use disorders; Anxiety; Neuroscience; Psychosocial aspects of psychiatry; Ethics; Psychiatric education; and much more. In addition, a Clinical Challenges section presents a case with discussion from a panel of experts. Brief reviews are presented in topic-specific columns that include Cross-Cultural Psychiatry, History of Psychiatry, Ethics, and others. The Harvard Review of Psychiatry is a peer-reviewed medical journal covering all aspects of psychiatry. The editor-in-chief is Joshua L. Roffman. According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2017 impact factor of 3.264.

Highly Cited Keywords

ISSN
1067-3229
ISSN

The ISSN of Harvard Review of Psychiatry is 1067-3229 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

ISSN (Online)
1465-7309
ISSN (Online)

The ISSN (Online) of Harvard Review of Psychiatry is 1465-7309 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

Publisher
Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.
Publisher

Harvard Review of Psychiatry is published by Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd. .

Publication Frequency
Bimonthly
Publication Frequency

Harvard Review of Psychiatry publishes reports Bimonthly .

Coverage
1993 - Present
Coverage

The Publication History of Harvard Review of Psychiatry covers 1993 - Present .

Open Access
NO
Open Access

Harvard Review of Psychiatry is Subscription-based (non-OA) Journal. Publishers own the rights to the articles in their journals. Anyone who wants to read the articles should pay by individual or institution to access the articles. Anyone who wants to use the articles in any way must obtain permission from the publishers.

Publication Fee
Publication Fee

There is no publication fee for submiting manuscript to Harvard Review of Psychiatry. Harvard Review of Psychiatry is Subscription-based (non-OA) Journal. Publishers own the rights to the articles in their journals. Anyone who wants to read the articles should pay by individual or institution to access the articles.

Language
English
Language

The language of Harvard Review of Psychiatry is English .

Country/Region
United States
Country/Region

The publisher of Harvard Review of Psychiatry is Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd. , which locates in United States .

Selected Articles

Full Title Authors
Full Title Authors
The Prevalence of Negative Symptoms Across the Stages of the Psychosis Continuum Geneviève Sauvé · Mathieu B. Brodeur · Jai Shah · Martin Lepage · Martin Lepage
A Brief Overview of Advances in LGBT Mental Health Advocacy in Lebanon Omar Fattal · Hossam Mahmoud · Lama Bazzi · Lama Bazzi
Community, Public Policy, and Recovery from Mental Illness: Emerging Research and Initiatives Enrico G. Castillo · Bowen Chung · Elizabeth Bromley · Sheryl H. Kataoka · Joel T. Braslow · Susan M. Essock · Alexander S. Young · Jared M. Greenberg · Jeanne Miranda · Lisa B. Dixon · Kenneth B. Wells · Kenneth B. Wells
Glutamatergic Modulators in Depression Ioline D. Henter · Rafael T. de Sousa · Carlos A. Zarate · Carlos A. Zarate
A Fourth Wave of Psychotherapies: Moving Beyond Recovery Toward Well-Being John R. Peteet · John R. Peteet
Living high and feeling low: Altitude, suicide, and depression Brent M. Kious · Douglas G. Kondo · Perry F. Renshaw · Perry F. Renshaw
Ketamine-associated Brain Changes: A Review of the Neuroimaging Literature Dawn F. Ionescu · Julia M. Felicione · Aishwarya Gosai · Cristina Cusin · Philip Shin · Benjamin G. Shapero · Thilo Deckersbach · Thilo Deckersbach
Glucocorticoids and Hippocampal Structure and Function in PTSD Philip R. Szeszko · Amy Lehrner · Rachel Yehuda · Rachel Yehuda
Understanding Resilience and Preventing and Treating Ptsd Sarah R. Horn · Adriana Feder · Adriana Feder
Evidenced-based Treatment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: An Updated Review of Validated Psychotherapeutic and Pharmacological Approaches Meredith E. Charney · Samantha N. Hellberg · Eric Bui · Naomi M. Simon · Naomi M. Simon
Fear Processing, Psychophysiology, and PTSD Seth D. Norrholm · Tanja Jovanovic · Tanja Jovanovic
Functional Neuroanatomy of Emotion and Its Regulation in PTSD Jacklynn M. Fitzgerald · Julia A. DiGangi · K. Luan Phan · K. Luan Phan
Ambushed by Memories of Trauma: Memory-Processing Interventions in an Adolescent Boy with Nocturnal Dissociative Episodes Lux Ratnamohan · Laurie MacKinnon · Melissa Lim · Richard Webster · Karen Waters · Kasia Kozlowska · Joyanna Silberg · Ricky Greenwald · Monique Ribeiro · Monique Ribeiro
Conceptualization, Assessment, and Treatment of Traumatic Stress in First Responders: A Review of Critical Issues Nina F. Lewis-Schroeder · Kathryn Kieran · Beth L. Murphy · Jonathan Wolff · Matthew A. Robinson · Milissa Kaufman · Milissa Kaufman
Partners of Individuals with Borderline Personality Disorder: A Systematic Review of the Literature Examining Their Experiences and the Supports Available to Them Holly Greer · Jacqueline N. Cohen · Jacqueline N. Cohen
Depression and Anxiety in Heart Failure: A Review Christopher M. Celano · Ana C. Villegas · Ariana M. Albanese · Hanna K. Gaggin · Jeff C. Huffman · Jeff C. Huffman
Compassion and Loving-Kindness Meditation: An Overview and Prospects for the Application in Clinical Samples Johannes Graser · Ulrich Stangier · Ulrich Stangier
Development of a Boston Treatment Program for Youth at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis: Center for Early Detection, Assessment, and Response to Risk (CEDAR) Michelle Friedman-Yakoobian · Michelle L. West · Kristen A. Woodberry · Keira O’Donovan · Suzannah V. Zimmet · Andréa Gnong-Granato · Anthony J. Giuliano · Margaret Guyer · Janine Rodenhiser-Hill · Matcheri S. Keshavan · Larry J. Seidman · Larry J. Seidman
Characterizing, Assessing, and Treating Cognitive Dysfunction in Major Depressive Disorder Roger S. McIntyre · Yena Lee · Nicole E. Carmona · Mehala Subramaniapillai · Danielle S. Cha · Jung Goo Lee · Jae-Hon Lee · Asem Alageel · Nelson B. Rodrigues · Caroline Park · Renee-Marie Ragguett · Joshua E. Rosenblat · Fahad Almatham · Zihang Pan · Carola Rong · Rodrigo B. Mansur · Rodrigo B. Mansur
Prescription Benzodiazepine Use Among Older Adults: A Critical Review Lauren B. Gerlach · Ilse R. Wiechers · Donovan T. Maust · Donovan T. Maust
Animal Models in Psychiatric Disease: A Circuit-Search Approach Brian Theyel · Brian Theyel
Efficacy and Safety of Intensive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Tomas Sverak · Libor Ustohal · Libor Ustohal
Mirtazapine Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Implications of Alpha-Adrenergic Pharmacology on the Startle Response Ian R. McGrane · Michael D. Shuman · Michael D. Shuman
Suicidal risk and affective temperaments, evaluated with the TEMPS-A scale: A systematic review Gustavo H. Vázquez · Gustavo H. Vázquez · Gustavo H. Vázquez · Xenia Gonda · María Lolich · María Lolich · Leonardo Tondo · Ross J. Baldessarini · Ross J. Baldessarini
Clinical and Environmental Risk Factors for Bipolar Disorder: Review of Prospective Studies Ciro Marangoni · Gianni L. Faedda · Ross J. Baldessarini · Ross J. Baldessarini
Diagnostic Stability in Bipolar Disorder: A Narrative Review Fanny B. Cegla-Schvartzman · Santiago Ovejero · Jorge Lopez-Castroman · Enrique Baca-Garcia · Enrique Baca-Garcia
Uncharted Waters: Developing Mental Health Services for Survivors of Domestic Human Sex Trafficking Abigail M. Judge · Abigail M. Judge
Interoception in Psychiatric Disorders: A Review of Randomized, Controlled Trials with Interoception-Based Interventions Nayla M. Khoury · Jacqueline Lutz · Zev Schuman-Olivier · Zev Schuman-Olivier
Hyperventilation-induced Non-epileptic Seizures in an Adolescent Boy with Pediatric Medical Traumatic Stress P Chandra · Kasia Kozlowska · Catherine Cruz · Gaston Baslet · David L. Perez · Me Garralda Hualde · Me Garralda Hualde
Predictors of Pharmacotherapy Response in Generalized Anxiety Disorder: A Systematic Review Rafael Ferreira-Garcia · Marina Dyskant Mochcovitch · Mariana Costa do Cabo · Antonio Egidio Nardi · Rafael C. Freire · Rafael C. Freire
Neurocircuits to Behavior: The New Revolution Kerry J. Ressler · Kerry J. Ressler
Cognitive Decline in a Case of Poorly Controlled Bipolar Disorder: A Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenge Robyn Thom · Polina Teslyar · Alana Kirby · Tamara G. Fong · Rohn Friedman · Roscoe O. Brady · Kerry Bloomingdale · Kerry Bloomingdale
Pharmacological Treatment of ADHD in Addicted Patients: What Does the Literature Tell Us? Pieter-Jan Carpentier · Frances R. Levin · Frances R. Levin
How Well Do We Understand the Long-term Health Implications of Childhood Bullying? Pablo Patricio Zarate-Garza · Bridget K. Biggs · Paul E. Croarkin · Brooke Morath · Jarrod M. Leffler · Alfredo B. Cuellar-Barboza · Susannah J. Tye · Susannah J. Tye
Dementia, Decision Making, and Capacity R. Ryan Darby · Bradford C. Dickerson · Bradford C. Dickerson
The Science of Addiction and Criminal Law Stephen J. Morse · Stephen J. Morse
Neuroimaging in Psychiatry: A Quarter Century of Progress David Silbersweig · Scott L. Rauch · Scott L. Rauch
Heads Up: The Presentation of Schizoaffective Disorder in an Elite College Soccer Player with Prior Concussion Solomon J. Adelsky · Simon Ducharme · Emily K. Wilner · Benjamin Yudkoff · Simon Lejeune · Simon Lejeune
Behavioral Genetics in Criminal and Civil Courts Maya Sabatello · Paul S. Appelbaum · Paul S. Appelbaum
Neurotherapeutic Interventions for Psychiatric Illness Darin D. Dougherty · Alik S. Widge · Alik S. Widge
Mental Health Problems in a Community After the Great East Japan Earthquake in 2011: A Systematic Review Shuntaro Ando · Hitoshi Kuwabara · Tsuyoshi Araki · Akiko Kanehara · Shintaro Tanaka · Ryo Morishima · Shinsuke Kondo · Kiyoto Kasai · Kiyoto Kasai
Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, and Neuroprogression in Chronic PTSD Mark W. Miller · Alexander Lin · Erika J. Wolf · Danielle R. Miller · Danielle R. Miller
Legal Evidence of Subjective States: A Brain-Based Model of Chronic Pain Increases Accuracy and Fairness in Law Amanda C. Pustilnik · Amanda C. Pustilnik
A Quarter Century of Progress in Psychiatric Genetics Jordan W. Smoller · Jordan W. Smoller
Methodology and Reporting of Mobile Health and Smartphone Application Studies for Schizophrenia John Torous · John Torous · Joseph Firth · Nora Mueller · Jukka-Pekka Onnela · Justin T. Baker · Justin T. Baker · Justin T. Baker
Differences in the expression of symptoms in men versus women with depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis Anna Cavanagh · Coralie J Wilson · David J. Kavanagh · Peter Caputi · Peter Caputi
Internet-Based Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Depression: Current Progress and Future Directions Christian A. Webb · Isabelle M. Rosso · Scott L. Rauch · Scott L. Rauch
The Role of Stigma and Denormalization in Suicide-Prevention Laws in East Asia: A Sociocultural, Historical, and Ethical Perspective Justin A. Chen · Andrew Courtwright · Kevin Chien-Chang Wu · Kevin Chien-Chang Wu
Practical Issues in Delivery of Clinician-to-Patient Telemental Health in an Academic Medical Center Jessica Abrams · Sarah Sossong · Lee H. Schwamm · Lauren Barsanti · Michael Carter · Naomi Kling · Meghan Kotarski · Jaclyn Leddy · Benjamin Meller · Marcy Simoni · Michael Sullivan · Janet Wozniak · Janet Wozniak
Addiction—25 Years Later Shelly F. Greenfield · Roger D. Weiss · Roger D. Weiss
The Use of Virtual Reality Technology in the Treatment of Anxiety and Other Psychiatric Disorders Jessica L. Maples-Keller · Brian E. Bunnell · Sae‐Jin Kim · Barbara O. Rothbaum · Barbara O. Rothbaum
Technology-Based Interventions for Substance Use and Comorbid Disorders: An Examination of the Emerging Literature Dawn E. Sugarman · Aimee Campbell · Brittany R. Iles · Shelly F. Greenfield · Shelly F. Greenfield
Mobile Technologies in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry: Pushing for Further Awareness and Research Shih Yee-Marie Tan Gipson · John Torous · Eleni Maneta · Eleni Maneta
The Prevalence of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Primary Care: A Systematic Review Margaret Spottswood · Dimitry S. Davydow · Hsiang Huang · Hsiang Huang
A Case of Functional Dystonia with Associated Functional Neurological Symptoms: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenges Christopher Stephen · Nutan Sharma · Janet Callahan · Alan J. Carson · David L. Perez · David L. Perez
Psychotherapy over the last four decades Myrna M. Weissman · Pim Cuijpers · Pim Cuijpers
Bipolar Disorder and Early Emotional Trauma: A Critical Literature Review on Indicators of Prevalence Rates and Clinical Outcomes Aline Limiéri Dualibe · Flávia L. Osório · Flávia L. Osório
Treating Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in the Postpartum Period: Diagnostic and Cultural Considerations Angela Fang · Noah C. Berman · Justin A. Chen · Lisa Zakhary · Lisa Zakhary
Scope, Scale, and Dose of the Worlds Largest School-based Mental Health Programs J. M. Murphy · Madelaine R. Abel · S Hoover · Michael S. Jellinek · Mina Fazel · Mina Fazel
Resting-state Functional Connectivity in the Human Connectome Project: Current Status and Relevance to Understanding Psychopathology M Deanna · M Deanna
Ambivalence About Recovery in a Case of Psychotic Illness: Diagnostic, Treatment, and Cultural Challenges Hermioni N. Lokko · Dost Öngür · John G. Gunderson · Justin A. Chen · Justin A. Chen
History of the Concept of Disconnectivity in Schizophrenia Joseph T. Coyle · Darrick T. Balu · Puhl · Glenn T. Konopaske · Glenn T. Konopaske
A systematic review of suicidality in people with intellectual disabilities Philip Dodd · Ailbhe Doherty · Suzanne Guerin · Suzanne Guerin
Integrating Early Intervention for Borderline Personality Disorder and Mood Disorders Andrew M. Chanen · Michael Berk · Katherine Thompson · Katherine Thompson
Psychosis Secondary to Anti-N-methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Encephalitis Geoffrey Raynor · Caroline Bader · Maya Srikanth · David S. Kroll · Thomas G. Gutheil · Aaron L. Berkowitz · Aaron L. Berkowitz
Emerging Treatments in Schizophrenia: Highlights from Recent Supplementation and Prevention Trials Hannah E. Brown · Joshua L. Roffman · Joshua L. Roffman
Cognitive Remediation for the Treatment of Cognitive Dysfunction in the Early Course of Psychosis Kathryn E. Lewandowski · Kathryn E. Lewandowski
A Cognitive Neuroscience View of Voice-Processing Abnormalities in Schizophrenia: A Window into Auditory Verbal Hallucinations? Tatiana Conde · Óscar F. Gonçalves · Ana P. Pinheiro · Ana P. Pinheiro
Oxytocin, Postnatal Depression, and Parenting: A Systematic Review Beth L. Mah · Beth L. Mah
Progress and Future Directions in Research on the Psychosis Prodrome: A Review for Clinicians Kristen A. Woodberry · Daniel I. Shapiro · Caitlin Bryant · Larry J. Seidman · Larry J. Seidman
Template to Perpetrate: An Update on Violence in Autism Spectrum Disorder David S. Im · David S. Im
The Impact of Resident Duty Hour and Supervision Changes: A Review William E. Greenberg · Jonathan F. Borus · Jonathan F. Borus
Offspring of parents with schizophrenia: a systematic review of developmental features across childhood Mohajer A. Hameed · Andrew J. Lewis · Andrew J. Lewis
The Longitudinal Course of Schizophrenia Across the Lifespan: Clinical, Cognitive, and Neurobiological Aspects Urs Heilbronner · Myrto Samara · Stefan Leucht · Peter Falkai · Thomas G. Schulze · Thomas G. Schulze
Postpartum Depression Screening: A Review for Psychiatrists Erin K. Smith · Priya Gopalan · Jody Glance · Pierre N. Azzam · Pierre N. Azzam
Clinical Observations About the Potential Benefits and Pitfalls of Between-Session Contacts with Borderline Patients Karen Jacob · Karen Jacob
Mind-Body Interactions in Anxiety and Somatic Symptoms Núria Mallorquí-Bagué · Antonio Bulbena · Guillem Pailhez · Sarah N. Garfinkel · Hugo D. Critchley · Hugo D. Critchley
Electrophysiological Endophenotypes for Schizophrenia Emily M. Owens · Peter Bachman · David C. Glahn · Carrie E. Bearden · Carrie E. Bearden
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder, Overweight, and Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Sharain Suliman · Lise Anthonissen · Jonathan Carr · Stefan S. du Plessis · Robin Emsley · Sian Hemmings · Christine Lochner · Nathaniel W. McGregor · Leigh van den Heuvel · Soraya Seedat · Soraya Seedat
Separating fact from fiction : an empirical examination of six myths about dissociative identity disorder Bethany L. Brand · Vedat Sar · Pam Stavropoulos · Christa Kruger · Marilyn Korzekwa · Alfonso Martínez-Taboas · Warwick Middleton · Warwick Middleton
The Psychopharmacology Algorithm Project at the Harvard South Shore Program: An Algorithm for Generalized Anxiety Disorder Harmony Raylen Abejuela · David N. Osser · David N. Osser
Evidence-Based Treatments for Borderline Personality Disorder: Implementation, Integration, and Stepped Care Lois W. Choi-Kain · Elizabeth B. Albert · John G. Gunderson · John G. Gunderson
Borderline Personality Disorder in the Emergency Department: Good Psychiatric Management Victor Hong · Victor Hong
Consideration of Clozapine and Gender-Affirming Medical Care for an HIV-Positive Person with Schizophrenia and Fluctuating Gender Identity Adrienne T. Gerken · Shunda McGahee · Alex S. Keuroghlian · Oliver Freudenreich · Oliver Freudenreich
Good Enough Psychiatric Residency Training in Borderline Personality Disorder: Challenges, Choice Points, and a Model Generalist Curriculum Brandon T. Unruh · John G. Gunderson · John G. Gunderson
Personality Disorders in DSM-5: A Commentary on the Perceived Process and Outcome of the Proposal of the Personality and Personality Disorders Work Group Kenneth R. Silk · Kenneth R. Silk
A Neurobiological Model of Borderline Personality Disorder: Systematic and Integrative Review Anthony C. Ruocco · Dean Carcone · Dean Carcone
The Differential Diagnosis and Treatment of Catatonia in Children and Adolescents Aaron J. Hauptman · Sheldon Benjamin · Sheldon Benjamin
Interacting Neural Processes of Feeding, Hyperactivity, Stress, Reward, and the Utility of the Activity-Based Anorexia Model of Anorexia Nervosa Rachel A. Ross · Yael Mandelblat-Cerf · Anne Mj Verstegen · Anne Mj Verstegen
Predictive Neuroimaging Markers of Psychotherapy Response: A Systematic Review Trisha Chakrabarty · John S. Ogrodniczuk · George Hadjipavlou · George Hadjipavlou
The role of temperament in the etiopathogenesis of bipolar spectrum illness Konstantinos N. Fountoulakis · Xenia Gonda · Ioanna Koufaki · Thomas H. Hyphantis · C. Robert Cloninger · C. Robert Cloninger

The Prevalence of Negative Symptoms Across the Stages of the Psychosis Continuum
Harvard Review of Psychiatry | 2018
Geneviève Sauvé · Mathieu B. Brodeur · Jai Shah · Martin Lepage · Martin Lepage
Community, Public Policy, and Recovery from Mental Illness: Emerging Research and Initiatives
Harvard Review of Psychiatry | 2018
Enrico G. Castillo · Bowen Chung · Elizabeth Bromley · Sheryl H. Kataoka · Joel T. Braslow · Susan M. Essock · Alexander S. Young · Jared M. Greenberg · Jeanne Miranda · Lisa B. Dixon · Kenneth B. Wells · Kenneth B. Wells
Glutamatergic Modulators in Depression
Harvard Review of Psychiatry | 2018
Ioline D. Henter · Rafael T. de Sousa · Carlos A. Zarate · Carlos A. Zarate