Current Osteoporosis Reports
Journal Impact IF - Analysis · Trend · Prediction · Ranking


New

Journal Impact IF

2019-2020

3.918

-0.2 %

Journal Impact IF Trend

Related Journals

Popular Journals

Current Osteoporosis Reports

The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of Current Osteoporosis Reports is 3.918, which is just updated in 2020.

Current Osteoporosis Reports Impact Factor
Highest IF
4.4
Highest Journal Impact IF

The highest Journal Impact IF of Current Osteoporosis Reports is 4.4.

Lowest IF
3.25
Lowest Journal Impact IF

The lowest Journal Impact IF of Current Osteoporosis Reports is 3.25.

Total Growth Rate
-11.0%
IF Total Growth Rate

The total growth rate of Current Osteoporosis Reports IF is -11.0%.

Annual Growth Rate
-1.2%
IF Annual Growth Rate

The annual growth rate of Current Osteoporosis Reports IF is -1.2%.

Journal Impact IF Ranking

Subcategory Quartile Rank Percentile
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Q1 40/217

Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 81%

Journal Impact IF Ranking

· In the Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism research field, the Quartile of Current Osteoporosis Reports is Q1. Current Osteoporosis Reports has been ranked #40 over 217 related journals in the Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism research category. The ranking percentile of Current Osteoporosis Reports is around 81% in the field of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism.

Current Osteoporosis Reports Impact Factor 2020-2021 Prediction

Current Osteoporosis Reports Impact Factor Predition System

Current Osteoporosis Reports Impact Factor Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community.

Predict Check All Preditions
Total Publications
779
Total Citations
21658

Annual Publication Volume

Annual Citation Record

International Collaboration Trend

Cited Documents Trend

Journal Impact IF History

Year Journal Impact IF
Year Journal Impact IF
2019-2020 3.918
2018-2019 3.927
2017-2018 4.287
2016-2017 4.081
2015-2016 3.643
2014-2015 3.25
2013-2014 3.679
2012-2013 3.622
2011-2012 4.4
Journal Impact IF History

· The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of Current Osteoporosis Reports is 3.918
· The 2018-2019 Journal Impact IF of Current Osteoporosis Reports is 3.927
· The 2017-2018 Journal Impact IF of Current Osteoporosis Reports is 4.287
· The 2016-2017 Journal Impact IF of Current Osteoporosis Reports is 4.081
· The 2015-2016 Journal Impact IF of Current Osteoporosis Reports is 3.643
· The 2014-2015 Journal Impact IF of Current Osteoporosis Reports is 3.25
· The 2013-2014 Journal Impact IF of Current Osteoporosis Reports is 3.679
· The 2012-2013 Journal Impact IF of Current Osteoporosis Reports is 3.622
· The 2011-2012 Journal Impact IF of Current Osteoporosis Reports is 4.4

Publications Cites Dataset

Year Publications Citations
Year Publications Citations
1999 0 2
2001 0 3
2002 0 2
2003 17 3
2004 18 12
2005 21 36
2006 23 184
2007 24 354
2008 22 472
2009 25 504
2010 33 641
2011 43 932
2012 44 1091
2013 53 1410
2014 60 1520
2015 52 1809
2016 44 1948
2017 68 2060
2018 80 2228
2019 57 2489
2020 85 3620
2021 10 338
Publications Cites Dataset

· The Current Osteoporosis Reports has published 0 reports and received 2 citations in 1999.
· The Current Osteoporosis Reports has published 0 reports and received 3 citations in 2001.
· The Current Osteoporosis Reports has published 0 reports and received 2 citations in 2002.
· The Current Osteoporosis Reports has published 17 reports and received 3 citations in 2003.
· The Current Osteoporosis Reports has published 18 reports and received 12 citations in 2004.
· The Current Osteoporosis Reports has published 21 reports and received 36 citations in 2005.
· The Current Osteoporosis Reports has published 23 reports and received 184 citations in 2006.
· The Current Osteoporosis Reports has published 24 reports and received 354 citations in 2007.
· The Current Osteoporosis Reports has published 22 reports and received 472 citations in 2008.
· The Current Osteoporosis Reports has published 25 reports and received 504 citations in 2009.
· The Current Osteoporosis Reports has published 33 reports and received 641 citations in 2010.
· The Current Osteoporosis Reports has published 43 reports and received 932 citations in 2011.
· The Current Osteoporosis Reports has published 44 reports and received 1091 citations in 2012.
· The Current Osteoporosis Reports has published 53 reports and received 1410 citations in 2013.
· The Current Osteoporosis Reports has published 60 reports and received 1520 citations in 2014.
· The Current Osteoporosis Reports has published 52 reports and received 1809 citations in 2015.
· The Current Osteoporosis Reports has published 44 reports and received 1948 citations in 2016.
· The Current Osteoporosis Reports has published 68 reports and received 2060 citations in 2017.
· The Current Osteoporosis Reports has published 80 reports and received 2228 citations in 2018.
· The Current Osteoporosis Reports has published 57 reports and received 2489 citations in 2019.
· The Current Osteoporosis Reports has published 85 reports and received 3620 citations in 2020.
· The Current Osteoporosis Reports has published 10 reports and received 338 citations in 2021.
· The total publications of Current Osteoporosis Reports is 779.
· The total citations of Current Osteoporosis Reports is 21658.

What is Impact Factor?

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly average number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factor values are often deemed to be more important, or carry more intrinsic prestige in their respective fields, than those with lower values.

Current Osteoporosis Reports | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones. According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.” Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. The Impact Factor of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. It is frequently used as a Metric for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher Impact Factor are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The Current Osteoporosis Reports Impact Factor IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2020) by papers published in the Current Osteoporosis Reports during the two preceding years (2018-2019). Note that 2020 Impact Factor are reported in 2021; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2020 publications have been processed by the indexing agency. New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1, are known zero values. Journals that are indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have been indexed for three years. Occasionally, Journal Citation Reports assigns an impact factor to new journals with less than two years of indexing, based on partial citation data. The calculation always uses two complete and known years of item counts, but for new titles one of the known counts is zero. Annuals and other irregular publications sometimes publish no items in a particular year, affecting the count. The impact factor relates to a specific time period; it is possible to calculate it for any desired period. In addition to the 2-year Impact Factor, the 3-year Impact Factor, 4-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Real-Time Impact Factor can provide further insights and factors into the impact of Current Osteoporosis Reports.

History

The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Impact factors are calculated yearly starting from 1975 for journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). ISI was acquired by Thomson Scientific & Healthcare in 1992, and became known as Thomson ISI. In 2018, Thomson ISI was sold to Onex Corporation and Baring Private Equity Asia. They founded a new corporation, Clarivate, which is now the publisher of the JCR.

Use

The impact factor is used to compare different journals within a certain field. The Web of Science indexes more than 11,500 science and social science journals. Journal impact factors are often used to evaluate the merit of individual articles and individual researchers. This use of impact factors was summarised by Hoeffel:

Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation. Experience has shown that in each specialty the best journals are those in which it is most difficult to have an article accepted, and these are the journals that have a high impact factor. Most of these journals existed long before the impact factor was devised. The use of impact factor as a measure of quality is widespread because it fits well with the opinion we have in each field of the best journals in our specialty....In conclusion, prestigious journals publish papers of high level. Therefore, their impact factor is high, and not the contrary.

Eugene Garfield

In brief, Impact factors may be used by:
  • Authors to decide where to submit an article for publication.
  • Libraries to make collection development decisions
  • Academic departments to assess academic productivity
  • Academic departments to make decisions on promotion and tenure.
As impact factors are a journal-level metric, rather than an article- or individual-level metric, this use is controversial. Garfield agrees with Hoeffel,but warns about the "misuse in evaluating individuals" because there is "a wide variation [of citations] from article to article within a single journal". Other things to consider about Impact Factors:
  • Many journals do not have an impact factor.
  • The impact factor cannot assess the quality of individual articles. Even if citations were evenly distributed among articles, the impact factor would only measure the interests of other researchers in an article, not its importance and usefulness.
  • Only research articles, technical notes and reviews are “citable” items. Editorials, letters, news items and meeting abstracts are “non-citable items”.
  • Only a small percentage of articles are highly cited and they are found in a small subset of journals. This small proportion accounts for a large percentage of citations.
  • Controversial papers, such as those based on fraudulent data, may be highly cited, distorting the impact factor of a journal.
  • Citation bias may exist. For example, English language resources may be favoured. Authors may cite their own work.
Moreover, informed and careful use of these impact data is essential, and should be based on a thorough understanding of the methodology used to generate impact factors. There are controversial aspects of using impact factors:
  • It is not clear whether the number of times a paper is cited measures its actual quality.
  • Some databases that calculate impact factors fail to incorporate publications including textbooks, handbooks and reference books.
  • Certain disciplines have low numbers of journals and usage. Therefore, one should only compare journals or researchers within the same discipline.
  • Review articles normally are cited more often and therefore can skew results.
  • Self-citing may also skew results.
  • Some resources used to calculate impact factors have inadequate international coverage.
  • Editorial policies can artificially inflate an impact factor.
Impact factors have often been used in advancement and tenure decision-making. Many recognize that this is a coarse tool for such important decisions, and that a multitude of factors should be taken into account in these deliberations. When considering the use of the impact factor (IF), keep these aspects in mind:
  • IF analysis is limited to citations from the journals indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge. Currently, the Web of Science indexes only 8621 journals across the full breadth of the sciences, and just 3121 in the social sciences.
  • A high IF/citation rate says nothing about the quality -- or even, validity -- of the references being cited. Notorious or even retracted articles often attract a lot of attention, hence a high number of citations. The notority related to the first publication on "cold fusion" is one such example.
  • Journals that publish more "review articles" are often found near the top of the rankings. While not known for publishing new, creative findings, these individual articles tend to be heavily cited.
  • The IF measures the average number of citations to articles in the journal -- given this, a small number of highly-cited articles will skew the figure.
  • It takes several years for new journals to be added to the list of titles indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge, so these newer titles will be under-represented.
  • It's alleged that journal editors have learned to "game" the system, encouraging authors to cite their works previously published in the same journal.
Comparing Journals Across Disciplines? Not a good idea! Using Impact Factors within a given discipline should only be done with great care, as described above. Using impact factor data to compare journals across disciplines is even more problematic. Here are some of the reasons:
  • Disciplines where older literature is still referenced, such as Chemistry and Mathematics, offer challenges to the methodolgy since older citations (older than two years) are not used to calculate the impact factor for a given journal. (Five-year impact factor analysis, which can be calculated using the Journal Citation Index database, helps smooth out this problem only to some degree.)
  • Different disciplines have different practices regarding tendency to cite larger numbers of references. Higher overall citation rates will bump upward impact factor measurements.
  • Where it's common for large numbers of authors to collaborate on a single paper, such as in Physics, the tendency of authors to cite themselves (and in this case, more authors) will result in increased citation rates.

Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor

Pros:

  • A vetted, established metric for measuring journal impact within a discipline.
  • Designed to eliminate bias based on journal size and frequency.
Cons:
  • Individual articles makes an uneven contribution to overall Impact Factor.
  • Impact Factor does not account for certain things, things like context (postive or negative citaion) and intentionality (self-citation).
  • The metric is proprietary to and bound by the contents of the Thomson Reuters database.
  • Citations, on which the Impact Factor is based, count for less than 1% of an article's overall use.

Criticism

Numerous critiques have been made regarding the use of impact factors. A 2007 study noted that the most fundamental flaw is that impact factors present the mean of data that are not normally distributed, and suggested that it would be more appropriate to present the median of these data. There is also a more general debate on the validity of the impact factor as a measure of journal importance and the effect of policies that editors may adopt to boost their impact factor (perhaps to the detriment of readers and writers). Other criticism focuses on the effect of the impact factor on behavior of scholars, editors and other stakeholders. Others have made more general criticisms, arguing that emphasis on impact factor results from negative influence of neoliberal policies on academia claiming that what is needed is not just replacement of the impact factor with more sophisticated metrics for science publications but also discussion on the social value of research assessment and the growing precariousness of scientific careers in higher education.
Experts stress that there are limitations in using impact factors to evaluate a scholar's work. There are many reasons cited for not relying on impact factor alone to evaluate the output of a particular individual. Among these are the following:

  • A single factor is not sufficient for evaluating an author's work.
  • Journal values are meaningless unless compared within the same discipline. Impact factors vary among disciplines.
  • The impact factor was originally devised to show the impact of a specific journal, not a specific scholar. The quality and impact of the author's work may extend beyond the impact of a particular journal.
According to Jim Testa, a researcher for ThomsonReuters Scientific, the most widespread misuse of the Impact Factor is to evaluate the work of an individual author (instead of a journal). "To say that because a researcher is publishing in a certain journal, he or she is more influential or deserves more credit is not necessarily true. There are many other variables to consider." (interview 6/26/2008 in Thomson Reuters blog entry)

Current Osteoporosis Reports
Journal Profile

About

This journal intends to provide clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts that review the most important, recently published clinical findings related to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of osteoporosis.We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as current and future therapeutics, epidemiology and pathophysiology, and evaluation and management. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided. None

Highly Cited Keywords

ISSN
1544-1873
ISSN

The ISSN of Current Osteoporosis Reports is 1544-1873 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

ISSN (Online)
1544-2241
ISSN (Online)

The ISSN (Online) of Current Osteoporosis Reports is 1544-2241 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

Publisher
Current Science, Inc.
Publisher

Current Osteoporosis Reports is published by Current Science, Inc. .

Publication Frequency
Quarterly
Publication Frequency

Current Osteoporosis Reports publishes reports Quarterly .

Coverage
2003 - Present
Coverage

The Publication History of Current Osteoporosis Reports covers 2003 - Present .

Open Access
NO
Open Access

Current Osteoporosis Reports is Subscription-based (non-OA) Journal. Publishers own the rights to the articles in their journals. Anyone who wants to read the articles should pay by individual or institution to access the articles. Anyone who wants to use the articles in any way must obtain permission from the publishers.

Publication Fee
Publication Fee

There is no publication fee for submiting manuscript to Current Osteoporosis Reports. Current Osteoporosis Reports is Subscription-based (non-OA) Journal. Publishers own the rights to the articles in their journals. Anyone who wants to read the articles should pay by individual or institution to access the articles.

Language
English
Language

The language of Current Osteoporosis Reports is English .

Country/Region
United States
Country/Region

The publisher of Current Osteoporosis Reports is Current Science, Inc. , which locates in United States .

Selected Articles

Full Title Authors
Full Title Authors
Solute Transport in the Bone Lacunar-Canalicular System (LCS) Liyun Wang · Liyun Wang
Mechanisms for Joint Pain in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA): from Cytokines to Central Sensitization Angela Zhang · Yvonne C. Lee · Yvonne C. Lee
Anabolic Strategies to Augment Bone Fracture Healing Scott J. Roberts · Hua Zhu Ke · Hua Zhu Ke
Current Understanding of Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Management of Atypical Femur Fractures Jessica Starr · Yu Kwang Donovan Tay · Elizabeth Shane · Elizabeth Shane
Mechanical Characterization of Bone: State of the Art in Experimental Approaches—What Types of Experiments Do People Do and How Does One Interpret the Results? Stacyann Bailey · Deepak Vashishth · Deepak Vashishth
Correction to: Are CT-Based Finite Element Model Predictions of Femoral Bone Strength Clinically Useful? Marco Viceconti · Muhammad Qasim · Pinaki Bhattacharya · Xinshan Li · Xinshan Li
Origin of Reparative Stem Cells in Fracture Healing Beth Bragdon · Chelsea S. Bahney · Chelsea S. Bahney
The Impact of Exercise in Rodent Models of Chronic Pain Mark H. Pitcher · Mark H. Pitcher
Extra-Alveolar Bone Screws for Conservative Correction of Severe Malocclusion Without Extractions or Orthognathic Surgery Chris C. H. Chang · Joshua S. Y. Lin · H. Y. Yeh · H. Y. Yeh
Part II: Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ)—Regeneration, Degeneration, and Adaptation W. Eugene Roberts · W. Eugene Roberts · W. Eugene Roberts · David L. Stocum · David L. Stocum
Are CT-Based Finite Element Model Predictions of Femoral Bone Strengthening Clinically Useful? Marco Viceconti · Muhammad Qasim · Pinaki Bhattacharya · Xinshan Li · Xinshan Li
Low-Magnitude Forces for Bone Modeling and Remodeling in Dentofacial Orthopedics Achint Utreja · Achint Utreja
Human Genetics of Sclerosing Bone Disorders Raphaël De Ridder · Eveline Boudin · Geert Mortier · Wim Van Hul · Wim Van Hul
The Role of Matrix Composition in the Mechanical Behavior of Bone Mustafa Unal · Mustafa Unal · Amy Creecy · Amy Creecy · Jeffry S. Nyman · Jeffry S. Nyman · Jeffry S. Nyman
Anabolic Therapy for the Treatment of Osteoporosis in Childhood Leanne Ward · Frank Rauch · Frank Rauch
Good, Bad, or Ugly: the Biological Roles of Bone Marrow Fat Lakshman Singh · Sonia Tyagi · Damian E. Myers · Gustavo Duque · Gustavo Duque
Screening Gene Knockout Mice for Variation in Bone Mass: Analysis by μCT and Histomorphometry David W. Rowe · Douglas J. Adams · Seung-Hyun Hong · Caibin Zhang · Dong-Guk Shin · C. Renata Rydzik · Li Chen · Zhihua Wu · Gaven Garland · Dana A. Godfrey · John P. Sundberg · Cheryl L. Ackert-Bicknell · Cheryl L. Ackert-Bicknell
Preclinical and translational studies in small ruminants (sheep and goat) as models for osteoporosis research Isabel R. Dias · José Arthur de Abreu Camassa · João P.A. Bordelo · Pedro Miguel Sousa Babo · Carlos Viegas · Nuno Dourado · Rui L. Reis · Manuela E. Gomes · Manuela E. Gomes
Marrow Fat—a New Target to Treat Bone Diseases? Beata Lecka-Czernik · Sudipta Baroi · Lance A. Stechschulte · Amit Sopan Chougule · Amit Sopan Chougule
Review of Superelastic Differential Force Archwires for Producing Ideal Orthodontic Forces: an Advanced Technology Potentially Applicable to Orthognathic Surgery and Orthopedics Michael L. Kuntz · Ryan Vadori · M. Ibraheem Khan · M. Ibraheem Khan
Surgical Approach to Bone Metastases Geoffrey W. Siegel · J. Sybil Biermann · Anda Alexandra Calinescu · Daniel E. Spratt · Nicholas J. Szerlip · Nicholas J. Szerlip
Clinical Relevance of Joint Hypermobility and Its Impact on Musculoskeletal Pain and Bone Mass Vito Guarnieri · Marco Castori · Marco Castori
Mouse Cre Models for the Study of Bone Diseases Sarah L. Dallas · Yixia Xie · Lora A. Shiflett · Yasuyoshi Ueki · Yasuyoshi Ueki
The New Possibilities fromBig Datato Overlooked Associations Between Diabetes, Biochemical Parameters, Glucose Control, and Osteoporosis Christian Kruse · Christian Kruse · Christian Kruse
Regenerative Medicine Strategies in Biomedical Implants Divya Bijukumar · Clay McGeehan · Mathew T. Mathew · Mathew T. Mathew
Endemic Molar Incisor Hypomineralization: a Pandemic Problem That Requires Monitoring by the Entire Health Care Community Paul M. Schneider · Margarita Silva · Margarita Silva
Clinical Management of Osteoporotic Fractures Adam Z. Khan · Richard D. Rames · Anna N. Miller · Anna N. Miller
Modeling Rare Bone Diseases in Animals Charles A. O’Brien · Roy Morello · Roy Morello
On the Relation of Bone Mineral Density and the Elastic Modulus in Healthy and Pathologic Bone Sabah Nobakhti · Sandra J. Shefelbine · Sandra J. Shefelbine
Fracture Prediction by Computed Tomography and Finite Element Analysis: Current and Future Perspectives Fjola Johannesdottir · Brett T. Allaire · Mary L. Bouxsein · Mary L. Bouxsein · Mary L. Bouxsein
Part I: Development and Physiology of the Temporomandibular Joint David L. Stocum · W. Eugene Roberts · W. Eugene Roberts
The Lipid Side of Bone Marrow Adipocytes: How Tumor Cells Adapt and Survive in Bone Jonathan Diedrich · Mackenzie K. Herroon · Erandi Rajagurubandara · Izabela Podgorski · Izabela Podgorski
Bone Marrow Adipose Tissue and Skeletal Health Shanmugam Muruganandan · Rajgopal Govindarajan · Christopher J. Sinal · Christopher J. Sinal
New Insights in Understanding and Treating Bone Fracture Pain Stefanie A.T. Mitchell · Lisa A. Majuta · Patrick W. Mantyh · Patrick W. Mantyh
Recent Advances and Future of Gene Therapy for Bone Regeneration Galina Shapiro · Raphael Lieber · Dan Gazit · Gadi Pelled · Gadi Pelled
Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Muscle–Bone Interactions when Bi-directionally Compromised Charlotte L. Phillips · Youngjae Jeong · Youngjae Jeong
The Role of the Immune Cells in Fracture Healing Gurpreet S. Baht · Linda Vi · Benjamin A. Alman · Benjamin A. Alman
Role of Marrow Adipocytes in Regulation of Energy Metabolism and Bone Homeostasis Jillian Cornish · Tao Wang · Jian-Ming Lin · Jian-Ming Lin
Targeting the Muscle-Bone Unit: Filling Two Needs with One Deed in the Treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Antoine Boulanger Piette · Dounia Hamoudi · Laetitia Marcadet · Françoise Morin · Anteneh Argaw · Leanne Ward · Jérôme Frenette · Jérôme Frenette
Gonadal Hormones in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Bone Health in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Jasna Aleksova · Alexander J. Rodríguez · Robert I. McLachlan · Peter G. Kerr · Frances Milat · Peter R. Ebeling · Peter R. Ebeling
Linking the Gut Microbiota to Bone Health in Anorexia Nervosa Nicole Aurigemma · Kristen J. Koltun · Hannah VanEvery · Connie J. Rogers · Mary Jane De Souza · Mary Jane De Souza
Marrow Adiposity and Hematopoiesis in Aging and Obesity: Exercise as an Intervention Vihitaben S. Patel · M. Ete Chan · Janet Rubin · Clinton T. Rubin · Clinton T. Rubin
Human Knee Meniscus Regeneration Strategies: a Review on Recent Advances Mamatha M. Pillai · J. Gopinathan · R. Selvakumar · Amitava Bhattacharyya · Amitava Bhattacharyya
Contributions of the Bone Microenvironment to Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance Pathogenesis Beatriz Gámez · Claire M. Edwards · Claire M. Edwards
Mechanisms of Osteoarthritis (OA) Pain Terence W. O’Neill · David T. Felson · David T. Felson
Micro-Finite Element Analysis of the Proximal Femur on the Basis of High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Images Chamith S. Rajapakse · Gregory Chang · Gregory Chang
The Influence of Cortical Porosity on the Strength of Bone During Growth and Advancing Age Sabashini K. Ramchand · Ego Seeman · Ego Seeman
Osteoblastic Factors in Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis Song-Chang Lin · Li-Yuan Yu-Lee · Sue-Hwa Lin · Sue-Hwa Lin
Using Mendelian Randomization to Decipher Mechanisms of Bone Disease Katerina Trajanoska · Fernando Rivadeneira · Fernando Rivadeneira
Carbon Nanomaterials for Treating Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures Jancineide Oliveira de Carvalho · Francílio de Carvalho Oliveira · Sérgio Antonio Pereira Freitas · Liana Martha Soares · Rita de Cássia Barros Lima · Licia de Sousa Gonçalves · Thomas J. Webster · Fernanda Roberta Marciano · A.O. Lobo · A.O. Lobo
Recent Progress in Sarcopenia Research: a Focus on Operationalizing a Definition of Sarcopenia Peggy M. Cawthon · Peggy M. Cawthon
PET-MRI for the Study of Metabolic Bone Disease James S. Yoder · Feliks Kogan · Garry E. Gold · Garry E. Gold
CKD-MBD: from the Pathogenesis to the Identification and Development of Potential Novel Therapeutic Targets Rosilene M. Elias · Maria Aparecida Dalboni · Ana Carolina E. Coelho · Rosa Maria Affonso Moysés · Rosa Maria Affonso Moysés
Crosstalk Between Sensory Nerves and Cancer in Bone Toshiyuki Yoneda · Masahiro Hiasa · Tatsuo Okui · Tatsuo Okui
Non-renal-Related Mechanisms of FGF23 Pathophysiology Mark R. Hanudel · Marciana Laster · Isidro B. Salusky · Isidro B. Salusky
Updates in CKD-Associated Osteoporosis Pascale Khairallah · Thomas L. Nickolas · Thomas L. Nickolas
Celiac Disease—Musculoskeletal Manifestations and Mechanisms in Children to Adults Haley M. Zylberberg · Benjamin Lebwohl · Peter H. Green · Peter H. Green
Current Understanding of the Pathophysiology of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw J. Chang · A. E. Hakam · Laurie K. McCauley · Laurie K. McCauley
Cortical Bone Mapping: Measurement and Statistical Analysis of Localised Skeletal Changes Graham Treece · Graham Treece
Epigenetics of Skeletal Diseases Alvaro del Real · Leyre Riancho-Zarrabeitia · Laura López-Delgado · José A. Riancho · José A. Riancho
Interactions Between Disseminated Tumor Cells and Bone Marrow Stromal Cells Regulate Tumor Dormancy D. Brooke Widner · Sun H. Park · Matthew R. Eber · Yusuke Shiozawa · Yusuke Shiozawa
Genetics of Osteopetrosis Eleonora Palagano · Ciro Menale · Cristina Sobacchi · Anna Villa · Anna Villa
Regulation of Bone Metabolism by microRNAs Hanna Taipaleenmäki · Hanna Taipaleenmäki
The Role of Bone Secreted Factors in Burn-Induced Muscle Cachexia Gordon L. Klein · Gordon L. Klein
Diabetes and Abdominal Aortic Calcification: a Systematic Review Emilie Frey Bendix · Eskild Johansen · Thomas Ringgaard · Martin Wolder · Jakob Starup-Linde · Jakob Starup-Linde
Metabolic Coupling Between Bone Marrow Adipose Tissue and Hematopoiesis Russell T. Turner · Stephen A. Martin · Urszula T. Iwaniec · Urszula T. Iwaniec
Exosomes in Extracellular Matrix Bone Biology Adrienn Pethő · Yinghua Chen · Anne George · Anne George
Recent Advances in Understanding Bisphosphonate Effects on Bone Mechanical Properties Matthew R. Allen · Matthew R. Allen · Matthew R. Allen · Matthew R. Allen
Clinical and Research Approaches to Treat Non-union Fracture Claudia Schlundt · Christian H. Bucher · Serafeim Tsitsilonis · Hanna Schell · Georg N. Duda · Katharina Schmidt-Bleek · Katharina Schmidt-Bleek
Progress of Regenerative Therapy in Orthopedics Pearlin · Sunita Nayak · Geetha Manivasagam · Dwaipayan Sen · Dwaipayan Sen
Transcriptional Mechanisms of Secondary Fracture Healing Joseph L. Roberts · David N. Paglia · Hicham Drissi · Hicham Drissi
Vertebral Fracture Identification as Part of a Comprehensive Risk Assessment in Patients with Osteoporosis John T. Schousboe · John T. Schousboe · John T. Schousboe
The Effects of Homocysteine on the Skeleton Mitsuru Saito · Keishi Marumo · Keishi Marumo
Importance of Recent Fracture as Predictor of Imminent Fracture Risk Amanda D. Schnell · Jeffrey R. Curtis · Kenneth G. Saag · Kenneth G. Saag
Mechanical Stimuli in the Local In Vivo Environment in Bone: Computational Approaches Linking Organ-Scale Loads to Cellular Signals Graeme R. Paul · Angad Malhotra · Ralph Müller · Ralph Müller
Bone Marrow Adipocyte Developmental Origin and Biology Joanna Bukowska · Trivia Frazier · Stanley G. Smith · Theodore P. Brown · Robert Bender · Michelle McCarthy · Xiying Wu · Bruce A. Bunnell · Jeffrey M. Gimble · Jeffrey M. Gimble
Dental Manifestations of Pediatric Bone Disorders Juan F. Yepes · Juan F. Yepes
Sclerostin: an Emerging Target for the Treatment of Cancer-Induced Bone Disease Michelle M. McDonald · Michelle M. McDonald · Jesus Delgado-Calle · Jesus Delgado-Calle
Epigenetics and Bone Remodeling Ali Husain · Matlock Jeffries · Matlock Jeffries
MicroRNA Transfer Between Bone Marrow Adipose and Multiple Myeloma Cells Luna Soley · Carolyne Falank · Michaela R. Reagan · Michaela R. Reagan · Michaela R. Reagan · Michaela R. Reagan
Parathyroid Diseases and T Cells M. Neale Weitzmann · Roberto Pacifici · Roberto Pacifici
Aging, Osteocytes, and Mechanotransduction Haniyeh Hemmatian · Haniyeh Hemmatian · Astrid D. Bakker · Jenneke Klein-Nulend · G. Harry van Lenthe · G. Harry van Lenthe
Parathyroid Hormone and Parathyroid Hormone-Related Protein Analogs in Osteoporosis Therapy Benjamin Z. Leder · Benjamin Z. Leder
Recent Discoveries in Monogenic Disorders of Childhood Bone Fragility Riikka E. Mäkitie · Anders Kämpe · Fulya Taylan · Outi Mäkitie · Outi Mäkitie
Wnt Signaling in Ewing Sarcoma, Osteosarcoma, and Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors Matthew G. Pridgeon · Matthew G. Pridgeon · Patrick J. Grohar · Matthew R. Steensma · Bart O. Williams · Bart O. Williams
Nutritional Rickets and Osteomalacia in the Twenty-first Century: Revised Concepts, Public Health, and Prevention Strategies Suma Uday · Wolfgang Högler · Wolfgang Högler · Wolfgang Högler
Microcephalic Osteodysplastic Primordial Dwarfism, Type II: a Clinical Review Michael B. Bober · Michael B. Bober · Andrew P. Jackson · Andrew P. Jackson
Connexins and Pannexins in Bone and Skeletal Muscle Lilian I. Plotkin · Lilian I. Plotkin · Hannah M. Davis · Bruno A. Cisterna · Juan C. Sáez · Juan C. Sáez · Juan C. Sáez
Physical Activity for Strengthening Fracture Prone Regions of the Proximal Femur Robyn K. Fuchs · Mariana E. Kersh · Julio Carballido-Gamio · William R. Thompson · Joyce H. Keyak · Stuart J. Warden · Stuart J. Warden
Effects of Excessive Dietary Phosphorus Intake on Bone Health Colby J. Vorland · Elizabeth R. Stremke · Ranjani N. Moorthi · Kathleen M. Hill Gallant · Kathleen M. Hill Gallant · Kathleen M. Hill Gallant
Bone Pain and Muscle Weakness in Cancer Patients Daniel P. Milgrom · Neha Lad · Leonidas G. Koniaris · Teresa A. Zimmers · Teresa A. Zimmers
Response toClinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk Anne B. Loucks · Brian C. Clark · Lyn Bowman · Lyn Bowman
Denosumab: an Emerging Therapy in Pediatric Bone Disorders Alison M. Boyce · Alison M. Boyce
Osteomacs and Bone Regeneration Lena Batoon · Susan Millard · Liza J. Raggatt · Allison R. Pettit · Allison R. Pettit
microRNA Regulation of Skeletal Development Steven R. Sera · Nicole I. zur Nieden · Nicole I. zur Nieden
Myeloma and Bone Disease Cristina Panaroni · Andrew Yee · Noopur Raje · Noopur Raje
Musculoskeletal Health in the Context of Spinal Cord Injury Jillian Clark · David M. Findlay · David M. Findlay
The Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) Complements DXA and the FRAX as a Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in Routine Clinical Practice Didier Hans · Emőke Šteňová · Olivier Lamy · Olivier Lamy
Current Status of the Female Athlete Triad: Update and Future Directions Mary Jane De Souza · Kristen J. Koltun · Clara V. Etter · Emily A. Southmayd · Emily A. Southmayd
Exercise Frequency and Fracture Risk in Older Adults—How Often Is Enough? Wolfgang Kemmler · Simon von Stengel · Matthias Kohl · Matthias Kohl
Immune Contributions to Osteoarthritis Erika Barboza Prado Lopes · Adrian Filiberti · Syed Ali Husain · Mary Beth Humphrey · Mary Beth Humphrey
Chronic Recurrent Multifocal Osteomyelitis (CRMO): Presentation, Pathogenesis, and Treatment Sigrun R. Hofmann · Franz Kapplusch · Hermann Girschick · Henner Morbach · Jessica Pablik · Polly J. Ferguson · Christian M. Hedrich · Christian M. Hedrich
Diet and Exercise: a Match Made in Bone Hubertine M. E. Willems · Ellen G. H. M. van den Heuvel · Ruud Schoemaker · Jenneke Klein-Nulend · Astrid D. Bakker · Astrid D. Bakker
High Dietary Protein Intake and Protein-Related Acid Load on Bone Health Jay J. Cao · Jay J. Cao
Effects of Aging on Fracture Healing Dan Clark · Mary C. Nakamura · Ted Miclau · Ralph S. Marcucio · Ralph S. Marcucio
Muscle-Bone Interactions in Pediatric Bone Diseases Louis-Nicolas Veilleux · Frank Rauch · Frank Rauch
Engineering 3D Models of Tumors and Bone to Understand Tumor-Induced Bone Disease and Improve Treatments Kristin A. Kwakwa · Kristin A. Kwakwa · Joseph P. Vanderburgh · Joseph P. Vanderburgh · Scott A. Guelcher · Scott A. Guelcher · Julie A. Sterling · Julie A. Sterling · Julie A. Sterling
Osteoimmunology in Bone Fracture Healing Takehito Ono · Hiroshi Takayanagi · Hiroshi Takayanagi
Osteoporosis in Children with Chronic Illnesses: Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Treatment Monica Grover · Laura K. Bachrach · Laura K. Bachrach
Gut Microbiome and Bone: to Build, Destroy, or Both? Jing Yan · Julia F. Charles · Julia F. Charles
Inherited Arterial Calcification Syndromes: Etiologies and Treatment Concepts Yvonne Nitschke · Frank Rutsch · Frank Rutsch
Hypoxia and Bone Metastatic Disease Rachelle W. Johnson · Rachelle W. Johnson · Miranda E. Sowder · Miranda E. Sowder · Amato J. Giaccia · Amato J. Giaccia
Renal Osteodystrophy or Kidney-Induced Osteoporosis? Sharon M. Moe · Sharon M. Moe
TNF and Bone Remodeling Baohong Zhao · Baohong Zhao · Baohong Zhao
Hereditary Multiple Exostoses: New Insights into Pathogenesis, Clinical Complications, and Potential Treatments Maurizio Pacifici · Maurizio Pacifici
Renal Osteodystrophy—Time for Common Nomenclature Susan M. Ott · Susan M. Ott
Calcium Balance in Chronic Kidney Disease Kathleen M. Hill Gallant · David Spiegel · David Spiegel
Treatment of Pediatric Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder Mark R. Hanudel · Isidro B. Salusky · Isidro B. Salusky
The Role of the Molecular Clock in Skeletal Muscle and What It Is Teaching Us About Muscle-Bone Crosstalk Lance A. Riley · Karyn A. Esser · Karyn A. Esser
Biomarkers Predicting Bone Turnover in the Setting of CKD Pieter Evenepoel · Etienne Cavalier · Patrick C. D’Haese · Patrick C. D’Haese
T Regulatory Cells in Bone Remodelling Aline Bozec · Mario M. Zaiss · Mario M. Zaiss
Exploiting the WNT Signaling Pathway for Clinical Purposes Mark L. Johnson · Robert R. Recker · Robert R. Recker
In vivo Visualisation and Quantification of Bone Resorption and Bone Formation from Time-Lapse Imaging Patrik Christen · Ralph Müller · Ralph Müller
Using Osteoporosis Therapies in Combination Michael R. McClung · Michael R. McClung
Functional Diversity of Ciliary Proteins in Bone Development and Disease Masaru Kaku · Yoshihiro Komatsu · Yoshihiro Komatsu
Connexin43 and the Intercellular Signaling Network Regulating Skeletal Remodeling Megan C. Moorer · Joseph P. Stains · Joseph P. Stains
Sex-Differences in Skeletal Growth and Aging Jeri W. Nieves · Jeri W. Nieves
The Role of TGFβ in Bone-Muscle Crosstalk Jenna N. Regan · Trupti Trivedi · Theresa A. Guise · David L. Waning · David L. Waning
Genetic Disorders of Dental Development: Tales from the Bony Crypt Sylvia A. Frazier-Bowers · Siddharth R. Vora · Siddharth R. Vora
Is Diabetic Skeletal Fragility Associated with Microvascular Complications in Bone Roberto J. Fajardo · Roberto J. Fajardo
Melorheostosis: a Rare Sclerosing Bone Dysplasia Anupam Kotwal · Bart L. Clarke · Bart L. Clarke
Current Care and Investigational Therapies in Achondroplasia Sheila Unger · Luisa Bonafé · Elvire Gouze · Elvire Gouze
Osteoporosis: Treat-to-Target E. Michael Lewiecki · E. Michael Lewiecki
Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk Chantal M. J. de Bakker · Wei-Ju Tseng · Yihan Li · Hongbo Zhao · X. Sherry Liu · X. Sherry Liu
Long-Term Bisphosphonate Therapy in Osteogenesis Imperfecta Andrew Biggin · Andrew Biggin · Craig Munns · Craig Munns · Craig Munns
Skeletal Dysplasias: What Every Bone Health Clinician Needs to Know Sarah M. Nikkel · Sarah M. Nikkel
Vitamin D Activity and Metabolism in Bone Paul H. Anderson · Paul H. Anderson
Food Versus Pharmacy: Assessment of Nutritional and Pharmacological Strategies to Improve Bone Health in Energy-Deficient Exercising Women Emily A. Southmayd · Adelaide C. Hellmers · Mary Jane De Souza · Mary Jane De Souza
Response to Loucks et al.s Comment onClinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk X. Sherry Liu · Chantal M. J. de Bakker · Wei-Ju Tseng · Yihan Li · Hongbo Zhao · Hongbo Zhao
Erratum to: Microcephalic Osteodysplastic Primordial Dwarfism, Type II: a Clinical Review Michael B. Bober · Andrew P. Jackson · Andrew P. Jackson
Bone Marrow Stroma and Vascular Contributions to Myeloma Bone Homing Michele Moschetta · Yawara Kawano · Antonio Sacco · Angelo Belotti · Rossella Ribolla · Marco Chiarini · Viviana Giustini · Diego Bertoli · Alessandra Sottini · Monica Valotti · Claudia Ghidini · Federico Serana · Michele Malagola · Luisa Imberti · Domenico Russo · Alessandro Montanelli · Giuseppe Rossi · Michaela R. Reagan · Patricia Maiso · Bruno Paiva · Irene M. Ghobrial · Aldo M. Roccaro · Aldo M. Roccaro
Bone Quality in Chronic Kidney Disease: Definitions and Diagnostics Erin McNerny · Erin McNerny · Thomas L. Nickolas · Thomas L. Nickolas · Thomas L. Nickolas
What Animal Models Have Taught Us About the Safety and Efficacy of Bisphosphonates in Chronic Kidney Disease Matthew R. Allen · Matthew R. Allen · Matthew R. Allen · Mohammad W. Aref · Mohammad W. Aref
Osteonecrosis of the Jaw—a Bone Site-Specific Effect of Bisphosphonates Jenny A. F. Vermeer · Greetje A. P. Renders · Vincent Everts · Vincent Everts
Fibrous Dysplasia/McCune-Albright Syndrome: Clinical and Translational Perspectives Cemre Robinson · Michael T. Collins · Alison M. Boyce · Alison M. Boyce
Erratum to: Solid-State Quantitative 1H and 31P MRI of Cortical Bone in Humans Alan C. Seifert · Felix W. Wehrli · Felix W. Wehrli
Do Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) Cause Fractures Stuart J. Warden · Robyn K. Fuchs · Robyn K. Fuchs
Advances in Controlled Drug Delivery for Treatment of Osteoporosis T. A. Asafo-Adjei · A. J. Chen · A. Najarzadeh · D. A. Puleo · D. A. Puleo
MicroRNA Exert Macro Effects on Cancer Bone Metastasis Scott R. Baier · Yihong Wan · Yihong Wan
SOXC Genes and the Control of Skeletogenesis Véronique Lefebvre · Pallavi Bhattaram · Pallavi Bhattaram
Advances in Nanotechnology for the Treatment of Osteoporosis Mikayla E. Barry · Hannah Pearce · Lauren M. Cross · Marco Tatullo · Akhilesh K. Gaharwar · Akhilesh K. Gaharwar
The Skeletal Effects of Inhaled Glucocorticoids Stephanie A. Sutter · Emily M. Stein · Emily M. Stein
Crosstalk Between Muscle and Bone Via the Muscle-Myokine Irisin Graziana Colaianni · Teresa Mongelli · Silvia Colucci · Saverio Cinti · Maria Grano · Maria Grano
Skeletal Implications of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Barbara M Misof · Carolina Aguiar Moreira · Klaus Klaushofer · Paul Roschger · Paul Roschger
Osteoblastic Actions of the Neuropeptide Y System to Regulate Bone and Energy Homeostasis Harry Horsnell · Harry Horsnell · Paul A. Baldock · Paul A. Baldock · Paul A. Baldock · Paul A. Baldock
Aberrant Myeloid Differentiation Contributes to the Development of Osteoporosis in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Steven D. Rhodes · Feng Chun Yang · Feng Chun Yang
Risk Factors, Epidemiology and Treatment Strategies for Metabolic Bone Disease in Patients with Neurological Disease S. Binks · R. Dobson · R. Dobson · R. Dobson
Evolving Role of Molecular Imaging with 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET as a Biomarker for Calcium Metabolism William Y. Raynor · Sina Houshmand · Saeid Gholami · S Emamzadehfard · Chamith S. Rajapakse · Björn Alexander Blomberg · Björn Alexander Blomberg · Thomas Werner · Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen · Joshua F. Baker · Joshua F. Baker · Abass Alavi · Abass Alavi
The Role of the Microenvironment in Prostate Cancer-Associated Bone Disease Christina J. Turner · Claire M. Edwards · Claire M. Edwards
Bone and Celiac Disease María Belén Zanchetta · Vanesa Longobardi · Julio C. Bai · Julio C. Bai
Cortical Bone Porosity: What Is It, Why Is It Important, and How Can We Detect It? David M.L. Cooper · C. E. Kawalilak · K. Harrison · B. D. Johnston · James D. Johnston · James D. Johnston
In Situ Sensor Advancements for Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment Luting Liu · Thomas J. Webster · Thomas J. Webster · Thomas J. Webster · Thomas J. Webster
Emerging Targets for the Management of Osteoarthritis Pain Anne-Marie Malfait · Richard J. Miller · Richard J. Miller
Epidemiology of Skeletal Health in Type 1 Diabetes David R. Weber · George J. Schwartz · George J. Schwartz
Vitamin D Level Between Calcium-Phosphorus Homeostasis and Immune System: New Perspective in Osteoporosis Daniele Bellavia · Viviana Costa · Angela De Luca · Melania Maglio · Stefania Pagani · Milena Fini · Gianluca Giavaresi · Gianluca Giavaresi
Effects of Type 1 Diabetes on Osteoblasts, Osteocytes, and Osteoclasts Evangelia Kalaitzoglou · Iuliana Popescu · R. Clay Bunn · John L. Fowlkes · Kathryn M. Thrailkill · Kathryn M. Thrailkill
Advanced Glycation End Products, Diabetes, and Bone Strength Masahiro Yamamoto · Toshitsugu Sugimoto · Toshitsugu Sugimoto
Diabetes and Bone Marrow Adiposity Tiffany Y. Kim · Anne L. Schafer · Anne L. Schafer
Osteoporosis and Periodontitis Chin Wei (Jeff) Wang · Laurie K. McCauley · Laurie K. McCauley
Advances in the Classification and Treatment of Osteogenesis Imperfecta Inas H. Thomas · Linda A. DiMeglio · Linda A. DiMeglio
Nanotechnology Treatment Options for Osteoporosis and Its Corresponding Consequences Donglei Wei · Jinsuh Jung · Jinsuh Jung · Huilin Yang · David A. Stout · David A. Stout · Lei Yang · Lei Yang
The Role of Trunk Musculature in Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures: Implications for Prediction, Prevention, and Management Hossein Mokhtarzadeh · Hossein Mokhtarzadeh · Hossein Mokhtarzadeh · Dennis E. Anderson · Dennis E. Anderson · Dennis E. Anderson
Osteoporosis Associated with Epilepsy and the Use of Anti-Epileptics—a Review Sandra J. Petty · Helen Wilding · John D. Wark · John D. Wark · John D. Wark
Finite Element-Based Mechanical Assessment of Bone Quality on the Basis of In Vivo Images Dieter H. Pahr · Philippe Zysset · Philippe Zysset
Effects of Incretin-Based Therapies and SGLT2 Inhibitors on Skeletal Health Andrea Egger · Marius E. Kraenzlin · Christian Meier · Christian Meier
A Comparison of Peripheral Imaging Technologies for Bone and Muscle Quantification: a Mixed Methods Clinical Review Andy Kin On Wong · Andy Kin On Wong
Bone Response of Loaded Periodontal Ligament Eliane H. Dutra · Ravindra Nanda · Sumit Yadav · Sumit Yadav
Bone Density and Dental External Apical Root Resorption Alejandro Iglesias-Linares · Lorri A. Morford · James K. Hartsfield · James K. Hartsfield
Bone Microarchitecture in Type 1 Diabetes: It Is Complicated Hillary A. Keenan · Ernesto Maddaloni · Ernesto Maddaloni
Recent Tissue Engineering Advances for the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Disorders Ashkan Aryaei · Natalia Vapniarsky · Kyriacos A. Athanasiou · Kyriacos A. Athanasiou
Hajdu-Cheney Syndrome, a Disease Associated with NOTCH2 Mutations Ernesto Canalis · Stefano Zanotti · Stefano Zanotti
Tissue-Level Mechanical Properties of Bone Contributing to Fracture Risk Jeffry S. Nyman · Jeffry S. Nyman · Mathilde Granke · Robert C. Singleton · G.M. Pharr · G.M. Pharr · G.M. Pharr
The Bone Microenvironment: a Fertile Soil for Tumor Growth Patrick L. Mulcrone · Philip Owens · Julie A. Sterling · Julie A. Sterling
Lower Bone Mineral Density at the Hip and Lumbar Spine in People with Psychosis Versus Controls: a Comprehensive Review and Skeletal Site-Specific Meta-analysis Lucia Gomez · Brendon Stubbs · Brendon Stubbs · Ayala Shirazi · Davy Vancampfort · Fiona Gaughran · Fiona Gaughran · John Lally · John Lally · John Lally · John Lally
Solid-State Quantitative (1)H and (31)P MRI of Cortical Bone in Humans Alan C. Seifert · Felix W. Wehrli · Felix W. Wehrli