Circulation
Journal Impact IF - Analysis · Trend · Prediction · Ranking


New

Journal Impact IF

2019-2020

23.603

2.4%

Journal Impact IF Trend

Related Journals

Popular Journals

Circulation

The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of Circulation is 23.603, which is just updated in 2020.

Circulation Impact Factor
Highest IF
23.603
Highest Journal Impact IF

The highest Journal Impact IF of Circulation is 23.603.

Lowest IF
14.739
Lowest Journal Impact IF

The lowest Journal Impact IF of Circulation is 14.739.

Total Growth Rate
60.1%
IF Total Growth Rate

The total growth rate of Circulation IF is 60.1%.

Annual Growth Rate
6.7%
IF Annual Growth Rate

The annual growth rate of Circulation IF is 6.7%.

Journal Impact IF Ranking

Subcategory Quartile Rank Percentile
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine Q1 2/324

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 99%

Physiology (medical) Q1 2/99

Physiology (medical) 98%

Journal Impact IF Ranking

· In the Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine research field, the Quartile of Circulation is Q1. Circulation has been ranked #2 over 324 related journals in the Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine research category. The ranking percentile of Circulation is around 99% in the field of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.
· In the Physiology (medical) research field, the Quartile of Circulation is Q1. Circulation has been ranked #2 over 99 related journals in the Physiology (medical) research category. The ranking percentile of Circulation is around 98% in the field of Physiology (medical).

Circulation Impact Factor 2020-2021 Prediction

Circulation Impact Factor Predition System

Circulation Impact Factor Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community.

Predict Check All Preditions
Total Publications
115046
Total Citations
7182644

Annual Publication Volume

Annual Citation Record

International Collaboration Trend

Cited Documents Trend

Journal Impact IF History

Year Journal Impact IF
Year Journal Impact IF
2019-2020 23.603
2018-2019 23.054
2017-2018 18.881
2016-2017 19.309
2015-2016 17.202
2014-2015 15.073
2013-2014 14.948
2012-2013 15.202
2011-2012 14.739
Journal Impact IF History

· The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of Circulation is 23.603
· The 2018-2019 Journal Impact IF of Circulation is 23.054
· The 2017-2018 Journal Impact IF of Circulation is 18.881
· The 2016-2017 Journal Impact IF of Circulation is 19.309
· The 2015-2016 Journal Impact IF of Circulation is 17.202
· The 2014-2015 Journal Impact IF of Circulation is 15.073
· The 2013-2014 Journal Impact IF of Circulation is 14.948
· The 2012-2013 Journal Impact IF of Circulation is 15.202
· The 2011-2012 Journal Impact IF of Circulation is 14.739

Publications Cites Dataset

Year Publications Citations
Year Publications Citations
1948 13 0
1949 26 8
1950 290 118
1951 206 556
1952 220 979
1953 212 1441
1954 213 1797
1955 220 2002
1956 223 1962
1957 233 2398
1958 319 3328
1959 354 3583
1960 263 4799
1961 238 3948
1962 244 4454
1963 271 4322
1964 268 5321
1965 282 6023
1966 268 6469
1967 278 6529
1968 352 6863
1969 275 7746
1970 303 7501
1971 311 9161
1972 340 9885
1973 497 11734
1974 548 12197
1975 451 14038
1976 484 16473
1977 428 18669
1978 488 20225
1979 480 21114
1980 518 24481
1981 462 26555
1982 590 29616
1983 480 35786
1984 360 35475
1985 465 36707
1986 483 35834
1987 572 38230
1988 421 39147
1989 539 41579
1990 750 41858
1991 810 44756
1992 737 48236
1993 850 49824
1994 950 54348
1995 1317 69765
1996 1211 81134
1997 1531 93859
1998 1482 108940
1999 1591 120421
2000 1749 142619
2001 1770 152212
2002 2100 163199
2003 1978 191078
2004 2073 216917
2005 2039 241888
2006 5384 269079
2007 4939 288259
2008 5459 296010
2009 5355 315832
2010 5534 327411
2011 6136 351459
2012 6401 365133
2013 5752 374178
2014 7025 376567
2015 5291 363582
2016 5748 331641
2017 5036 321809
2018 2868 248143
2019 2911 250534
2020 3730 301562
2021 51 21338
Publications Cites Dataset

· The Circulation has published 13 reports and received 0 citations in 1948.
· The Circulation has published 26 reports and received 8 citations in 1949.
· The Circulation has published 290 reports and received 118 citations in 1950.
· The Circulation has published 206 reports and received 556 citations in 1951.
· The Circulation has published 220 reports and received 979 citations in 1952.
· The Circulation has published 212 reports and received 1441 citations in 1953.
· The Circulation has published 213 reports and received 1797 citations in 1954.
· The Circulation has published 220 reports and received 2002 citations in 1955.
· The Circulation has published 223 reports and received 1962 citations in 1956.
· The Circulation has published 233 reports and received 2398 citations in 1957.
· The Circulation has published 319 reports and received 3328 citations in 1958.
· The Circulation has published 354 reports and received 3583 citations in 1959.
· The Circulation has published 263 reports and received 4799 citations in 1960.
· The Circulation has published 238 reports and received 3948 citations in 1961.
· The Circulation has published 244 reports and received 4454 citations in 1962.
· The Circulation has published 271 reports and received 4322 citations in 1963.
· The Circulation has published 268 reports and received 5321 citations in 1964.
· The Circulation has published 282 reports and received 6023 citations in 1965.
· The Circulation has published 268 reports and received 6469 citations in 1966.
· The Circulation has published 278 reports and received 6529 citations in 1967.
· The Circulation has published 352 reports and received 6863 citations in 1968.
· The Circulation has published 275 reports and received 7746 citations in 1969.
· The Circulation has published 303 reports and received 7501 citations in 1970.
· The Circulation has published 311 reports and received 9161 citations in 1971.
· The Circulation has published 340 reports and received 9885 citations in 1972.
· The Circulation has published 497 reports and received 11734 citations in 1973.
· The Circulation has published 548 reports and received 12197 citations in 1974.
· The Circulation has published 451 reports and received 14038 citations in 1975.
· The Circulation has published 484 reports and received 16473 citations in 1976.
· The Circulation has published 428 reports and received 18669 citations in 1977.
· The Circulation has published 488 reports and received 20225 citations in 1978.
· The Circulation has published 480 reports and received 21114 citations in 1979.
· The Circulation has published 518 reports and received 24481 citations in 1980.
· The Circulation has published 462 reports and received 26555 citations in 1981.
· The Circulation has published 590 reports and received 29616 citations in 1982.
· The Circulation has published 480 reports and received 35786 citations in 1983.
· The Circulation has published 360 reports and received 35475 citations in 1984.
· The Circulation has published 465 reports and received 36707 citations in 1985.
· The Circulation has published 483 reports and received 35834 citations in 1986.
· The Circulation has published 572 reports and received 38230 citations in 1987.
· The Circulation has published 421 reports and received 39147 citations in 1988.
· The Circulation has published 539 reports and received 41579 citations in 1989.
· The Circulation has published 750 reports and received 41858 citations in 1990.
· The Circulation has published 810 reports and received 44756 citations in 1991.
· The Circulation has published 737 reports and received 48236 citations in 1992.
· The Circulation has published 850 reports and received 49824 citations in 1993.
· The Circulation has published 950 reports and received 54348 citations in 1994.
· The Circulation has published 1317 reports and received 69765 citations in 1995.
· The Circulation has published 1211 reports and received 81134 citations in 1996.
· The Circulation has published 1531 reports and received 93859 citations in 1997.
· The Circulation has published 1482 reports and received 108940 citations in 1998.
· The Circulation has published 1591 reports and received 120421 citations in 1999.
· The Circulation has published 1749 reports and received 142619 citations in 2000.
· The Circulation has published 1770 reports and received 152212 citations in 2001.
· The Circulation has published 2100 reports and received 163199 citations in 2002.
· The Circulation has published 1978 reports and received 191078 citations in 2003.
· The Circulation has published 2073 reports and received 216917 citations in 2004.
· The Circulation has published 2039 reports and received 241888 citations in 2005.
· The Circulation has published 5384 reports and received 269079 citations in 2006.
· The Circulation has published 4939 reports and received 288259 citations in 2007.
· The Circulation has published 5459 reports and received 296010 citations in 2008.
· The Circulation has published 5355 reports and received 315832 citations in 2009.
· The Circulation has published 5534 reports and received 327411 citations in 2010.
· The Circulation has published 6136 reports and received 351459 citations in 2011.
· The Circulation has published 6401 reports and received 365133 citations in 2012.
· The Circulation has published 5752 reports and received 374178 citations in 2013.
· The Circulation has published 7025 reports and received 376567 citations in 2014.
· The Circulation has published 5291 reports and received 363582 citations in 2015.
· The Circulation has published 5748 reports and received 331641 citations in 2016.
· The Circulation has published 5036 reports and received 321809 citations in 2017.
· The Circulation has published 2868 reports and received 248143 citations in 2018.
· The Circulation has published 2911 reports and received 250534 citations in 2019.
· The Circulation has published 3730 reports and received 301562 citations in 2020.
· The Circulation has published 51 reports and received 21338 citations in 2021.
· The total publications of Circulation is 115046.
· The total citations of Circulation is 7182644.

What is Impact Factor?

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly average number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factor values are often deemed to be more important, or carry more intrinsic prestige in their respective fields, than those with lower values.

Circulation | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones. According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.” Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. The Impact Factor of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. It is frequently used as a Metric for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher Impact Factor are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The Circulation Impact Factor IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2020) by papers published in the Circulation during the two preceding years (2018-2019). Note that 2020 Impact Factor are reported in 2021; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2020 publications have been processed by the indexing agency. New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1, are known zero values. Journals that are indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have been indexed for three years. Occasionally, Journal Citation Reports assigns an impact factor to new journals with less than two years of indexing, based on partial citation data. The calculation always uses two complete and known years of item counts, but for new titles one of the known counts is zero. Annuals and other irregular publications sometimes publish no items in a particular year, affecting the count. The impact factor relates to a specific time period; it is possible to calculate it for any desired period. In addition to the 2-year Impact Factor, the 3-year Impact Factor, 4-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Real-Time Impact Factor can provide further insights and factors into the impact of Circulation.

History

The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Impact factors are calculated yearly starting from 1975 for journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). ISI was acquired by Thomson Scientific & Healthcare in 1992, and became known as Thomson ISI. In 2018, Thomson ISI was sold to Onex Corporation and Baring Private Equity Asia. They founded a new corporation, Clarivate, which is now the publisher of the JCR.

Use

The impact factor is used to compare different journals within a certain field. The Web of Science indexes more than 11,500 science and social science journals. Journal impact factors are often used to evaluate the merit of individual articles and individual researchers. This use of impact factors was summarised by Hoeffel:

Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation. Experience has shown that in each specialty the best journals are those in which it is most difficult to have an article accepted, and these are the journals that have a high impact factor. Most of these journals existed long before the impact factor was devised. The use of impact factor as a measure of quality is widespread because it fits well with the opinion we have in each field of the best journals in our specialty....In conclusion, prestigious journals publish papers of high level. Therefore, their impact factor is high, and not the contrary.

Eugene Garfield

In brief, Impact factors may be used by:
  • Authors to decide where to submit an article for publication.
  • Libraries to make collection development decisions
  • Academic departments to assess academic productivity
  • Academic departments to make decisions on promotion and tenure.
As impact factors are a journal-level metric, rather than an article- or individual-level metric, this use is controversial. Garfield agrees with Hoeffel,but warns about the "misuse in evaluating individuals" because there is "a wide variation [of citations] from article to article within a single journal". Other things to consider about Impact Factors:
  • Many journals do not have an impact factor.
  • The impact factor cannot assess the quality of individual articles. Even if citations were evenly distributed among articles, the impact factor would only measure the interests of other researchers in an article, not its importance and usefulness.
  • Only research articles, technical notes and reviews are “citable” items. Editorials, letters, news items and meeting abstracts are “non-citable items”.
  • Only a small percentage of articles are highly cited and they are found in a small subset of journals. This small proportion accounts for a large percentage of citations.
  • Controversial papers, such as those based on fraudulent data, may be highly cited, distorting the impact factor of a journal.
  • Citation bias may exist. For example, English language resources may be favoured. Authors may cite their own work.
Moreover, informed and careful use of these impact data is essential, and should be based on a thorough understanding of the methodology used to generate impact factors. There are controversial aspects of using impact factors:
  • It is not clear whether the number of times a paper is cited measures its actual quality.
  • Some databases that calculate impact factors fail to incorporate publications including textbooks, handbooks and reference books.
  • Certain disciplines have low numbers of journals and usage. Therefore, one should only compare journals or researchers within the same discipline.
  • Review articles normally are cited more often and therefore can skew results.
  • Self-citing may also skew results.
  • Some resources used to calculate impact factors have inadequate international coverage.
  • Editorial policies can artificially inflate an impact factor.
Impact factors have often been used in advancement and tenure decision-making. Many recognize that this is a coarse tool for such important decisions, and that a multitude of factors should be taken into account in these deliberations. When considering the use of the impact factor (IF), keep these aspects in mind:
  • IF analysis is limited to citations from the journals indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge. Currently, the Web of Science indexes only 8621 journals across the full breadth of the sciences, and just 3121 in the social sciences.
  • A high IF/citation rate says nothing about the quality -- or even, validity -- of the references being cited. Notorious or even retracted articles often attract a lot of attention, hence a high number of citations. The notority related to the first publication on "cold fusion" is one such example.
  • Journals that publish more "review articles" are often found near the top of the rankings. While not known for publishing new, creative findings, these individual articles tend to be heavily cited.
  • The IF measures the average number of citations to articles in the journal -- given this, a small number of highly-cited articles will skew the figure.
  • It takes several years for new journals to be added to the list of titles indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge, so these newer titles will be under-represented.
  • It's alleged that journal editors have learned to "game" the system, encouraging authors to cite their works previously published in the same journal.
Comparing Journals Across Disciplines? Not a good idea! Using Impact Factors within a given discipline should only be done with great care, as described above. Using impact factor data to compare journals across disciplines is even more problematic. Here are some of the reasons:
  • Disciplines where older literature is still referenced, such as Chemistry and Mathematics, offer challenges to the methodolgy since older citations (older than two years) are not used to calculate the impact factor for a given journal. (Five-year impact factor analysis, which can be calculated using the Journal Citation Index database, helps smooth out this problem only to some degree.)
  • Different disciplines have different practices regarding tendency to cite larger numbers of references. Higher overall citation rates will bump upward impact factor measurements.
  • Where it's common for large numbers of authors to collaborate on a single paper, such as in Physics, the tendency of authors to cite themselves (and in this case, more authors) will result in increased citation rates.

Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor

Pros:

  • A vetted, established metric for measuring journal impact within a discipline.
  • Designed to eliminate bias based on journal size and frequency.
Cons:
  • Individual articles makes an uneven contribution to overall Impact Factor.
  • Impact Factor does not account for certain things, things like context (postive or negative citaion) and intentionality (self-citation).
  • The metric is proprietary to and bound by the contents of the Thomson Reuters database.
  • Citations, on which the Impact Factor is based, count for less than 1% of an article's overall use.

Criticism

Numerous critiques have been made regarding the use of impact factors. A 2007 study noted that the most fundamental flaw is that impact factors present the mean of data that are not normally distributed, and suggested that it would be more appropriate to present the median of these data. There is also a more general debate on the validity of the impact factor as a measure of journal importance and the effect of policies that editors may adopt to boost their impact factor (perhaps to the detriment of readers and writers). Other criticism focuses on the effect of the impact factor on behavior of scholars, editors and other stakeholders. Others have made more general criticisms, arguing that emphasis on impact factor results from negative influence of neoliberal policies on academia claiming that what is needed is not just replacement of the impact factor with more sophisticated metrics for science publications but also discussion on the social value of research assessment and the growing precariousness of scientific careers in higher education.
Experts stress that there are limitations in using impact factors to evaluate a scholar's work. There are many reasons cited for not relying on impact factor alone to evaluate the output of a particular individual. Among these are the following:

  • A single factor is not sufficient for evaluating an author's work.
  • Journal values are meaningless unless compared within the same discipline. Impact factors vary among disciplines.
  • The impact factor was originally devised to show the impact of a specific journal, not a specific scholar. The quality and impact of the author's work may extend beyond the impact of a particular journal.
According to Jim Testa, a researcher for ThomsonReuters Scientific, the most widespread misuse of the Impact Factor is to evaluate the work of an individual author (instead of a journal). "To say that because a researcher is publishing in a certain journal, he or she is more influential or deserves more credit is not necessarily true. There are many other variables to consider." (interview 6/26/2008 in Thomson Reuters blog entry)

Circulation
Journal Profile

About

Circulation publishes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other invited content related to cardiovascular health and disease, including observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services and outcomes studies, and advances in basic and translational research. Circulation is a scientific journal published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins for the American Heart Association. The journal publishes articles related to research in and the practice of cardiovascular diseases, including observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services and outcomes studies, and advances in applied (translational) and basic research. Its 2019 impact factor is 23.603, ranking it first among journals in the Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems category. Articles become open access after a 12-month embargo period.

Highly Cited Keywords

ISSN
0009-7322
ISSN

The ISSN of Circulation is 0009-7322 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

ISSN (Online)
1524-4539
ISSN (Online)

The ISSN (Online) of Circulation is 1524-4539 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

Publisher
Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.
Publisher

Circulation is published by Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd. .

Publication Frequency
Weekly
Publication Frequency

Circulation publishes reports Weekly .

Coverage
1950 - Present
Coverage

The Publication History of Circulation covers 1950 - Present .

Open Access
NO
Open Access

Circulation is Subscription-based (non-OA) Journal. Publishers own the rights to the articles in their journals. Anyone who wants to read the articles should pay by individual or institution to access the articles. Anyone who wants to use the articles in any way must obtain permission from the publishers.

Publication Fee
Publication Fee

There is no publication fee for submiting manuscript to Circulation. Circulation is Subscription-based (non-OA) Journal. Publishers own the rights to the articles in their journals. Anyone who wants to read the articles should pay by individual or institution to access the articles.

Language
English
Language

The language of Circulation is English .

Country/Region
United States
Country/Region

The publisher of Circulation is Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd. , which locates in United States .

Selected Articles

Full Title Authors
Full Title Authors
Use of Intracardiac Echocardiography in Interventional Cardiology: Working With the Anatomy Rather Than Fighting It - 2018 Andres Enriquez · Luis C. Sáenz · Raphael Rosso · Frank E. Silvestry · David J. Callans · Francis E. Marchlinski · Fermin Garcia
Routine Assessment and Promotion of Physical Activity in Healthcare Settings: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association - 2018 Felipe Lobelo · Deborah Rohm Young · Robert E. Sallis · Michael D. Garber · Sandra A. Billinger · John Duperly · Adrian Hutber · Russell R. Pate · Randal J. Thomas · Michael E. Widlansky · Michael V. McConnell · Elizabeth A. Joy
COSCA (Core Outcome Set for Cardiac Arrest) in Adults: An Advisory Statement From the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation - 2018 Kirstie L. Haywood · Laura Whitehead · Vinay Nadkarni · Felix A. Achana · Stefanie G. Beesems · Bernd W. Böttiger · Anne Brooks · Maaret Castrén · Marcus Eng Hock Ong · Mary Fran Hazinski · Rudolph W. Koster · Gisela Lilja · John C. Long · Koenraad G. Monsieurs · Peter Morley · Laurie J. Morrison · Graham Nichol · Valentino Oriolo · Gustavo Saposnik · Michael A. Smyth · Ken Spearpoint · Barry Williams · Gavin D. Perkins
Association Between Early Hyperoxia Exposure After Resuscitation From Cardiac Arrest and Neurological Disability: Prospective Multicenter Protocol-Directed Cohort Study - 2018 Brian W. Roberts · J. Hope Kilgannon · Benton R. Hunter · Michael A. Puskarich · Lisa Pierce · Michael W. Donnino · Marion Leary · Jeffrey A. Kline · Alan E. Jones · Nathan I. Shapiro · Benjamin S. Abella · Stephen Trzeciak
Primary Myocardial Fibrosis as an Alternative Phenotype Pathway of Inherited Cardiac Structural Disorders - 2018 M. Juhani Junttila · Lauri Holmström · Katri Pylkäs · Tuomo Mantere · Kari S. Kaikkonen · Katja Porvari · Marja-Leena Kortelainen · Lasse Pakanen · Risto Kerkelä · Robert J. Myerburg · Heikki V. Huikuri
Response to Letter Regarding Article, “Aortic Wall Inflammation Predicts Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Expansion, Rupture, and Need for Surgical Repair” - 2018 Rachael Forsythe · Maaz Syed · David E. Newby
Leadless Pacemaker and Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Combination in a Hemodialysis Patient - 2018 Yoshinari Enomoto · Hikari Hashimoto · Rina Ishii · Shunsuke Torii · Keijiro Nakamura · Mahito Noro · Kaoru Sugi · Masao Moroi · Masato Nakamura
Clinical Presentation and Outcome in a Contemporary Cohort of Patients with Acute Myocarditis: The Multicenter Lombardy Registry - 2018 Enrico Ammirati · Manlio Cipriani · Claudio Moro · Claudia Raineri · Daniela Pini · Paola Sormani · Riccardo Mantovani · Marisa Varrenti · Patrizia Pedrotti · Cristina Conca · Antonio Mafrici · Aurelia Grosu · Daniele Briguglia · Silvia Guglielmetto · Giovanni B. Perego · Stefania Colombo · Salvatore Ivan Caico · Cristina Giannattasio · Alberto Maestroni · Valentina Carubelli · Marco Metra · Carlo Lombardi · Jeness Campodonico · Piergiuseppe Agostoni · Giovanni Peretto · Laura Scelsi · Annalisa Turco · Giuseppe Di Tano · Carlo Campana · Armando Belloni
Relationship Between Cotinine-Verified Smoking Status and Incidence of Hypertension in 74,743 Korean Adults - 2018 Byung Jin Kim · Dae Chul Seo · Bum Soo Kim · Jin Ho Kang
Fixation or Disinfection - 2018 Takashi Kunihara
Hypogonadism as a Reversible Cause of Torsades de Pointes in Men - 2018 Joe-Elie Salem · Xavier Waintraub · Carine Courtillot · Christian M. Shaffer · Estelle Gandjbakhch · Carole Maupain · Javid Moslehi · Fabio Badilini · Julien Haroche · Paul Gougis · Véronique Fressart · Andrew M. Glazer · Françoise Hidden-Lucet · Philippe Touraine · B. Lebrun-Vignes · Dan M. Roden · Anne Bachelot · Christian Funck-Brentano
Endothelial C-Type Natriuretic Peptide Acts on Pericytes to Regulate Microcirculatory Flow and Blood Pressure - 2018 Katarina Spiranec · Wen Chen · Franziska Werner · Viacheslav O. Nikolaev · Takashi Naruke · Franziska Koch · Andrea Werner · Petra Eder-Negrin · Rodrigo Diéguez-Hurtado · Ralf H. Adams · Hideo Baba · Hannes Schmidt · Kai Schuh · Boris V. Skryabin · Kiavash Movahedi · Frank Schweda · Michaela Kuhn
High-Dose Versus Low-Dose Pitavastatin in Japanese Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease (REAL-CAD): A Randomized Superiority Trial - 2018 Isao Taguchi · Satoshi Iimuro · Hiroshi Iwata · Hiroaki Takashima · Mitsuru Abe · Eisuke Amiya · Takanori Ogawa · Yukio Ozaki · Ichiro Sakuma · Yoshihisa Nakagawa · Kiyoshi Hibi · Takafumi Hiro · Yoshihiro Fukumoto · Seiji Hokimoto · Katsumi Miyauchi · Tsutomu Yamazaki · Hiroshi Ito · Yutaka Otsuji · Kazuo Kimura · Jun Takahashi · Hiroyoshi Yokoi · Kazuo Kitagawa · Takao Urabe · Yasushi Okada · Yasuo Terayama · Kazunori Toyoda · Takehiko Nagao · Masayasu Matsumoto · Yasuo Ohashi · Tetsuji Kaneko
Arrhythmogenic Delayed Afterdepolarizations Are Promoted by Severe Hypothermia But Not Therapeutic Hypothermia - 2018 Hidehira Fukaya · Joseph S. Piktel · Xiaoping Wan · Bradley N. Plummer · Kenneth R. Laurita · Lance D. Wilson
Best Treatment Strategies With Statins to Maximize the Cardiometabolic Benefits - 2018 Kyoung Im Cho · Ichiro Sakuma · Il Suk Sohn · Toshio Hayashi · Kazunori Shimada · Kwang Kon Koh
How Do Resuscitation Teams at Top-Performing Hospitals for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Succeed?: A Qualitative Study - 2018 Brahmajee K. Nallamothu · Timothy C. Guetterman · Molly Harrod · Joan Kellenberg · Jessica Lehrich · Steven L. Kronick · Sarah L. Krein · Theodore J. Iwashyna · Sanjay Saint · Paul S. Chan
Newer Generation Ultra-Thin Strut Drug-Eluting Stents versus Older Second-Generation Thicker Strut Drug-Eluting Stents for Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials - 2018 Sripal Bangalore · Bora Toklu · Neil Patel · Frederick Feit · Gregg W. Stone
Intravascular Ultrasound-Derived Virtual Fractional Flow Reserve for the Assessment of Myocardial Ischemia - 2018 Fumiyasu Seike · Teruyoshi Uetani · Kazuhisa Nishimura · Hiroshi Kawakami · Haruhiko Higashi · Akira Fujii · Jun Aono · Takayuki Nagai · Katsuji Inoue · Jun Suzuki · Shinji Inaba · Takafumi Okura · Kazunori Yasuda · Jitsuo Higaki · Shuntaro Ikeda