Last updated on

BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care
Latest Impact Factor IF - Analysis · Trend · Prediction · Ranking


User Feedback

Journal Impact IF

2020-2021

3.206

-9.2 %

Journal Impact IF Trend

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Researchain
One-click to visualize your research performance

Popular Journals

Highly Cited Articles

BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care

High Impact Research Articles
Publication Title Author Listing
Publication Title Author Listing
· · ·
· · · · ·
· · · · · ·
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
· · · ·
· · · · · ·
· · · · · · ·
· · ·
· · ·
· · · ·
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
· · · · ·
·
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · ·
· · · · · ·
· · · · ·
· · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · ·
· · · · · · ·
· · ·
· · · · ·
·
· · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · · ·
· · · · ·
· · · · ·
· · ·
· · · ·
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · ·
· · · · · · ·
· ·
· · · · · ·
· · · · · · · · ·
· · · · ·
· · · · · ·
· · · · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · · ·
· ·
· · · · · ·
· · · · ·
· · · · · · ·
· · · · · · · · · · ·
· · ·

Highly Cited Keywords

BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care

High Impact Research Keywords

Journal Impact IF Ranking

BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care

Journal Impact IF Ranking
Subcategory Quartile Rank Percentile
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Q3 121/219

Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 44%

Journal Impact IF Ranking

· In the Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism research field, the Quartile of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care is Q3. BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care has been ranked #121 over 219 related journals in the Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism research category. The ranking percentile of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care is around 44% in the field of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism.

Related Journals

BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care

Similar Journals

BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care

The 2020-2021 Journal Impact IF of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care is 3.206, which is just updated in 2021.

BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care Impact Factor
Highest IF
3.53
Highest Journal Impact IF

The highest Journal Impact IF of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care is 3.53.

Lowest IF
2.143
Lowest Journal Impact IF

The lowest Journal Impact IF of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care is 2.143.

Total Growth Rate
49.6%
IF Total Growth Rate

The total growth rate of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care IF is 49.6%.

Annual Growth Rate
9.9%
IF Annual Growth Rate

The annual growth rate of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care IF is 9.9%.

Journal Impact IF History

BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care

Journal Impact IF Trend

Year Journal Impact IF
Year Journal Impact IF
2021-2022 Check our Real-Time Impact Factor and Impact Factor Prediction Results
2020-2021 3.206
2019-2020 3.53
2018-2019 3.26
2017-2018 2.598
2016-2017 2.143
2015-2016 -
2014-2015 -
2013-2014 -
2012-2013 -
2011-2012 -
Journal Impact IF History

· The 2020-2021 Journal Impact IF of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care is 3.206
· The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care is 3.53
· The 2018-2019 Journal Impact IF of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care is 3.26
· The 2017-2018 Journal Impact IF of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care is 2.598
· The 2016-2017 Journal Impact IF of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care is 2.143
The Journal Impact IF 2015-2016 of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care is still under analysis. Stay Tuned!
The Journal Impact IF 2014-2015 of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care is still under analysis. Stay Tuned!
The Journal Impact IF 2013-2014 of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care is still under analysis. Stay Tuned!
The Journal Impact IF 2012-2013 of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care is still under analysis. Stay Tuned!
The Journal Impact IF 2011-2012 of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care is still under analysis. Stay Tuned!

BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care

Journal Key Metrics
Journal Title BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care
ISSN -
ISSN (Online) 2052-4897
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
Publication Frequency
-
Coverage
2015 - Present
Open Access
YES
Language
English
Highest Impact Factor (2011 - 2021) 3.53
Lowest Impact Factor (2011 - 2021) 2.143
Total Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2011 - 2021) 49.6%
Avarage Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2011 - 2021) 9.9%
Annual Impact Factor IF Growth Rate (2020 - 2021) -9.2 %
Publication Fee
Homepage
Submit Manuscript

BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care

Impact Factor 2021-2022 Prediction
BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care Impact Factor Predition System

BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care Impact Factor Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community.

Predict Check All Preditions

What is Impact Factor?

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly average number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factor values are often deemed to be more important, or carry more intrinsic prestige in their respective fields, than those with lower values.

BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones. According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.” Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. The Impact Factor of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. It is frequently used as a Metric for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher Impact Factor are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care Impact Factor IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2020) by papers published in the BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care during the two preceding years (2018-2019). Note that 2020 Impact Factor are reported in 2021; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2020 publications have been processed by the indexing agency. New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1, are known zero values. Journals that are indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have been indexed for three years. Occasionally, Journal Citation Reports assigns an impact factor to new journals with less than two years of indexing, based on partial citation data. The calculation always uses two complete and known years of item counts, but for new titles one of the known counts is zero. Annuals and other irregular publications sometimes publish no items in a particular year, affecting the count. The impact factor relates to a specific time period; it is possible to calculate it for any desired period. In addition to the 2-year Impact Factor, the 3-year Impact Factor, 4-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Real-Time Impact Factor can provide further insights and factors into the impact of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care.

History

The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Impact factors are calculated yearly starting from 1975 for journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). ISI was acquired by Thomson Scientific & Healthcare in 1992, and became known as Thomson ISI. In 2018, Thomson ISI was sold to Onex Corporation and Baring Private Equity Asia. They founded a new corporation, Clarivate, which is now the publisher of the JCR.

Use

The impact factor is used to compare different journals within a certain field. The Web of Science indexes more than 11,500 science and social science journals. Journal impact factors are often used to evaluate the merit of individual articles and individual researchers. This use of impact factors was summarised by Hoeffel:

Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation. Experience has shown that in each specialty the best journals are those in which it is most difficult to have an article accepted, and these are the journals that have a high impact factor. Most of these journals existed long before the impact factor was devised. The use of impact factor as a measure of quality is widespread because it fits well with the opinion we have in each field of the best journals in our specialty....In conclusion, prestigious journals publish papers of high level. Therefore, their impact factor is high, and not the contrary.

Eugene Garfield

In brief, Impact factors may be used by:
  • Authors to decide where to submit an article for publication.
  • Libraries to make collection development decisions
  • Academic departments to assess academic productivity
  • Academic departments to make decisions on promotion and tenure.
As impact factors are a journal-level metric, rather than an article- or individual-level metric, this use is controversial. Garfield agrees with Hoeffel,but warns about the "misuse in evaluating individuals" because there is "a wide variation [of citations] from article to article within a single journal". Other things to consider about Impact Factors:
  • Many journals do not have an impact factor.
  • The impact factor cannot assess the quality of individual articles. Even if citations were evenly distributed among articles, the impact factor would only measure the interests of other researchers in an article, not its importance and usefulness.
  • Only research articles, technical notes and reviews are “citable” items. Editorials, letters, news items and meeting abstracts are “non-citable items”.
  • Only a small percentage of articles are highly cited and they are found in a small subset of journals. This small proportion accounts for a large percentage of citations.
  • Controversial papers, such as those based on fraudulent data, may be highly cited, distorting the impact factor of a journal.
  • Citation bias may exist. For example, English language resources may be favoured. Authors may cite their own work.
Moreover, informed and careful use of these impact data is essential, and should be based on a thorough understanding of the methodology used to generate impact factors. There are controversial aspects of using impact factors:
  • It is not clear whether the number of times a paper is cited measures its actual quality.
  • Some databases that calculate impact factors fail to incorporate publications including textbooks, handbooks and reference books.
  • Certain disciplines have low numbers of journals and usage. Therefore, one should only compare journals or researchers within the same discipline.
  • Review articles normally are cited more often and therefore can skew results.
  • Self-citing may also skew results.
  • Some resources used to calculate impact factors have inadequate international coverage.
  • Editorial policies can artificially inflate an impact factor.
Impact factors have often been used in advancement and tenure decision-making. Many recognize that this is a coarse tool for such important decisions, and that a multitude of factors should be taken into account in these deliberations. When considering the use of the impact factor (IF), keep these aspects in mind:
  • IF analysis is limited to citations from the journals indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge. Currently, the Web of Science indexes only 8621 journals across the full breadth of the sciences, and just 3121 in the social sciences.
  • A high IF/citation rate says nothing about the quality -- or even, validity -- of the references being cited. Notorious or even retracted articles often attract a lot of attention, hence a high number of citations. The notority related to the first publication on "cold fusion" is one such example.
  • Journals that publish more "review articles" are often found near the top of the rankings. While not known for publishing new, creative findings, these individual articles tend to be heavily cited.
  • The IF measures the average number of citations to articles in the journal -- given this, a small number of highly-cited articles will skew the figure.
  • It takes several years for new journals to be added to the list of titles indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge, so these newer titles will be under-represented.
  • It's alleged that journal editors have learned to "game" the system, encouraging authors to cite their works previously published in the same journal.
Comparing Journals Across Disciplines? Not a good idea! Using Impact Factors within a given discipline should only be done with great care, as described above. Using impact factor data to compare journals across disciplines is even more problematic. Here are some of the reasons:
  • Disciplines where older literature is still referenced, such as Chemistry and Mathematics, offer challenges to the methodolgy since older citations (older than two years) are not used to calculate the impact factor for a given journal. (Five-year impact factor analysis, which can be calculated using the Journal Citation Index database, helps smooth out this problem only to some degree.)
  • Different disciplines have different practices regarding tendency to cite larger numbers of references. Higher overall citation rates will bump upward impact factor measurements.
  • Where it's common for large numbers of authors to collaborate on a single paper, such as in Physics, the tendency of authors to cite themselves (and in this case, more authors) will result in increased citation rates.

Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor

Pros:

  • A vetted, established metric for measuring journal impact within a discipline.
  • Designed to eliminate bias based on journal size and frequency.
Cons:
  • Individual articles makes an uneven contribution to overall Impact Factor.
  • Impact Factor does not account for certain things, things like context (postive or negative citaion) and intentionality (self-citation).
  • The metric is proprietary to and bound by the contents of the Thomson Reuters database.
  • Citations, on which the Impact Factor is based, count for less than 1% of an article's overall use.

Criticism

Numerous critiques have been made regarding the use of impact factors. A 2007 study noted that the most fundamental flaw is that impact factors present the mean of data that are not normally distributed, and suggested that it would be more appropriate to present the median of these data. There is also a more general debate on the validity of the impact factor as a measure of journal importance and the effect of policies that editors may adopt to boost their impact factor (perhaps to the detriment of readers and writers). Other criticism focuses on the effect of the impact factor on behavior of scholars, editors and other stakeholders. Others have made more general criticisms, arguing that emphasis on impact factor results from negative influence of neoliberal policies on academia claiming that what is needed is not just replacement of the impact factor with more sophisticated metrics for science publications but also discussion on the social value of research assessment and the growing precariousness of scientific careers in higher education.
Experts stress that there are limitations in using impact factors to evaluate a scholar's work. There are many reasons cited for not relying on impact factor alone to evaluate the output of a particular individual. Among these are the following:

  • A single factor is not sufficient for evaluating an author's work.
  • Journal values are meaningless unless compared within the same discipline. Impact factors vary among disciplines.
  • The impact factor was originally devised to show the impact of a specific journal, not a specific scholar. The quality and impact of the author's work may extend beyond the impact of a particular journal.
According to Jim Testa, a researcher for ThomsonReuters Scientific, the most widespread misuse of the Impact Factor is to evaluate the work of an individual author (instead of a journal). "To say that because a researcher is publishing in a certain journal, he or she is more influential or deserves more credit is not necessarily true. There are many other variables to consider." (interview 6/26/2008 in Thomson Reuters blog entry)

BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care
Journal Profile

About

BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care is an open access journal committed to publishing high-quality basic and clinical research articles regarding type 1 and type 2 diabetes and associated complications. Only original research and systematic reviews are accepted. Submissions are subject to rigorous external peer review to ensure the publication of high-quality information. The online-only format allows for continuous updates and serves as an invaluable resource to the multidisciplinary community of endocrinology, public health/prevention and internal medicine. A rapid review process will also ensure that timely, up-to-date research is available internationally. BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care is published by BMJ in partnership with the American Diabetes Association. None

ISSN
-
ISSN

The ISSN of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care is - . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

ISSN (Online)
2052-4897
ISSN (Online)

The ISSN (Online) of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care is 2052-4897 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
Publisher

BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care is published by BMJ Publishing Group .

Publication Frequency
-
Publication Frequency

BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care publishes reports - .

Coverage
2015 - Present
Coverage

The Publication History of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care covers 2015 - Present .

Open Access
YES
Open Access

Publication Fee
Publication Fee

Language
English
Language

The language of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care is English .

Country/Region
United Kingdom
Country/Region

The publisher of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care is BMJ Publishing Group , which locates in United Kingdom .

International Collaboration Trend

BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care

Cited Documents Trend

BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care

Total Publications
840
Total Citations
6358

Annual Publication Volume

BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care

Annual Citation Record

BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care

Publications Cites Dataset

BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care

Year Publications Citations
Year Publications Citations
2013 1 1
2014 31 11
2015 62 150
2016 95 352
2017 88 749
2018 64 1009
2019 100 1392
2020 386 2495
2021 13 199
Publications Cites Dataset

· The BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care has published 1 reports and received 1 citations in 2013.
· The BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care has published 31 reports and received 11 citations in 2014.
· The BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care has published 62 reports and received 150 citations in 2015.
· The BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care has published 95 reports and received 352 citations in 2016.
· The BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care has published 88 reports and received 749 citations in 2017.
· The BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care has published 64 reports and received 1009 citations in 2018.
· The BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care has published 100 reports and received 1392 citations in 2019.
· The BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care has published 386 reports and received 2495 citations in 2020.
· The BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care has published 13 reports and received 199 citations in 2021.
· The total publications of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care is 840.
· The total citations of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care is 6358.

Share Your Impact Factor Information with Community

Do you know the Latest Impact Factor of BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care? Share with the community!

Impact Factor

What is the Latest Impact Factor?

Data Source

Where do you get the information?



Impact Factor Data Source
Impact Factor Data Source
1.347 Wikipedia

Thanks for sharing your information with us!