Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Journal Impact IF - Analysis · Trend · Prediction · Ranking


New

Journal Impact IF

2019-2020

3.088

6.6%

Journal Impact IF Trend

Related Journals

Popular Journals

Addiction Science & Clinical Practice

The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is 3.088, which is just updated in 2020.

Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Impact Factor
Highest IF
3.088
Highest Journal Impact IF

The highest Journal Impact IF of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is 3.088.

Lowest IF
1.0
Lowest Journal Impact IF

The lowest Journal Impact IF of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is 1.0.

Total Growth Rate
208.8%
IF Total Growth Rate

The total growth rate of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice IF is 208.8%.

Annual Growth Rate
23.2%
IF Annual Growth Rate

The annual growth rate of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice IF is 23.2%.

Journal Impact IF Ranking

Subcategory Quartile Rank Percentile
Clinical Psychology Q1 63/275

Clinical Psychology 77%

Psychiatry and Mental Health Q2 152/506

Psychiatry and Mental Health 70%

Journal Impact IF Ranking

· In the Clinical Psychology research field, the Quartile of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is Q1. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice has been ranked #63 over 275 related journals in the Clinical Psychology research category. The ranking percentile of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is around 77% in the field of Clinical Psychology.
· In the Psychiatry and Mental Health research field, the Quartile of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is Q2. Addiction Science & Clinical Practice has been ranked #152 over 506 related journals in the Psychiatry and Mental Health research category. The ranking percentile of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is around 70% in the field of Psychiatry and Mental Health.

Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Impact Factor 2020-2021 Prediction

Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Impact Factor Predition System

Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Impact Factor Prediction System is now online. You can start share your valuable insights with the community.

Predict Check All Preditions
Total Publications
627
Total Citations
6015

Annual Publication Volume

Annual Citation Record

International Collaboration Trend

Cited Documents Trend

Journal Impact IF History

Year Journal Impact IF
Year Journal Impact IF
2019-2020 3.088
2018-2019 2.896
2017-2018 3.048
2016-2017 2.851
2015-2016 2.386
2014-2015 2.417
2013-2014 2.303
2012-2013 2.2
2011-2012 1.0
Journal Impact IF History

· The 2019-2020 Journal Impact IF of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is 3.088
· The 2018-2019 Journal Impact IF of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is 2.896
· The 2017-2018 Journal Impact IF of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is 3.048
· The 2016-2017 Journal Impact IF of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is 2.851
· The 2015-2016 Journal Impact IF of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is 2.386
· The 2014-2015 Journal Impact IF of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is 2.417
· The 2013-2014 Journal Impact IF of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is 2.303
· The 2012-2013 Journal Impact IF of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is 2.2
· The 2011-2012 Journal Impact IF of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is 1.0

Publications Cites Dataset

Year Publications Citations
Year Publications Citations
2007 9 2
2008 7 11
2009 7 44
2010 10 72
2011 11 69
2012 127 143
2013 110 285
2014 20 422
2015 164 594
2016 17 717
2017 39 804
2018 26 791
2019 46 835
2020 30 1135
2021 4 91
Publications Cites Dataset

· The Addiction Science & Clinical Practice has published 9 reports and received 2 citations in 2007.
· The Addiction Science & Clinical Practice has published 7 reports and received 11 citations in 2008.
· The Addiction Science & Clinical Practice has published 7 reports and received 44 citations in 2009.
· The Addiction Science & Clinical Practice has published 10 reports and received 72 citations in 2010.
· The Addiction Science & Clinical Practice has published 11 reports and received 69 citations in 2011.
· The Addiction Science & Clinical Practice has published 127 reports and received 143 citations in 2012.
· The Addiction Science & Clinical Practice has published 110 reports and received 285 citations in 2013.
· The Addiction Science & Clinical Practice has published 20 reports and received 422 citations in 2014.
· The Addiction Science & Clinical Practice has published 164 reports and received 594 citations in 2015.
· The Addiction Science & Clinical Practice has published 17 reports and received 717 citations in 2016.
· The Addiction Science & Clinical Practice has published 39 reports and received 804 citations in 2017.
· The Addiction Science & Clinical Practice has published 26 reports and received 791 citations in 2018.
· The Addiction Science & Clinical Practice has published 46 reports and received 835 citations in 2019.
· The Addiction Science & Clinical Practice has published 30 reports and received 1135 citations in 2020.
· The Addiction Science & Clinical Practice has published 4 reports and received 91 citations in 2021.
· The total publications of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is 627.
· The total citations of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is 6015.

What is Impact Factor?

The impact factor (IF) or journal impact factor (JIF) of an academic journal is a scientometric index calculated by Clarivate that reflects the yearly average number of citations of articles published in the last two years in a given journal. It is frequently used as a proxy for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher impact factor values are often deemed to be more important, or carry more intrinsic prestige in their respective fields, than those with lower values.

Addiction Science & Clinical Practice | Academic Accelerator - About the Impact Factor

Impact factor is commonly used to evaluate the relative importance of a journal within its field and to measure the frequency with which the “average article” in a journal has been cited in a particular time period. Journal which publishes more review articles will get highest IFs. Journals with higher IFs believed to be more important than those with lower ones. According to Eugene Garfield “impact simply reflects the ability of the journals and editors to attract the best paper available.” Journal which publishes more review articles will get maximum IFs. The Impact Factor of an academic journal is a scientometric Metric that reflects the yearly average number of citations that recent articles published in a given journal received. It is frequently used as a Metric for the relative importance of a journal within its field; journals with higher Impact Factor are often deemed to be more important than those with lower ones. The Addiction Science & Clinical Practice Impact Factor IF measures the average number of citations received in a particular year (2020) by papers published in the Addiction Science & Clinical Practice during the two preceding years (2018-2019). Note that 2020 Impact Factor are reported in 2021; they cannot be calculated until all of the 2020 publications have been processed by the indexing agency. New journals, which are indexed from their first published issue, will receive an impact factor after two years of indexing; in this case, the citations to the year prior to Volume 1, and the number of articles published in the year prior to Volume 1, are known zero values. Journals that are indexed starting with a volume other than the first volume will not get an impact factor until they have been indexed for three years. Occasionally, Journal Citation Reports assigns an impact factor to new journals with less than two years of indexing, based on partial citation data. The calculation always uses two complete and known years of item counts, but for new titles one of the known counts is zero. Annuals and other irregular publications sometimes publish no items in a particular year, affecting the count. The impact factor relates to a specific time period; it is possible to calculate it for any desired period. In addition to the 2-year Impact Factor, the 3-year Impact Factor, 4-year Impact Factor, 5-year Impact Factor, Real-Time Impact Factor can provide further insights and factors into the impact of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice.

History

The impact factor was devised by Eugene Garfield, the founder of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Impact factors are calculated yearly starting from 1975 for journals listed in the Journal Citation Reports (JCR). ISI was acquired by Thomson Scientific & Healthcare in 1992, and became known as Thomson ISI. In 2018, Thomson ISI was sold to Onex Corporation and Baring Private Equity Asia. They founded a new corporation, Clarivate, which is now the publisher of the JCR.

Use

The impact factor is used to compare different journals within a certain field. The Web of Science indexes more than 11,500 science and social science journals. Journal impact factors are often used to evaluate the merit of individual articles and individual researchers. This use of impact factors was summarised by Hoeffel:

Impact Factor is not a perfect tool to measure the quality of articles but there is nothing better and it has the advantage of already being in existence and is, therefore, a good technique for scientific evaluation. Experience has shown that in each specialty the best journals are those in which it is most difficult to have an article accepted, and these are the journals that have a high impact factor. Most of these journals existed long before the impact factor was devised. The use of impact factor as a measure of quality is widespread because it fits well with the opinion we have in each field of the best journals in our specialty....In conclusion, prestigious journals publish papers of high level. Therefore, their impact factor is high, and not the contrary.

Eugene Garfield

In brief, Impact factors may be used by:
  • Authors to decide where to submit an article for publication.
  • Libraries to make collection development decisions
  • Academic departments to assess academic productivity
  • Academic departments to make decisions on promotion and tenure.
As impact factors are a journal-level metric, rather than an article- or individual-level metric, this use is controversial. Garfield agrees with Hoeffel,but warns about the "misuse in evaluating individuals" because there is "a wide variation [of citations] from article to article within a single journal". Other things to consider about Impact Factors:
  • Many journals do not have an impact factor.
  • The impact factor cannot assess the quality of individual articles. Even if citations were evenly distributed among articles, the impact factor would only measure the interests of other researchers in an article, not its importance and usefulness.
  • Only research articles, technical notes and reviews are “citable” items. Editorials, letters, news items and meeting abstracts are “non-citable items”.
  • Only a small percentage of articles are highly cited and they are found in a small subset of journals. This small proportion accounts for a large percentage of citations.
  • Controversial papers, such as those based on fraudulent data, may be highly cited, distorting the impact factor of a journal.
  • Citation bias may exist. For example, English language resources may be favoured. Authors may cite their own work.
Moreover, informed and careful use of these impact data is essential, and should be based on a thorough understanding of the methodology used to generate impact factors. There are controversial aspects of using impact factors:
  • It is not clear whether the number of times a paper is cited measures its actual quality.
  • Some databases that calculate impact factors fail to incorporate publications including textbooks, handbooks and reference books.
  • Certain disciplines have low numbers of journals and usage. Therefore, one should only compare journals or researchers within the same discipline.
  • Review articles normally are cited more often and therefore can skew results.
  • Self-citing may also skew results.
  • Some resources used to calculate impact factors have inadequate international coverage.
  • Editorial policies can artificially inflate an impact factor.
Impact factors have often been used in advancement and tenure decision-making. Many recognize that this is a coarse tool for such important decisions, and that a multitude of factors should be taken into account in these deliberations. When considering the use of the impact factor (IF), keep these aspects in mind:
  • IF analysis is limited to citations from the journals indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge. Currently, the Web of Science indexes only 8621 journals across the full breadth of the sciences, and just 3121 in the social sciences.
  • A high IF/citation rate says nothing about the quality -- or even, validity -- of the references being cited. Notorious or even retracted articles often attract a lot of attention, hence a high number of citations. The notority related to the first publication on "cold fusion" is one such example.
  • Journals that publish more "review articles" are often found near the top of the rankings. While not known for publishing new, creative findings, these individual articles tend to be heavily cited.
  • The IF measures the average number of citations to articles in the journal -- given this, a small number of highly-cited articles will skew the figure.
  • It takes several years for new journals to be added to the list of titles indexed by the Web of Science/Web of Knowledge, so these newer titles will be under-represented.
  • It's alleged that journal editors have learned to "game" the system, encouraging authors to cite their works previously published in the same journal.
Comparing Journals Across Disciplines? Not a good idea! Using Impact Factors within a given discipline should only be done with great care, as described above. Using impact factor data to compare journals across disciplines is even more problematic. Here are some of the reasons:
  • Disciplines where older literature is still referenced, such as Chemistry and Mathematics, offer challenges to the methodolgy since older citations (older than two years) are not used to calculate the impact factor for a given journal. (Five-year impact factor analysis, which can be calculated using the Journal Citation Index database, helps smooth out this problem only to some degree.)
  • Different disciplines have different practices regarding tendency to cite larger numbers of references. Higher overall citation rates will bump upward impact factor measurements.
  • Where it's common for large numbers of authors to collaborate on a single paper, such as in Physics, the tendency of authors to cite themselves (and in this case, more authors) will result in increased citation rates.

Pros and Cons of the Impact Factor

Pros:

  • A vetted, established metric for measuring journal impact within a discipline.
  • Designed to eliminate bias based on journal size and frequency.
Cons:
  • Individual articles makes an uneven contribution to overall Impact Factor.
  • Impact Factor does not account for certain things, things like context (postive or negative citaion) and intentionality (self-citation).
  • The metric is proprietary to and bound by the contents of the Thomson Reuters database.
  • Citations, on which the Impact Factor is based, count for less than 1% of an article's overall use.

Criticism

Numerous critiques have been made regarding the use of impact factors. A 2007 study noted that the most fundamental flaw is that impact factors present the mean of data that are not normally distributed, and suggested that it would be more appropriate to present the median of these data. There is also a more general debate on the validity of the impact factor as a measure of journal importance and the effect of policies that editors may adopt to boost their impact factor (perhaps to the detriment of readers and writers). Other criticism focuses on the effect of the impact factor on behavior of scholars, editors and other stakeholders. Others have made more general criticisms, arguing that emphasis on impact factor results from negative influence of neoliberal policies on academia claiming that what is needed is not just replacement of the impact factor with more sophisticated metrics for science publications but also discussion on the social value of research assessment and the growing precariousness of scientific careers in higher education.
Experts stress that there are limitations in using impact factors to evaluate a scholar's work. There are many reasons cited for not relying on impact factor alone to evaluate the output of a particular individual. Among these are the following:

  • A single factor is not sufficient for evaluating an author's work.
  • Journal values are meaningless unless compared within the same discipline. Impact factors vary among disciplines.
  • The impact factor was originally devised to show the impact of a specific journal, not a specific scholar. The quality and impact of the author's work may extend beyond the impact of a particular journal.
According to Jim Testa, a researcher for ThomsonReuters Scientific, the most widespread misuse of the Impact Factor is to evaluate the work of an individual author (instead of a journal). "To say that because a researcher is publishing in a certain journal, he or she is more influential or deserves more credit is not necessarily true. There are many other variables to consider." (interview 6/26/2008 in Thomson Reuters blog entry)

Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
Journal Profile

About

Addiction Science & Clinical Practice provides a forum for clinically relevant research and perspectives that contribute to improving the quality of care for people with unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, or other drug use and addictive behaviours across a spectrum of clinical settings.Addiction Science & Clinical Practice accepts articles of clinical relevance related to the prevention and treatment of unhealthy alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use across the spectrum of clinical settings. Topics of interest address issues related to the following: the spectrum of unhealthy use of alcohol, tobacco, and other drugs among the range of affected persons (e.g., not limited by age, race/ethnicity, gender, or sexual orientation); the array of clinical prevention and treatment practices (from health messages, to identification and early intervention, to more extensive interventions including counseling and pharmacotherapy and other management strategies); and identification and management of medical, psychiatric, social, and other health consequences of substance use. None

Highly Cited Keywords

ISSN
1940-0632
ISSN

The ISSN of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is 1940-0632 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

ISSN (Online)
1940-0640
ISSN (Online)

The ISSN (Online) of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is 1940-0640 . An ISSN is an 8-digit code used to identify newspapers, journals, magazines and periodicals of all kinds and on all media–print and electronic.

Publisher
BioMed Central Ltd.
Publisher

Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is published by BioMed Central Ltd. .

Publication Frequency
Semiannual
Publication Frequency

Addiction Science & Clinical Practice publishes reports Semiannual .

Coverage
2007 - Present
Coverage

The Publication History of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice covers 2007 - Present .

Open Access
YES
Open Access

Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is an Open Access (OA) Journal. Open Access stands for unrestricted access and unrestricted reuse. With Open Access, researchers can read and build on the findings of others without restriction. Much scientific and medical research is paid for with public funds. Open Access allows taxpayers to see the results of their investment.

Publication Fee
Publication Fee

Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is an Open Access (OA) Journal. Open Access stands for unrestricted access and unrestricted reuse. With Open Access, researchers can read and build on the findings of others without restriction. Open Access allows taxpayers to see the results of their investment. Please share or review the publication fee with the community.

Language
English
Language

The language of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is English .

Country/Region
United Kingdom
Country/Region

The publisher of Addiction Science & Clinical Practice is BioMed Central Ltd. , which locates in United Kingdom .

Selected Articles

Full Title Authors
Full Title Authors
MySafeRx: a mobile technology platform integrating motivational coaching, adherence monitoring, and electronic pill dispensing for enhancing buprenorphine/naloxone adherence during opioid use disorder treatment: a pilot study Zev Schuman-Olivier · Zev Schuman-Olivier · Zev Schuman-Olivier · Jacob T. Borodovsky · Jackson Steinkamp · Jackson Steinkamp · Qays Munir · Qays Munir · Kyle Butler · Mary Ann Greene · Jonah Goldblatt · Jonah Goldblatt · Hai Yi Xie · Lisa A. Marsch · Lisa A. Marsch
Eligibility for heroin-assisted treatment (HAT) among people who inject opioids and are living with HIV in a Canadian setting Jan Klimas · Jan Klimas · Jan Klimas · Huiru Dong · Nadia Fairbairn · Nadia Fairbairn · Eugenia Socías · Eugenia Socías · Rolando Barrios · Evan Wood · Evan Wood · Thomas Kerr · Thomas Kerr · Julio S. G. Montaner · Julio S. G. Montaner · M.-J. Milloy · M.-J. Milloy · M.-J. Milloy
Adherence intervention for HIV-infected persons who use drugs: adaptation, open trial, and pilot randomized hybrid type 1 trial protocol Kasey Claborn · Kasey Claborn · Sara J. Becker · Don Operario · Steve Safren · Josiah D. Rich · Josiah D. Rich · Susan E. Ramsey · Susan E. Ramsey
Development and differentiability of three brief interventions for risky alcohol use that include varying doses of motivational interviewing Jennifer E. Hettema · Stephanie Cockrell · Abigail Reeves · Karen S. Ingersoll · Paula J. Lum · Richard Saitz · Cristina Murray-Krezan · Valerie A. Carrejo · Valerie A. Carrejo
Evaluation of the effect of methamphetamine on traumatic injury complications and outcomes Michael M. Neeki · Michael M. Neeki · Fanglong Dong · Lidia Liang · Jake Toy · Braeden Carrico · Nina Jabourian · Arnold Sin · Arnold Sin · Farabi Hussain · Farabi Hussain · Sharon Brown · Keyvan Safdari · Keyvan Safdari · Rodney Borger · Rodney Borger · David Wong · David Wong · David Wong
Barriers and facilitators affecting the implementation of substance use screening in primary care clinics: a qualitative study of patients, providers, and staff Jennifer McNeely · Pritika C. Kumar · Traci Rieckmann · Erica Sedlander · Sarah Farkas · Christine Chollak · Joseph Kannry · Aida Vega · Eva Waite · Lauren Peccoralo · Richard N. Rosenthal · Dennis McCarty · John Rotrosen · John Rotrosen
Under one roof: identification, evaluation, and treatment of chronic hepatitis C in addiction care Stephen A. Martin · Stephen A. Martin · Jordon D. Bosse · Amanda Wilson · Phyllis T. Losikoff · Lisa M. Chiodo · Lisa M. Chiodo · Lisa M. Chiodo
Substance use and the HIV care continuum: important advances P. Todd Korthuis · E. Jennifer Edelman · E. Jennifer Edelman
Mindfulness-based treatment of addiction: current state of the field and envisioning the next wave of research Eric L. Garland · Matthew O. Howard · Matthew O. Howard
Stigma associated with medication treatment for young adults with opioid use disorder: a case series Scott E. Hadland · Tae Woo Park · Sarah M. Bagley · Sarah M. Bagley
Standardised alcohol screening in primary health care services targeting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Australia M. Mofizul Islam · Helen T. Oni · K. S. Kylie Lee · Scott Wilson · Kristie Harrison · Beth Hummerston · Rowena Ivers · Katherine M. Conigrave · Katherine M. Conigrave · Katherine M. Conigrave
Substance use patterns and in-hospital care of adolescents and young adults attending music concerts Stephanie Ruest · Alexander M. Stephan · Peter T. Masiakos · Paul D. Biddinger · Carlos A. Camargo · Sigmund J. Kharasch · Sigmund J. Kharasch
Barriers to addiction treatment among formerly incarcerated adults with substance use disorders Mandy D. Owens · Jessica A. Chen · Tracy L. Simpson · Tracy L. Simpson · Christine Timko · Christine Timko · Emily C. Williams · Emily C. Williams
Emergency department screening and interventions for substance use disorders Kathryn Hawk · Gail D’Onofrio · Gail D’Onofrio
Insights from individuals successfully recovered from cannabis use disorder: natural versus treatment-assisted recoveries and abstinent versus moderation outcomes David C. Hodgins · Jonathan N. Stea · Jonathan N. Stea
Prevalence and personal attitudes towards tobacco smoking among Palestinian healthcare professionals: a cross-sectional study Isra Y. Mizher · Shahd I. Fawaqa · Waleed M. Sweileh · Waleed M. Sweileh
How do people with mood and anxiety disorders perceive and interpret the Drinking Motives Questionnaire? A think-aloud study in a clinical setting Christina Nehlin · Christina Nehlin · Margareta Wennberg · Caisa Öster · Caisa Öster · Caisa Öster
Effect of exercise versus cognitive behavioural therapy or no intervention on anxiety, depression, fitness and quality of life in adults with previous methamphetamine dependency : a systematic review Linzette Morris · Jessica Stander · Wardah Ebrahim · Stephanie Eksteen · Orissa Anna Meaden · Ané Ras · Annemarie Wessels · Annemarie Wessels
Racial/ethnic differences in the association between alcohol use and mortality among men living with HIV Kara M. Bensley · Kathleen A. McGinnis · David A. Fiellin · Adam J. Gordon · Kevin L. Kraemer · Kendall Bryant · E. Jennifer Edelman · Stephen Crystal · Julie R. Gaither · P. Todd Korthuis · Brandon D. L. Marshall · India J. Ornelas · K. C. Gary Chan · Julia C. Dombrowski · John Fortney · Amy C. Justice · Emily C. Williams · Emily C. Williams
Developing adaptive interventions for adolescent substance use treatment settings: protocol of an observational, mixed-methods project Sean Grant · Denis Agniel · Daniel Almirall · Q. Burkhart · Sarah B. Hunter · Daniel F. McCaffrey · Eric R. Pedersen · Rajeev Ramchand · Beth Ann Griffin · Beth Ann Griffin
Testing the implementation and sustainment facilitation (ISF) strategy as an effective adjunct to the Addiction Technology Transfer Center (ATTC) strategy: study protocol for a cluster randomized trial Bryan R. Garner · Mark Zehner · Mathew Roosa · Steve Martino · Heather J. Gotham · Elizabeth L. Ball · Patricia Stilen · Kathryn Speck · Denna Vandersloot · Traci Rieckmann · Michael Chaple · Erika G. Martin · Erika G. Martin · David Kaiser · James H. Ford · James H. Ford
Proceedings of the 14th annual conference of INEBRIA: New York, NY, USA, September 14–15, 2017 0 · 0
A multi-center individual-randomized controlled trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention to prevent risky drinking in young people aged 14–15 in a high school setting Emma L. Giles · Dorothy Newbury-Birch · Simon Coulton · Paolo Deluca · Colin Drummond · D. Howel · Eileen Kaner · Elaine McColl · Ruth McGovern · S. Scott · E. Stamp · H. Sumnall · L. Vale · V. Alabani · A. Atkinson · S. Boniface · J. Ferguson · J. Frankham · E. Gilvarry · N. Hendrie · N. Howe · G. J. McGeechan · A. Ramsey · A. Ramsey
Alcohol consumption patterns and HIV viral suppression among persons receiving HIV care in Florida: an observational study Robert L. Cook · Zhi Zhou · N. E. Kelso-Chichetto · J. Janelle · Jamie P. Morano · Charurut Somboonwit · W. Carter · Gladys E. Ibañez · Nicole Ennis · Christa Cook · Ronald A. Cohen · Babette A. Brumback · Kendall Bryant · Kendall Bryant
Convenience without disclosure: a formative research study of a proposed integrated methadone and antiretroviral therapy service delivery model in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Alexis Cooke · Haneefa T. Saleem · Dorothy Mushi · Jessie Mbwambo · Saria Hassan · Barrot H. Lambdin · Barrot H. Lambdin
Reducing risky drinking in children and young people: alcohol perceptions and attitudes interview and survey findings Emma L. Giles · J. Clephane · S. Coulton · J. Ferguson · D. Gardiner · J. Holmes · N. Martin · G. J. McGeechan · C. Shevills · M. Soutar · Dorothy Newbury-Birch · Dorothy Newbury-Birch
The variability of outcomes used in efficacy and effectiveness trials of alcohol brief interventions: a systematic review Gillian W. Shorter · Nick Heather · Emma L. Giles · Aisha Holloway · Jeremy W. Bray · Anne H. Berman · Amy O’Donnell · Dorothy Newbury-Birch · Dorothy Newbury-Birch
Patterns of HIV testing, drug use, and sexual behaviors in people who use drugs: findings from a community-based outreach program in Phnom Penh, Cambodia Gitau Mburu · Chanrith Ngin · Sovannary Tuot · Pheak Chhoun · Khuondyla Pal · Siyan Yi · Siyan Yi
Factors influencing the long-term sustainment of quality improvements made in addiction treatment facilities: a qualitative study Scott P. Stumbo · James H. Ford · Carla A. Green · Carla A. Green
Screening in Trauma for Opioid Misuse Prevention (STOMP): study protocol for the development of an opioid risk screening tool for victims of injury Randall Brown · Brienna Deyo · Chelsea Riley · Andrew Quanbeck · Joseph E. Glass · Rebecca Turpin · Scott Hetzel · Christopher R. Nicholas · Maireni Cruz · Suresh Agarwal · Suresh Agarwal
Barriers and facilitators of the HIV care continuum in Southern New England for people with drug or alcohol use and living with HIV/AIDS: perspectives of HIV surveillance experts and service providers Lauretta E. Grau · Abbie Griffiths-Kundishora · Robert Heimer · Marguerite Hutcheson · Amy Nunn · Caitlin Towey · Thomas J. Stopka · Thomas J. Stopka
Changes in Specific Substance Involvement Scores among SBIRT recipients in an HIV primary care setting Carol Dawson-Rose · Jessica E. Draughon · Jessica E. Draughon · Yvette Cuca · Roland Zepf · Emily Huang · Bruce A. Cooper · Paula J. Lum · Paula J. Lum
Delivery of screening and brief intervention for unhealthy alcohol use in an urban academic Federally Qualified Health Center Marcus A. Bachhuber · Megan O’Grady · Henry Chung · Charles J. Neighbors · Joseph Deluca · Elenita M. D’Aloia · Arelis Diaz · Chinazo O. Cunningham · Chinazo O. Cunningham
Testing the effectiveness of a motivational interviewing-based brief intervention for substance use as an adjunct to usual care in community-based AIDS service organizations: study protocol for a multisite randomized controlled trial Bryan R. Garner · Heather J. Gotham · Stephen Tueller · Elizabeth L. Ball · David Kaiser · Patricia Stilen · Kathryn Speck · Denna Vandersloot · Traci Rieckmann · Michael Chaple · Erika G. Martin · Erika G. Martin · Steve Martino · Steve Martino
Role of substance use in HIV care cascade outcomes among people who inject drugs in Russia Bulat Idrisov · Karsten Lunze · Karsten Lunze · Debbie M. Cheng · Elena Blokhina · Natalia Gnatienko · Emily Quinn · Carly Bridden · Alexander Y. Walley · Kendall Bryant · Dmitry Lioznov · Evgeny Krupitsky · Jeffrey H. Samet · Jeffrey H. Samet
More beds are not the answer: transforming detoxification units into medication induction centers to address the opioid epidemic Peter D. Friedmann · Joji Suzuki · Joji Suzuki
VA residential substance use disorder treatment program providers perceptions of facilitators and barriers to performance on pre-admission processes Laura S. Ellerbe · Luisa Manfredi · Shalini Gupta · Tyler E. Phelps · Thomas Bowe · Anna D. Rubinsky · Jennifer L. Burden · Alex H. S. Harris · Alex H. S. Harris
Patient-centered primary care for adults at high risk for AUDs: the Choosing Healthier Drinking Options In primary CarE (CHOICE) trial Katharine A. Bradley · Katharine A. Bradley · Evette Ludman · Laura J. Chavez · Jennifer F. Bobb · Susan J. Ruedebusch · Carol E. Achtmeyer · Joseph O. Merrill · Andrew J. Saxon · Ryan M. Caldeiro · Diane Greenberg · Amy K. Lee · Julie E. Richards · Julie E. Richards · Rachel M. Thomas · Theresa E. Matson · Theresa E. Matson · Emily C. Williams · Eric J. Hawkins · Gwen T. Lapham · Daniel R. Kivlahan · Daniel R. Kivlahan
Barriers and facilitators to implementing addiction medicine fellowships: a qualitative study with fellows, medical students, residents and preceptors Jan Klimas · Will Small · Keith Ahamad · Walter Cullen · A. Mead · Launette Rieb · Evan Wood · Ryan McNeil · Ryan McNeil
Acceptability of a mobile health intervention to enhance HIV care coordination for patients with substance use disorders Ryan P. Westergaard · Andrew Genz · Kristen Panico · Pamela J. Surkan · Jeanne C. Keruly · Heidi E. Hutton · Larry W. Chang · Gregory D. Kirk · Gregory D. Kirk
Seek, test, treat: substance-using women in the HIV treatment cascade in South Africa Wendee M. Wechsberg · Charles van der Horst · Jacqueline Ndirangu · Irene A. Doherty · Tracy Kline · Felicia A. Browne · Jennifer M. Belus · Robin Nance · William A. Zule · William A. Zule
Associations of criminal justice and substance use treatment involvement with HIV/HCV testing and the HIV treatment cascade among people who use drugs in Oakland, California Barrot H. Lambdin · Barrot H. Lambdin · Barrot H. Lambdin · Alex H. Kral · Megan Comfort · Megan Comfort · Andrea M. Lopez · Jennifer Lorvick · Jennifer Lorvick
Rethinking alcohol interventions in health care: a thematic meeting of the International Network on Brief Interventions for Alcohol & Other Drugs (INEBRIA) Joseph E. Glass · Sven Andréasson · Katharine A. Bradley · Sara Wallhed Finn · Emily C. Williams · Ann-Sofie Bakshi · Antoni Gual · Nick Heather · Marcela Tiburcio Sainz · Vivek Benegal · Richard Saitz · Richard Saitz
Mobile technology intervention to improve care coordination between HIV and substance use treatment providers: development, training, and evaluation protocol Kasey Claborn · Kasey Claborn · Sara J. Becker · Susan E. Ramsey · Susan E. Ramsey · Josiah D. Rich · Josiah D. Rich · Peter D. Friedmann · Peter D. Friedmann
Enhancing patient navigation to improve intervention session attendance and viral load suppression of persons with HIV and substance use: a secondary post hoc analysis of the Project HOPE study Maxine L. Stitzer · Tim Matheson · Colin Cunningham · James L. Sorensen · Daniel J. Feaster · Lauren Gooden · Alexis S. Hammond · Heather Fitzsimons · Lisa R. Metsch · Lisa R. Metsch
Comparison of DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria for alcohol use disorders in VA primary care patients with frequent heavy drinking enrolled in a trial Traci A. Takahashi · Gwen T. Lapham · Laura J. Chavez · Laura J. Chavez · Amy K. Lee · Emily C. Williams · Julie E. Richards · Julie E. Richards · Diane Greenberg · Anna D. Rubinsky · Douglas Berger · Eric J. Hawkins · Joseph O. Merrill · Katharine A. Bradley · Katharine A. Bradley
Screening, treatment initiation, and referral for substance use disorders Steven L. Bernstein · Steven L. Bernstein · Gail D’Onofrio · Gail D’Onofrio
Integrated HIV care is associated with improved engagement in treatment in an urban methadone clinic Claire Simeone · Brad Shapiro · Paula J. Lum · Paula J. Lum
HIV treatment cascade among female entertainment and sex workers in Cambodia: impact of amphetamine use and an HIV prevention program Sokunny Muth · Aynar Len · Jennifer L. Evans · Maly Phou · Sophal Chhit · Yuthea Neak · Song Ngak · Ellen Stein · Adam W. Carrico · Lisa Maher · Kimberly Page · Kimberly Page
Validation of the AUDIT-C in adults seeking help with their drinking online Zarnie Khadjesari · Ian R. White · Jim McCambridge · Louise Marston · Paul Wallace · Christine Godfrey · Elizabeth Murray · Elizabeth Murray
Technology-assisted intervention for parents of adolescents in residential substance use treatment: protocol of an open trial and pilot randomized trial Sara J. Becker · Lynn Hernandez · Anthony Spirito · Selby M. Conrad · Selby M. Conrad
Prevalence and factors associated with use of khat: a survey of patients entering HIV treatment programs in Ethiopia Alan R. Lifson · Sale Workneh · Tibebe Shenie · Desalegn Admassu Ayana · Zenebe Melaku · Lemlem Bezabih · Hiwot Tekle Waktola · Behailu Dagne · Rose Hilk · Ken C. Winters · Lucy Slater · Lucy Slater
Opioid overdose prevention and naloxone rescue kits: what we know and what we dont know Todd Kerensky · Alexander Y. Walley · Alexander Y. Walley
Prenatal treatment for opioid dependency: observations from a large inner-city clinic Kelley Saia · Sarah M. Bagley · Elisha M. Wachman · Payal Patel · Marisa Nádas · Susan B. Brogly · Susan B. Brogly
A systematic review of health economic models of opioid agonist therapies in maintenance treatment of non-prescription opioid dependence Mersha Chetty · James Kenworthy · Sue Langham · Andrew Walker · William C. N. Dunlop · William C. N. Dunlop
The association between age of onset of opioid use and comorbidity among opioid dependent patients receiving methadone maintenance therapy Leen Naji · Brittany B. Dennis · Brittany B. Dennis · Monica Bawor · Michael Varenbut · Jeff Daiter · Carolyn Plater · Guillaume Paré · David C. Marsh · Andrew Worster · Dipika Desai · James MacKillop · Lehana Thabane · Lehana Thabane · Zainab Samaan · Zainab Samaan
Public sector low threshold office-based buprenorphine treatment: outcomes at year 7 Elenore Patterson Bhatraju · Ellie Grossman · Babak Tofighi · Jennifer McNeely · Danae DiRocco · Mara Flannery · Ann R. Garment · Keith Goldfeld · Marc N. Gourevitch · Joshua D. Lee · Joshua D. Lee
Examining multi-session brief intervention for substance use in primary care: research methods of a randomized controlled trial Jaclyn E. Chambers · Adam C. Brooks · Rachel Medvin · David S. Metzger · Jennifer Lauby · Carolyn M. Carpenedo · Kevin Favor · Kimberly C. Kirby · Kimberly C. Kirby
Study design to evaluate cognitive behavioral therapy among a diverse sample of adults with a first-time DUI offense Karen Chan Osilla · Katherine E. Watkins · Magdalena Kulesza · Karen Rocío Flórez · Marielena Lara-Greenberg · Jeremy N. V. Miles · Jeremy N. V. Miles
Acknowledgement of manuscript reviewers 2015 Jeffrey H. Samet · Jeffrey H. Samet
Sleep abnormalities associated with alcohol, cannabis, cocaine, and opiate use: a comprehensive review Gustavo A. Angarita · Nazli Emadi · Sarah E. Hodges · Peter T. Morgan · Peter T. Morgan
Linking Infectious and Narcology Care (LINC) in Russia: design, intervention and implementation protocol Natalia Gnatienko · Steve Choongheon Han · Evgeny Krupitsky · Elena Blokhina · Carly Bridden · Christine E. Chaisson · Debbie M. Cheng · Alexander Y. Walley · Anita Raj · Jeffrey H. Samet · Jeffrey H. Samet
Management of patients with issues related to opioid safety, efficacy and/or misuse: a case series from an integrated, interdisciplinary clinic William C. Becker · Jessica S. Merlin · Ajay Manhapra · Ellen L. Edens · Ellen L. Edens
Finding harmony so the music plays on: pragmatic trial design considerations to promote organizational sustainment of an empirically-supported behavior therapy Bryan Hartzler · K. Michelle Peavy · T. Ron Jackson · Molly Carney · Molly Carney
A computer-assisted motivational social network intervention to reduce alcohol, drug and HIV risk behaviors among Housing First residents David P. Kennedy · Sarah B. Hunter · Karen Chan Osilla · Ervant J. Maksabedian · Daniela Golinelli · Joan S. Tucker · Joan S. Tucker
Study protocol for a web-based personalized normative feedback alcohol intervention for young adult veterans Eric R. Pedersen · Grant N. Marshall · Terry L. Schell · Terry L. Schell
Hazardous drinking among young adults seeking outpatient mental health services Anna Ordóñez · Anna Ordóñez · Rachel Ranney · Maxine Schwartz · Carol A. Mathews · Carol A. Mathews · Derek D. Satre · Derek D. Satre · Derek D. Satre
Feasibility of a Computer-Assisted Social Network Motivational Interviewing Intervention for Substance Use and HIV Risk Behaviors for Housing First Residents Karen Chan Osilla · David P. Kennedy · Sarah B. Hunter · Ervant J. Maksabedian · Ervant J. Maksabedian
Multifaceted academic detailing program to increase pharmacotherapy for alcohol use disorder: interrupted time series evaluation of effectiveness Alex H. S. Harris · Thomas Bowe · Hildi Hagedorn · Andrea Nevedal · Andrea K. Finlay · Risha Gidwani · Craig S. Rosen · Chad L. Kay · Melissa Christopher · Melissa Christopher
Proceedings of the 13th annual conference of INEBRIA 0 · 0
Drinking to toxicity: college students referred for emergency medical evaluation Sigmund J. Kharasch · David R. McBride · Richard Saitz · Ward P. Myers · Ward P. Myers
Emerging adults in substance misuse intervention: preintervention characteristics and responses to a motivation-enhancing program Blair Beadnell · Michele A. Crisafulli · Pamela A. Stafford · Erin A. Casey · Erin A. Casey
Alcohol use in opioid agonist treatment Seonaid Nolan · Seonaid Nolan · Jan Klimas · Jan Klimas · Evan Wood · Evan Wood · Evan Wood
Implementation of integrated stepped care for unhealthy alcohol use in HIV clinics E. Jennifer Edelman · Nathan B. Hansen · Nathan B. Hansen · Christopher J. Cutter · Cheryl Danton · Lynn E. Fiellin · Patrick G. O’Connor · Emily C. Williams · Stephen A. Maisto · Kendall Bryant · David A. Fiellin · David A. Fiellin

MySafeRx: a mobile technology platform integrating motivational coaching, adherence monitoring, and electronic pill dispensing for enhancing buprenorphine/naloxone adherence during opioid use disorder treatment: a pilot study
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice | 2018
Zev Schuman-Olivier · Zev Schuman-Olivier · Zev Schuman-Olivier · Jacob T. Borodovsky · Jackson Steinkamp · Jackson Steinkamp · Qays Munir · Qays Munir · Kyle Butler · Mary Ann Greene · Jonah Goldblatt · Jonah Goldblatt · Hai Yi Xie · Lisa A. Marsch · Lisa A. Marsch
Eligibility for heroin-assisted treatment (HAT) among people who inject opioids and are living with HIV in a Canadian setting
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice | 2018
Jan Klimas · Jan Klimas · Jan Klimas · Huiru Dong · Nadia Fairbairn · Nadia Fairbairn · Eugenia Socías · Eugenia Socías · Rolando Barrios · Evan Wood · Evan Wood · Thomas Kerr · Thomas Kerr · Julio S. G. Montaner · Julio S. G. Montaner · M.-J. Milloy · M.-J. Milloy · M.-J. Milloy
Adherence intervention for HIV-infected persons who use drugs: adaptation, open trial, and pilot randomized hybrid type 1 trial protocol
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice | 2018
Kasey Claborn · Kasey Claborn · Sara J. Becker · Don Operario · Steve Safren · Josiah D. Rich · Josiah D. Rich · Susan E. Ramsey · Susan E. Ramsey
Development and differentiability of three brief interventions for risky alcohol use that include varying doses of motivational interviewing
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice | 2018
Jennifer E. Hettema · Stephanie Cockrell · Abigail Reeves · Karen S. Ingersoll · Paula J. Lum · Richard Saitz · Cristina Murray-Krezan · Valerie A. Carrejo · Valerie A. Carrejo
Evaluation of the effect of methamphetamine on traumatic injury complications and outcomes
Addiction Science & Clinical Practice | 2018
Michael M. Neeki · Michael M. Neeki · Fanglong Dong · Lidia Liang · Jake Toy · Braeden Carrico · Nina Jabourian · Arnold Sin · Arnold Sin · Farabi Hussain · Farabi Hussain · Sharon Brown · Keyvan Safdari · Keyvan Safdari · Rodney Borger · Rodney Borger · David Wong · David Wong · David Wong